Understanding the information needs of general practitioners managing a rare genetic disorder (osteogenesis imperfecta).

Philip Zack, Catherine Devile, Christine Clark, Robert Surtees
{"title":"Understanding the information needs of general practitioners managing a rare genetic disorder (osteogenesis imperfecta).","authors":"Philip Zack,&nbsp;Catherine Devile,&nbsp;Christine Clark,&nbsp;Robert Surtees","doi":"10.1159/000094475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lack of adequate knowledge is a common problem in medicine, but is a particular problem in a rapidly advancing field like genetics. This study uses the example of a rare genetic disorder (osteogenesis imperfecta) to understand the information needs of primary care physicians (GPs).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether a knowledge gap is recognised, how GPs currently attempt to overcome it, and what features of an information resource are preferred by GPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>GPs of children affected by osteogenesis imperfecta in and around Greater London were interviewed, using both questionnaire-based semi-structured interview and a qualitatively analysed open-ended discussion. Consultations in both primary and tertiary care settings over a 5-year period were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Problems due to osteogenesis imperfecta were presented to GPs in about one third of consultations with these patients. GPs reported finding such patients difficult to manage due to lack of knowledge. Knowledge from tertiary sources, which was authoritative, accessible and relevant, was preferred, particularly when reasoning was explained. Primary literature and clinical guidelines were not favoured.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Empirical evidence supports and elaborates theoretical models for provision of clinically useful information. A model for improved information services using authoritative web-based information linked to electronic patient records is suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":80975,"journal":{"name":"Community genetics","volume":"9 4","pages":"260-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000094475","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000094475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Background: Lack of adequate knowledge is a common problem in medicine, but is a particular problem in a rapidly advancing field like genetics. This study uses the example of a rare genetic disorder (osteogenesis imperfecta) to understand the information needs of primary care physicians (GPs).

Objectives: To determine whether a knowledge gap is recognised, how GPs currently attempt to overcome it, and what features of an information resource are preferred by GPs.

Methods: GPs of children affected by osteogenesis imperfecta in and around Greater London were interviewed, using both questionnaire-based semi-structured interview and a qualitatively analysed open-ended discussion. Consultations in both primary and tertiary care settings over a 5-year period were compared.

Results: Problems due to osteogenesis imperfecta were presented to GPs in about one third of consultations with these patients. GPs reported finding such patients difficult to manage due to lack of knowledge. Knowledge from tertiary sources, which was authoritative, accessible and relevant, was preferred, particularly when reasoning was explained. Primary literature and clinical guidelines were not favoured.

Conclusions: Empirical evidence supports and elaborates theoretical models for provision of clinically useful information. A model for improved information services using authoritative web-based information linked to electronic patient records is suggested.

了解全科医生处理罕见遗传疾病(成骨不全症)的信息需求。
背景:缺乏足够的知识在医学上是一个普遍的问题,但在像遗传学这样快速发展的领域是一个特殊的问题。本研究使用罕见的遗传疾病(成骨不全症)的例子来了解初级保健医生(全科医生)的信息需求。目的:确定是否认识到知识差距,全科医生目前如何尝试克服它,以及全科医生更喜欢信息资源的哪些特征。方法:对大伦敦及其周边地区成骨不全患儿的全科医生进行访谈,采用基于问卷的半结构化访谈和定性分析开放式讨论。比较了5年期间初级和三级保健机构的咨询情况。结果:由于成骨不全的问题提出了全科医生在约三分之一的咨询与这些患者。全科医生报告说,由于缺乏知识,这类患者很难管理。来自第三来源的知识是权威的、可获得的和相关的,特别是在解释推理时。主要文献和临床指南不受欢迎。结论:经验证据支持并阐述了提供临床有用信息的理论模型。建议使用与电子病历相关联的基于网络的权威信息改进信息服务模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信