Lumbar ontogenetic allometry and dimorphism in humans. A case for comparison between interspecific and intraspecific scaling.

E Valverde, A Casinos, C Alba-Fernández, L Del Río
{"title":"Lumbar ontogenetic allometry and dimorphism in humans. A case for comparison between interspecific and intraspecific scaling.","authors":"E Valverde,&nbsp;A Casinos,&nbsp;C Alba-Fernández,&nbsp;L Del Río","doi":"10.1080/09243860600601699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ontogenetic allometry of the lumbar region of 1913 humans (1228 females and 685 males), ranging from newborn to 21-year-old individuals, was studied by means of length, width, projected surface area and bone mineral density of the segment L2 - L4, obtained by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). All these parameters were regressed to body mass and height of the individuals, considered alternatively as the independent variable. Firstly, we addressed the comparison between the results obtained on both sexes in order to elucidate whether ontogenetic differences existed. Length of the segments increased significantly faster in females than in males, independently whether the regression was made against body mass or height, while in both types of regression width scaled in males faster than in females. Regarding bone mineral density, although males increased bone mineral density faster than females, slope differences were not significant. However, y-interception was significantly higher in females than in males when bone mineral density was regressed to body mass. Results on length and width are compared with others from previous research on allometry. Finally, global results are discussed as regards the slope predictions for interspecific scaling.</p>","PeriodicalId":77122,"journal":{"name":"European journal of morphology","volume":"42 4-5","pages":"185-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09243860600601699","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of morphology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09243860600601699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The ontogenetic allometry of the lumbar region of 1913 humans (1228 females and 685 males), ranging from newborn to 21-year-old individuals, was studied by means of length, width, projected surface area and bone mineral density of the segment L2 - L4, obtained by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). All these parameters were regressed to body mass and height of the individuals, considered alternatively as the independent variable. Firstly, we addressed the comparison between the results obtained on both sexes in order to elucidate whether ontogenetic differences existed. Length of the segments increased significantly faster in females than in males, independently whether the regression was made against body mass or height, while in both types of regression width scaled in males faster than in females. Regarding bone mineral density, although males increased bone mineral density faster than females, slope differences were not significant. However, y-interception was significantly higher in females than in males when bone mineral density was regressed to body mass. Results on length and width are compared with others from previous research on allometry. Finally, global results are discussed as regards the slope predictions for interspecific scaling.

人类腰椎个体发育异速和二态性。种间和种内缩放的比较案例。
本文采用双x线吸收仪(DXA)测量L2 - L4节段的长度、宽度、投影表面积和骨密度,研究了1913例新生儿至21岁人群(女性1228人,男性685人)腰椎区域的个体异速发育。所有这些参数都回归到个体的体重和身高,作为自变量考虑。首先,我们解决了两性结果之间的比较,以阐明是否存在个体发生差异。无论是否根据体重或身高进行回归,女性的片段长度增长明显快于男性,而在两种类型的回归中,男性的宽度缩放速度都快于女性。骨密度方面,虽然男性骨密度的增加速度快于女性,但斜率差异不显著。然而,当骨密度回归到体重时,女性的y截获量明显高于男性。对长度和宽度的研究结果进行了比较。最后,讨论了种间尺度坡度预测的全球结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信