What is the role of airway pressure release ventilation in the management of acute lung injury?

Douglas E Petsinger, Jan D Fernandez, John D Davies
{"title":"What is the role of airway pressure release ventilation in the management of acute lung injury?","authors":"Douglas E Petsinger,&nbsp;Jan D Fernandez,&nbsp;John D Davies","doi":"10.1016/j.rcc.2006.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The lack of published evidence supporting the use of APRV in the pediatric critical care patient population may diminish its effective application in respiratory failure. The effect of APRV on the number of ventilator days, ICU stay, and mortality still remains to be studied. Further application of APRV in the role of rest settings for ECMO especially in the pediatric cardiac patient population needs to be investigated. Will the use of APRV decrease the time for adequate lung recruitment, decrease sheer trauma, and/or promote earlier decannulation upon the restoration of tolerable cardiac function? Can APRV be utilized as a re-recruitment maneuver? A comparison of APRV over sustained in a randomized-controlled fashion, will there be a significant difference in ventilator days, length of ICU stay, and/or mortality? Does re-recruitment at plateau pressures during suctioning, patient position changes, or in the face of increased airway resistance decrease the number of ventilator days, length of ICU stay, and/or mortality? Does the use of continuous monitoring of carbon dioxide production aid in optimizing P(high)? The list of questions, both speculative and scientific are too numerous to list. Speculation leads to inquiry which over time drives science. More focus is needed on randomized, controlled trials. Initially the comparison of APRV to HFOV needs to be the primary focus for a proactive approach for ALI. Once a comfort level is established with this modality, further scientific inquires will follow. In the meantime, its use is likely to remain controversial.</p>","PeriodicalId":79530,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care clinics of North America","volume":"12 3","pages":"483-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care clinics of North America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcc.2006.06.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The lack of published evidence supporting the use of APRV in the pediatric critical care patient population may diminish its effective application in respiratory failure. The effect of APRV on the number of ventilator days, ICU stay, and mortality still remains to be studied. Further application of APRV in the role of rest settings for ECMO especially in the pediatric cardiac patient population needs to be investigated. Will the use of APRV decrease the time for adequate lung recruitment, decrease sheer trauma, and/or promote earlier decannulation upon the restoration of tolerable cardiac function? Can APRV be utilized as a re-recruitment maneuver? A comparison of APRV over sustained in a randomized-controlled fashion, will there be a significant difference in ventilator days, length of ICU stay, and/or mortality? Does re-recruitment at plateau pressures during suctioning, patient position changes, or in the face of increased airway resistance decrease the number of ventilator days, length of ICU stay, and/or mortality? Does the use of continuous monitoring of carbon dioxide production aid in optimizing P(high)? The list of questions, both speculative and scientific are too numerous to list. Speculation leads to inquiry which over time drives science. More focus is needed on randomized, controlled trials. Initially the comparison of APRV to HFOV needs to be the primary focus for a proactive approach for ALI. Once a comfort level is established with this modality, further scientific inquires will follow. In the meantime, its use is likely to remain controversial.

气道压力释放通气在急性肺损伤治疗中的作用?
缺乏公开的证据支持在儿科重症患者人群中使用APRV可能会降低其在呼吸衰竭中的有效应用。APRV对呼吸机天数、ICU住院时间和死亡率的影响仍有待研究。APRV在ECMO休息环境中的应用,特别是在儿科心脏病患者群体中的应用,还需要进一步研究。APRV的使用是否会减少肺再生的时间,减少纯粹的创伤,和/或在可耐受的心功能恢复后促进早期脱管?APRV可以用作再招聘策略吗?以随机对照的方式比较APRV,在呼吸机天数、ICU住院时间和/或死亡率方面是否存在显著差异?在吸痰平台压力下,患者体位改变,或面对气道阻力增加,是否会降低呼吸机天数、ICU住院时间和/或死亡率?持续监测二氧化碳产量是否有助于优化P(高)?这个问题的清单,既有推测性的,也有科学性的,太多了,无法一一列出。猜测导致探究,探究随着时间的推移推动科学的发展。需要更多地关注随机对照试验。首先,APRV与HFOV的比较需要成为ALI前瞻性方法的主要焦点。一旦这种模式的舒适度被确立,进一步的科学研究就会随之而来。与此同时,它的使用可能仍然存在争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信