Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound staging of gastric cancer in routine clinical practice in Singapore.

Tiing Leong Ang, Tay Meng Ng, Kwong Ming Fock, Eng Kiong Teo
{"title":"Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound staging of gastric cancer in routine clinical practice in Singapore.","authors":"Tiing Leong Ang,&nbsp;Tay Meng Ng,&nbsp;Kwong Ming Fock,&nbsp;Eng Kiong Teo","doi":"10.1111/j.1443-9573.2006.00270.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Endoscopic ultrasound has emerged as the leading modality to assess the T and N stage in gastric cancer. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of TN staging by endoscopic ultrasound in routine clinical practice in Singapore.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a period of 7 years, 77 patients (male: 70%; median age 62.8 years) with gastric cancer underwent preoperative staging with endoscopic ultrasound. Fifty-seven patients eventually underwent surgery with tissues available for histopathological staging and comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The tumor locations were: cardia: 13; corpus: 20; incisura: 19; antrum: 25. The majority was poorly differentiated (57.1%); 26% were moderately differentiated and 16.9% were well differentiated adenocarcinoma. Compared to pathological staging, the overall accuracy of T staging by endoscopic ultrasound was 77.2% (17.5% under-staged: 5.3% over-staged). The staging accuracy of T1 (92.9%) and T3 (81.8%) was higher than T2 (57.1%) and T4. For N staging, the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound was 59.6% (26.3% under-staged; 14% over-staged); this was significantly superior to computer tomography (43.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endoscopic ultrasound is useful for the T staging of gastric cancer, with an overall accuracy rate of 77%, and up to 93% for T1 lesions. Under-staging may occur due to microscopic tumor infiltration, while over-staging may arise due to inflammatory reactions. The accuracy of N staging is lower at 60%, but could be further improved with the use of fine needle aspiration.</p>","PeriodicalId":10082,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of digestive diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1443-9573.2006.00270.x","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of digestive diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1443-9573.2006.00270.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Objective: Endoscopic ultrasound has emerged as the leading modality to assess the T and N stage in gastric cancer. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of TN staging by endoscopic ultrasound in routine clinical practice in Singapore.

Methods: Over a period of 7 years, 77 patients (male: 70%; median age 62.8 years) with gastric cancer underwent preoperative staging with endoscopic ultrasound. Fifty-seven patients eventually underwent surgery with tissues available for histopathological staging and comparison.

Results: The tumor locations were: cardia: 13; corpus: 20; incisura: 19; antrum: 25. The majority was poorly differentiated (57.1%); 26% were moderately differentiated and 16.9% were well differentiated adenocarcinoma. Compared to pathological staging, the overall accuracy of T staging by endoscopic ultrasound was 77.2% (17.5% under-staged: 5.3% over-staged). The staging accuracy of T1 (92.9%) and T3 (81.8%) was higher than T2 (57.1%) and T4. For N staging, the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound was 59.6% (26.3% under-staged; 14% over-staged); this was significantly superior to computer tomography (43.9%).

Conclusion: Endoscopic ultrasound is useful for the T staging of gastric cancer, with an overall accuracy rate of 77%, and up to 93% for T1 lesions. Under-staging may occur due to microscopic tumor infiltration, while over-staging may arise due to inflammatory reactions. The accuracy of N staging is lower at 60%, but could be further improved with the use of fine needle aspiration.

新加坡常规临床实践中胃镜超声分期的准确性。
目的:内镜超声已成为评估胃癌T期和N期的主要方式。本研究旨在评估内镜超声在新加坡常规临床实践中TN分期的准确性。方法:在7年的时间里,77例患者(男性70%;中位年龄62.8岁)胃癌患者术前行内镜超声分期。57名患者最终接受了手术,其组织可用于组织病理学分期和比较。结果:肿瘤部位为:贲门13例;语料库:20;切迹:19;腔:25。多数为低分化(57.1%);中分化腺癌占26%,高分化腺癌占16.9%。与病理分期相比,超声内镜下T分期的总体准确率为77.2%(分期不足17.5%,分期过高5.3%)。T1(92.9%)和T3(81.8%)的分期准确率高于T2(57.1%)和T4。对于N分期,内镜超声的准确率为59.6%(分期下26.3%;14% over-staged);这明显优于计算机断层扫描(43.9%)。结论:内镜下超声对胃癌T期诊断有较好的应用价值,总体准确率为77%,对T1期病变的准确率可达93%。显微镜下肿瘤浸润可能导致分期不足,而炎症反应可能导致分期过高。N分期的准确性较低,为60%,但可以通过细针穿刺进一步提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信