[Orthopaedic surgery residency: comparison between the German and the North American system].

H Steckel, V Musahl, F H Fu, M H Baums, W Schultz, H M Klinger
{"title":"[Orthopaedic surgery residency: comparison between the German and the North American system].","authors":"H Steckel,&nbsp;V Musahl,&nbsp;F H Fu,&nbsp;M H Baums,&nbsp;W Schultz,&nbsp;H M Klinger","doi":"10.1055/s-2006-942125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>On the way to the unification of the European Union (EU), Germany has passed a new medical professional education system at the 106 (th) German medical board in Cologne in 2003. The medical board has established a new residency programme for the specialty of orthopaedic surgery, which was previously separated into orthopaedic and trauma surgery. An exchange of orthopaedic surgeons within the EU is therefore less complicated. For an exchange outside the EU, an international comparison especially with the USA is warranted.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We analysed and compared the German \"Assistenzarzt System\" with the residency programme of the USA regarding the specialty of orthopaedic surgery and further sub-specialisation programmes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After evaluation of both systems, a high conformity in the basic training for orthopaedic surgery was demonstrated. However, there is a difference between the two systems regarding specialisation after residency training with the German \"Oberarzt\" on the one side and the American fellow system on the other side.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that the German orthopaedic training matches well with the American residency programs. There is potential for acknowledgement of the German title \"Orthopaedic surgeon\" in the USA. In some states, such as Pennsylvania, European medical specialists are given institutionally restricted work permission for limited periods of time. It remains, however, questionable if there is a general political intent for the USA to acknowledge German or European residency programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":76855,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete","volume":"144 4","pages":"357-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2006-942125","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-942125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: On the way to the unification of the European Union (EU), Germany has passed a new medical professional education system at the 106 (th) German medical board in Cologne in 2003. The medical board has established a new residency programme for the specialty of orthopaedic surgery, which was previously separated into orthopaedic and trauma surgery. An exchange of orthopaedic surgeons within the EU is therefore less complicated. For an exchange outside the EU, an international comparison especially with the USA is warranted.

Method: We analysed and compared the German "Assistenzarzt System" with the residency programme of the USA regarding the specialty of orthopaedic surgery and further sub-specialisation programmes.

Results: After evaluation of both systems, a high conformity in the basic training for orthopaedic surgery was demonstrated. However, there is a difference between the two systems regarding specialisation after residency training with the German "Oberarzt" on the one side and the American fellow system on the other side.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the German orthopaedic training matches well with the American residency programs. There is potential for acknowledgement of the German title "Orthopaedic surgeon" in the USA. In some states, such as Pennsylvania, European medical specialists are given institutionally restricted work permission for limited periods of time. It remains, however, questionable if there is a general political intent for the USA to acknowledge German or European residency programs.

骨科住院医师:德国与北美制度的比较。
目的:在欧盟统一的道路上,德国于2003年在科隆举行的第106届德国医学委员会上通过了一项新的医学专业教育制度。医疗委员会为整形外科专业制定了新的住院医师方案,该专业以前分为整形外科和创伤外科。因此,在欧盟内部交换整形外科医生就不那么复杂了。对于欧盟以外的交易所,需要进行国际比较,特别是与美国进行比较。方法:我们分析和比较了德国的“助理医生制度”与美国的住院医师计划关于骨科专科和进一步的亚专科计划。结果:通过对两套系统的评价,表明两套系统在骨科基础训练中具有较高的符合性。然而,在住院医师培训后的专业化方面,两种系统之间存在差异,一方面是德国的“Oberarzt”,另一方面是美国的同伴系统。结论:本研究表明,德国骨科培训与美国住院医师培训相匹配。在美国,有可能承认德国的“骨科医生”头衔。在一些州,如宾夕法尼亚州,欧洲医学专家在有限的时间内获得制度限制的工作许可。然而,美国是否有一个普遍的政治意图来承认德国或欧洲的居留计划仍然值得怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信