Activity-Based Therapies

Alexander W. Dromerick , Peter S. Lum , Joseph Hidler
{"title":"Activity-Based Therapies","authors":"Alexander W. Dromerick ,&nbsp;Peter S. Lum ,&nbsp;Joseph Hidler","doi":"10.1016/j.nurx.2006.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Therapeutic activity is a mainstay of clinical neurorehabilitation, but is typically unstructured and directed at compensation rather than restoration of central nervous system function. Newer activity-based therapies (ABTs) are in early stages of development and testing. The ABTs attempt to restore function via standardized therapeutic activity based on principles of experimental psychology, exercise physiology, and neuroscience. Three of the best developed ABTs are constraint-induced therapy, robotic therapy directed at the hemiplegic arm, and treadmill training techniques aimed at improving gait in persons with stroke and spinal cord injury. These treatments appear effective in improving arm function and gait, but they have not yet been clearly demonstrated to be more effective than equal amounts of traditional techniques. Resistance training is clearly demonstrated to improve strength in persons with stroke and brain injury, and most studies show that it does not increase hypertonia. Clinical trials of ABTs face several methodological challenges. These challenges include defining dosage, standardizing treatment parameters across subjects and within treatment sessions, and determining what constitutes clinically significant treatment effects. The long-term goal is to develop prescriptive ABT, where specific activities are proven to treat specific motor system disorders. Activity-based therapies are not a cure, but are likely to play an important role in future treatment cocktails for stroke and spinal cord injury.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87195,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRx : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 428-438"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.nurx.2006.07.004","citationCount":"68","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRx : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S154553430600126X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 68

Abstract

Therapeutic activity is a mainstay of clinical neurorehabilitation, but is typically unstructured and directed at compensation rather than restoration of central nervous system function. Newer activity-based therapies (ABTs) are in early stages of development and testing. The ABTs attempt to restore function via standardized therapeutic activity based on principles of experimental psychology, exercise physiology, and neuroscience. Three of the best developed ABTs are constraint-induced therapy, robotic therapy directed at the hemiplegic arm, and treadmill training techniques aimed at improving gait in persons with stroke and spinal cord injury. These treatments appear effective in improving arm function and gait, but they have not yet been clearly demonstrated to be more effective than equal amounts of traditional techniques. Resistance training is clearly demonstrated to improve strength in persons with stroke and brain injury, and most studies show that it does not increase hypertonia. Clinical trials of ABTs face several methodological challenges. These challenges include defining dosage, standardizing treatment parameters across subjects and within treatment sessions, and determining what constitutes clinically significant treatment effects. The long-term goal is to develop prescriptive ABT, where specific activities are proven to treat specific motor system disorders. Activity-based therapies are not a cure, but are likely to play an important role in future treatment cocktails for stroke and spinal cord injury.

作业疗法
治疗活动是临床神经康复的支柱,但通常是非结构化的,并针对代偿而不是中枢神经系统功能的恢复。较新的基于活动的疗法(ABTs)正处于开发和测试的早期阶段。ABTs试图通过基于实验心理学、运动生理学和神经科学原理的标准化治疗活动来恢复功能。发展最好的三种ABTs是约束诱导疗法,针对偏瘫手臂的机器人疗法,以及旨在改善中风和脊髓损伤患者步态的跑步机训练技术。这些治疗在改善手臂功能和步态方面似乎是有效的,但它们还没有被清楚地证明比同等数量的传统技术更有效。抗阻训练被清楚地证明可以提高中风和脑损伤患者的力量,大多数研究表明它不会增加高张力。ABTs的临床试验面临着一些方法学上的挑战。这些挑战包括确定剂量,标准化跨受试者和治疗期间的治疗参数,以及确定什么构成临床显著的治疗效果。长期目标是开发处方ABT,其中特定的活动被证明可以治疗特定的运动系统疾病。以活动为基础的疗法不能治愈,但可能在未来中风和脊髓损伤的治疗鸡尾酒中发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信