Gene-environment interactions in complex diseases: genetic models and methods for QTL mapping in multiple half-sib populations.

Genetical research Pub Date : 2006-10-01 Epub Date: 2006-09-15 DOI:10.1017/S0016672306008391
Haja N Kadarmideen, Yongjun Li, Luc L G Janss
{"title":"Gene-environment interactions in complex diseases: genetic models and methods for QTL mapping in multiple half-sib populations.","authors":"Haja N Kadarmideen,&nbsp;Yongjun Li,&nbsp;Luc L G Janss","doi":"10.1017/S0016672306008391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An interval quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping method for complex polygenic diseases (as binary traits) showing QTL by environment interactions (QEI) was developed for outbred populations on a within-family basis. The main objectives, within the above context, were to investigate selection of genetic models and to compare liability or generalized interval mapping (GIM) and linear regression interval mapping (RIM) methods. Two different genetic models were used: one with main QTL and QEI effects (QEI model) and the other with only a main QTL effect (QTL model). Over 30 types of binary disease data as well as six types of continuous data were simulated and analysed by RIM and GIM. Using table values for significance testing, results show that RIM had an increased false detection rate (FDR) for testing interactions which was attributable to scale effects on the binary scale. GIM did not suffer from a high FDR for testing interactions. The use of empirical thresholds, which effectively means higher thresholds for RIM for testing interactions, could repair this increased FDR for RIM, but such empirical thresholds would have to be derived for each case because the amount of FDR depends on the incidence on the binary scale. RIM still suffered from higher biases (15-100% over- or under-estimation of true values) and high standard errors in QTL variance and location estimates than GIM for QEI models. Hence GIM is recommended for disease QTL mapping with QEI. In the presence of QEI, the model including QEI has more power (20-80% increase) to detect the QTL when the average QTL effect is small (in a situation where the model with a main QTL only is not too powerful). Top-down model selection is proposed in which a full test for QEI is conducted first and then the model is subsequently simplified. Methods and results will be applicable to human, plant and animal QTL mapping experiments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12777,"journal":{"name":"Genetical research","volume":"88 2","pages":"119-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0016672306008391","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672306008391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2006/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

An interval quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping method for complex polygenic diseases (as binary traits) showing QTL by environment interactions (QEI) was developed for outbred populations on a within-family basis. The main objectives, within the above context, were to investigate selection of genetic models and to compare liability or generalized interval mapping (GIM) and linear regression interval mapping (RIM) methods. Two different genetic models were used: one with main QTL and QEI effects (QEI model) and the other with only a main QTL effect (QTL model). Over 30 types of binary disease data as well as six types of continuous data were simulated and analysed by RIM and GIM. Using table values for significance testing, results show that RIM had an increased false detection rate (FDR) for testing interactions which was attributable to scale effects on the binary scale. GIM did not suffer from a high FDR for testing interactions. The use of empirical thresholds, which effectively means higher thresholds for RIM for testing interactions, could repair this increased FDR for RIM, but such empirical thresholds would have to be derived for each case because the amount of FDR depends on the incidence on the binary scale. RIM still suffered from higher biases (15-100% over- or under-estimation of true values) and high standard errors in QTL variance and location estimates than GIM for QEI models. Hence GIM is recommended for disease QTL mapping with QEI. In the presence of QEI, the model including QEI has more power (20-80% increase) to detect the QTL when the average QTL effect is small (in a situation where the model with a main QTL only is not too powerful). Top-down model selection is proposed in which a full test for QEI is conducted first and then the model is subsequently simplified. Methods and results will be applicable to human, plant and animal QTL mapping experiments.

复杂疾病中的基因-环境相互作用:多个半同胞群体QTL定位的遗传模型和方法。
建立了一种显示环境相互作用(QEI)的复杂多基因疾病(二元性状)区间数量性状位点(QTL)定位方法。在上述背景下,主要目的是研究遗传模型的选择,并比较责任或广义区间映射(GIM)和线性回归区间映射(RIM)方法。采用两种不同的遗传模型,一种是主QTL和QEI效应(QEI模型),另一种是仅主QTL效应(QTL模型)。采用RIM和GIM对30余种二元疾病数据和6种连续数据进行了模拟分析。使用表值进行显著性检验,结果表明RIM在测试相互作用时具有更高的误检率(FDR),这可归因于二元量表上的规模效应。在测试相互作用时,GIM不受高FDR的影响。使用经验阈值,这实际上意味着测试相互作用时RIM的阈值更高,可以修复RIM增加的FDR,但这种经验阈值必须为每种情况导出,因为FDR的数量取决于二元尺度上的发生率。在QEI模型中,RIM仍然存在较高的偏差(15-100%高估或低估真实值),QTL方差和位置估计的标准误差也比GIM高。因此,建议使用GIM与QEI进行疾病QTL定位。在QEI存在的情况下,当平均QTL效应较小时(仅含主QTL的模型不太强大的情况下),包含QEI的模型检测QTL的能力更强(提高20-80%)。提出了自顶向下的模型选择方法,首先对QEI进行全面测试,然后对模型进行简化。方法和结果将适用于人类、植物和动物QTL定位实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信