{"title":"Quantitative study on magnetic-based stress detection and risk evaluation for girth welds with unequal wall thickness of high-grade steel pipelines","authors":"Tengjiao He, Kexi Liao, Guoxi He, Jianhua Zhao, Shasha Deng, Jihui Leng","doi":"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>The magnetic-based stress detection technology has a great application potential in the field of </span>girth weld stress detection. However, this technology lacks an effective theoretical model as a scientific guide. Therefore, to investigate the quantitative relationship between the magnetic gradient signal and weld stress and quantitatively evaluate the stress status of girth welds. In this paper, a numerical simulation model of stress-induced magnetic signals of girth welds with unequal wall thickness (UWT) is first established. Then, the model is used to calculate and analyse the quantitative variation law of the magnetic gradient signal of the girth weld with stress and detection height. Moreover, a magnetic-based stress detection and risk evaluation method is established to assess the stress failure risk of girth welds with UWT, whose accuracy is experimentally validated. The results indicate that the </span>residual strength ratio </span><em>RSR</em> exponentially reduces from 0.83 to 0.49 as the <em>G</em><sub>max</sub><span> increases from 373 to 542 μT/m. Moreover, the goodness of fit of the experimental data based on this relationship mentioned above reaches 0.98. The magnetic signal also exhibits a decaying exponential trend with detection height (0.1 m–0.3 m) when the internal pressure varies within 3 MPa–9 MPa. The numerical range of the </span><em>RSR</em> of seven girth welds is 0.31–0.95, which shows good agreement with the contact inspection results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 104825"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510022004115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
The magnetic-based stress detection technology has a great application potential in the field of girth weld stress detection. However, this technology lacks an effective theoretical model as a scientific guide. Therefore, to investigate the quantitative relationship between the magnetic gradient signal and weld stress and quantitatively evaluate the stress status of girth welds. In this paper, a numerical simulation model of stress-induced magnetic signals of girth welds with unequal wall thickness (UWT) is first established. Then, the model is used to calculate and analyse the quantitative variation law of the magnetic gradient signal of the girth weld with stress and detection height. Moreover, a magnetic-based stress detection and risk evaluation method is established to assess the stress failure risk of girth welds with UWT, whose accuracy is experimentally validated. The results indicate that the residual strength ratio RSR exponentially reduces from 0.83 to 0.49 as the Gmax increases from 373 to 542 μT/m. Moreover, the goodness of fit of the experimental data based on this relationship mentioned above reaches 0.98. The magnetic signal also exhibits a decaying exponential trend with detection height (0.1 m–0.3 m) when the internal pressure varies within 3 MPa–9 MPa. The numerical range of the RSR of seven girth welds is 0.31–0.95, which shows good agreement with the contact inspection results.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering and the science of natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of natural gas science and engineering from the reservoir to the market.
An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering covers the fields of natural gas exploration, production, processing and transmission in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of natural gas; natural gas geochemistry; gas-reservoir engineering; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced gas recovery; thermodynamics and phase behaviour, gas-reservoir modelling and simulation; natural gas production engineering; primary and enhanced production from unconventional gas resources, subsurface issues related to coalbed methane, tight gas, shale gas, and hydrate production, formation evaluation; exploration methods, multiphase flow and flow assurance issues, novel processing (e.g., subsea) techniques, raw gas transmission methods, gas processing/LNG technologies, sales gas transmission and storage. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering will also focus on economical, environmental, management and safety issues related to natural gas production, processing and transportation.