Pathways, networks and choice in health care.

Justin Keen, Jeanette Moore, Robert West
{"title":"Pathways, networks and choice in health care.","authors":"Justin Keen,&nbsp;Jeanette Moore,&nbsp;Robert West","doi":"10.1108/09526860610671373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the paper is to present an alternative to the supply chain model of health care delivery that currently informs most thinking about the design of care processes.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>The paper draws on arguments from systems theories and public administration, to generate an analysis of the nature of health care processes. It sets out a model of services characterised by treatment and care needs that vary over time, that are inherently uncertain, involve frequent assessment and re-assessment, and provide patients and service providers with choices about treatment and care. Evidence from an evaluation of intermediate care is used to illustrate the analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The analysis suggests that both the supply chain and a more network-like model of health care processes can help us to understand health care processes. The two are complementary.</p><p><strong>Research limitations/implications: </strong>Largely conceptual in nature. The empirical evidence is taken from one study. The ideas are presented to stimulate thinking rather than to prove an argument.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>The conceptualisation of care processes as network-like has implications for the way in which we think about the design and performance of health care systems.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>There have been few publications that seek to use both systems and network approaches to understand health care processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":80009,"journal":{"name":"International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services","volume":"19 4-5","pages":"316-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/09526860610671373","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/09526860610671373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the paper is to present an alternative to the supply chain model of health care delivery that currently informs most thinking about the design of care processes.

Design/methodology/approach: The paper draws on arguments from systems theories and public administration, to generate an analysis of the nature of health care processes. It sets out a model of services characterised by treatment and care needs that vary over time, that are inherently uncertain, involve frequent assessment and re-assessment, and provide patients and service providers with choices about treatment and care. Evidence from an evaluation of intermediate care is used to illustrate the analysis.

Findings: The analysis suggests that both the supply chain and a more network-like model of health care processes can help us to understand health care processes. The two are complementary.

Research limitations/implications: Largely conceptual in nature. The empirical evidence is taken from one study. The ideas are presented to stimulate thinking rather than to prove an argument.

Practical implications: The conceptualisation of care processes as network-like has implications for the way in which we think about the design and performance of health care systems.

Originality/value: There have been few publications that seek to use both systems and network approaches to understand health care processes.

卫生保健的途径、网络和选择。
目的:本文的目的是提出一种替代医疗保健服务的供应链模型,目前通知大多数关于护理过程设计的思考。设计/方法/方法:本文借鉴了系统理论和公共行政的论点,对卫生保健过程的本质进行了分析。它提出了一种服务模式,其特点是治疗和护理需求随时间而变化,本质上是不确定的,涉及频繁的评估和再评估,并为患者和服务提供者提供治疗和护理的选择。来自中间护理评估的证据被用来说明分析。研究结果:分析表明,供应链和更像网络的医疗保健流程模型都可以帮助我们理解医疗保健流程。这两者是互补的。研究局限/启示:本质上主要是概念性的。经验证据取自一项研究。提出这些观点是为了激发思考,而不是为了证明一个论点。实际影响:将护理过程概念化为网络样,对我们思考卫生保健系统的设计和性能的方式有影响。原创性/价值:很少有出版物试图同时使用系统和网络方法来理解卫生保健过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信