Review of initiatives adopted for effective documentation of torture in a developing country

Clifford Perera
{"title":"Review of initiatives adopted for effective documentation of torture in a developing country","authors":"Clifford Perera","doi":"10.1016/j.jcfm.2006.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Effective documentation of torture is the key to successful interrogation and redress of torture victims. However the facilities available for such documentation to the forensic practitioners in less resourced countries are far from satisfactory. The emphasis on accurate and detailed documentation of examination findings of torture victims is currently necessary in Sri Lanka as the courts are relying heavily on medical reports for interrogation. In a situation where most of the torture victims are examined by unskilled medical officers who are not full time forensic practitioners, deficiencies of various degrees are commonly observed pertaining to depth of examination and documentation of examination findings. Therefore it was attempted in 2004, to introduce uniformity to existing documentation procedures by implementing Istanbul Protocol on island wide basis. However it was revealed that the adoption of the Istanbul Protocol could not be done as a whole in a short period due to variable degree of compliance from medical officers and further it need to be modified according to domestic requirements. The documentation of torture is a distinct multistage and multidisciplinary process. Therefore unless and untill a cohesive collaboration is established between all disciplines concerned, a positive development on documentation process cannot be anticipated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical forensic medicine","volume":"13 6","pages":"Pages 288-292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jcfm.2006.06.001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical forensic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353113106001428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Effective documentation of torture is the key to successful interrogation and redress of torture victims. However the facilities available for such documentation to the forensic practitioners in less resourced countries are far from satisfactory. The emphasis on accurate and detailed documentation of examination findings of torture victims is currently necessary in Sri Lanka as the courts are relying heavily on medical reports for interrogation. In a situation where most of the torture victims are examined by unskilled medical officers who are not full time forensic practitioners, deficiencies of various degrees are commonly observed pertaining to depth of examination and documentation of examination findings. Therefore it was attempted in 2004, to introduce uniformity to existing documentation procedures by implementing Istanbul Protocol on island wide basis. However it was revealed that the adoption of the Istanbul Protocol could not be done as a whole in a short period due to variable degree of compliance from medical officers and further it need to be modified according to domestic requirements. The documentation of torture is a distinct multistage and multidisciplinary process. Therefore unless and untill a cohesive collaboration is established between all disciplines concerned, a positive development on documentation process cannot be anticipated.

审查为有效记录发展中国家的酷刑而采取的主动行动
有效的酷刑记录是成功审讯和对酷刑受害者进行补救的关键。然而,在资源较少的国家,法医从业人员提供这种文件的设施远不能令人满意。斯里兰卡目前有必要强调准确和详细地记录酷刑受害者的检查结果,因为法院在审讯时严重依赖医疗报告。在大多数酷刑受害者由非专职法医的非熟练医务人员进行检查的情况下,通常发现在检查的深度和检查结果的记录方面存在不同程度的缺陷。因此,2004年试图在全岛范围内执行《伊斯坦布尔议定书》,以统一现有的文件程序。然而,据透露,由于医务人员遵守的程度不一,《伊斯坦布尔议定书》不可能在短期内整体通过,还需要根据国内要求对其进行修改。酷刑记录是一个独特的多阶段和多学科过程。因此,除非在所有有关学科之间建立起紧密的合作,否则无法预期文件编制过程的积极发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信