Impact of cyclooxygenase inhibitors in the Women's Health Initiative hormone trials: secondary analysis of a randomized trial.

Judith Hsia, Joann E Manson, Lewis Kuller, Mary Pettinger, John H Choe, Robert D Langer, Marian Limacher, Albert Oberman, Judith Ockene, Mary Jo O'Sullivan, Jennifer G Robinson
{"title":"Impact of cyclooxygenase inhibitors in the Women's Health Initiative hormone trials: secondary analysis of a randomized trial.","authors":"Judith Hsia,&nbsp;Joann E Manson,&nbsp;Lewis Kuller,&nbsp;Mary Pettinger,&nbsp;John H Choe,&nbsp;Robert D Langer,&nbsp;Marian Limacher,&nbsp;Albert Oberman,&nbsp;Judith Ockene,&nbsp;Mary Jo O'Sullivan,&nbsp;Jennifer G Robinson","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0010026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We evaluated the hypothesis that cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor use might have counteracted a beneficial effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy, and account for the absence of cardioprotection in the Women's Health Initiative hormone trials. Estrogen increases COX expression, and inhibitors of COX such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents appear to increase coronary risk, raising the possibility of a clinically important interaction in the trials.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The hormone trials were randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled. Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was assessed at baseline and at years 1, 3, and 6.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The Women's Health Initiative hormone trials were conducted at 40 clinical sites in the United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The trials enrolled 27,347 postmenopausal women, aged 50-79 y.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>We randomized 16,608 women with intact uterus to conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg with medroxyprogesterone acetate 2.5 mg daily or to placebo, and 10,739 women with prior hysterectomy to conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg daily or placebo.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Myocardial infarction, coronary death, and coronary revascularization were ascertained during 5.6 y of follow-up in the estrogen plus progestin trial and 6.8 y of follow-up in the estrogen alone trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated from Cox proportional hazard models stratified by COX inhibitor use. The hazard ratio for myocardial infarction/coronary death with estrogen plus progestin was 1.13 (95% confidence interval 0.68-1.89) among non-users of COX inhibitors, and 1.35 (95% confidence interval 0.86-2.10) among continuous users. The hazard ratio with estrogen alone was 0.92 (95% confidence interval 0.57-1.48) among non-users of COX inhibitors, and 1.08 (95% confidence interval 0.69-1.70) among continuous users. In a second analytic approach, hazard ratios were calculated from Cox models that included hormone trial assignment as well as a time-dependent covariate for medication use, and an interaction term. No significant interaction was identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of COX inhibitors did not significantly affect the Women's Health Initiative hormone trial results.</p>","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010026","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated the hypothesis that cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor use might have counteracted a beneficial effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy, and account for the absence of cardioprotection in the Women's Health Initiative hormone trials. Estrogen increases COX expression, and inhibitors of COX such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents appear to increase coronary risk, raising the possibility of a clinically important interaction in the trials.

Design: The hormone trials were randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled. Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was assessed at baseline and at years 1, 3, and 6.

Setting: The Women's Health Initiative hormone trials were conducted at 40 clinical sites in the United States.

Participants: The trials enrolled 27,347 postmenopausal women, aged 50-79 y.

Interventions: We randomized 16,608 women with intact uterus to conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg with medroxyprogesterone acetate 2.5 mg daily or to placebo, and 10,739 women with prior hysterectomy to conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg daily or placebo.

Outcome measures: Myocardial infarction, coronary death, and coronary revascularization were ascertained during 5.6 y of follow-up in the estrogen plus progestin trial and 6.8 y of follow-up in the estrogen alone trial.

Results: Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated from Cox proportional hazard models stratified by COX inhibitor use. The hazard ratio for myocardial infarction/coronary death with estrogen plus progestin was 1.13 (95% confidence interval 0.68-1.89) among non-users of COX inhibitors, and 1.35 (95% confidence interval 0.86-2.10) among continuous users. The hazard ratio with estrogen alone was 0.92 (95% confidence interval 0.57-1.48) among non-users of COX inhibitors, and 1.08 (95% confidence interval 0.69-1.70) among continuous users. In a second analytic approach, hazard ratios were calculated from Cox models that included hormone trial assignment as well as a time-dependent covariate for medication use, and an interaction term. No significant interaction was identified.

Conclusions: Use of COX inhibitors did not significantly affect the Women's Health Initiative hormone trial results.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

环加氧酶抑制剂对妇女健康倡议激素试验的影响:随机试验的二次分析
目的:我们评估了环氧化酶(COX)抑制剂的使用可能抵消了绝经后激素治疗的有益作用的假设,并解释了妇女健康倡议激素试验中缺乏心脏保护的原因。雌激素增加COX表达,COX抑制剂如非甾体抗炎药似乎增加冠状动脉风险,增加了试验中临床重要相互作用的可能性。设计:激素试验采用随机、双盲和安慰剂对照。在基线和第1、3、6年评估非甾体抗炎药的使用情况。环境:妇女健康倡议激素试验在美国的40个临床地点进行。受试者:试验纳入了27,347名绝经后妇女,年龄在50-79岁之间。干预措施:我们将16,608名子宫完整的妇女随机分配到每天0.625毫克结合雌激素和醋酸甲孕酮2.5毫克或安慰剂组,10,739名子宫切除过的妇女随机分配到每天0.625毫克结合雌激素或安慰剂组。结果指标:雌激素加黄体酮组随访5.6 y,单独雌激素组随访6.8 y,确定心肌梗死、冠状动脉死亡和冠状动脉血运重建术。结果:使用Cox抑制剂分层的Cox比例风险模型计算出95%置信区间的风险比。在未使用COX抑制剂的患者中,雌激素加黄体酮导致心肌梗死/冠状动脉死亡的风险比为1.13(95%可信区间为0.68-1.89),在连续使用COX抑制剂的患者中,风险比为1.35(95%可信区间为0.86-2.10)。在未使用COX抑制剂的人群中,单独使用雌激素的风险比为0.92(95%可信区间0.57-1.48),在连续使用COX抑制剂的人群中,风险比为1.08(95%可信区间0.69-1.70)。在第二种分析方法中,从Cox模型计算风险比,该模型包括激素试验分配、药物使用的时间依赖协变量和相互作用项。没有发现明显的相互作用。结论:使用COX抑制剂对妇女健康倡议激素试验结果没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信