Neuropsychological Dysfunction in HIV Infection:A Review.

N Dunbar, B Brew
{"title":"Neuropsychological Dysfunction in HIV Infection:A Review.","authors":"N Dunbar,&nbsp;B Brew","doi":"10.1300/j128v01n03_05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>FIfty-six studies which used neuropsychological tests to investigate areas of function affected by central nervous system dysfunction in HIV were reviewed. Only studies which compared the performance of HIV + subjects to HIV - controls using analysis of variance techniques were included. The results are examined in terms of broad neuropsychological function domains, and are examined separately for asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects. Studies which did and did not find significant differences between HIV + and HIV - subjects were compared in terms of various confounding factors such as risk groups, number of tests, sample size and subject characteristics. There was evidence for some dysfunction among subjects who are otherwise asymptomatic in the areas of verbal memory (27% of studies), executive function (43%), motor performance (20%) and information processing (44%). Studies of subjects with more advanced HIV infection showed consistent evidence of abnormal functioning in the areas of verbal (48% of studies) and visual memory (43%), executive functioning (71%), complex attention (62%), motor performance (37%) and information processing (69%). These deficits occurred prior to the onset of clinically apparent dementia. There were no consistent significant differences between studies which did and did not find significant differences between HIV + and HIV - subjects in terms of most of the confounding variables investigated, although studies of ASX subjects were more likely to find differences between HIV + subjects and controls with larger neuropsychological test battereies. However, much of the variation in results due to the neuropsychological tests used. In many cases, tests which relied on functions with a frontal lobe component were more likely to find significant results.</p>","PeriodicalId":73854,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neuro-AIDS","volume":" ","pages":"73-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neuro-AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/j128v01n03_05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

FIfty-six studies which used neuropsychological tests to investigate areas of function affected by central nervous system dysfunction in HIV were reviewed. Only studies which compared the performance of HIV + subjects to HIV - controls using analysis of variance techniques were included. The results are examined in terms of broad neuropsychological function domains, and are examined separately for asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects. Studies which did and did not find significant differences between HIV + and HIV - subjects were compared in terms of various confounding factors such as risk groups, number of tests, sample size and subject characteristics. There was evidence for some dysfunction among subjects who are otherwise asymptomatic in the areas of verbal memory (27% of studies), executive function (43%), motor performance (20%) and information processing (44%). Studies of subjects with more advanced HIV infection showed consistent evidence of abnormal functioning in the areas of verbal (48% of studies) and visual memory (43%), executive functioning (71%), complex attention (62%), motor performance (37%) and information processing (69%). These deficits occurred prior to the onset of clinically apparent dementia. There were no consistent significant differences between studies which did and did not find significant differences between HIV + and HIV - subjects in terms of most of the confounding variables investigated, although studies of ASX subjects were more likely to find differences between HIV + subjects and controls with larger neuropsychological test battereies. However, much of the variation in results due to the neuropsychological tests used. In many cases, tests which relied on functions with a frontal lobe component were more likely to find significant results.

HIV感染中的神经心理障碍:综述。
本文综述了56项使用神经心理学测试来调查受HIV中枢神经系统功能障碍影响的功能区域的研究。仅包括使用方差分析技术比较HIV阳性受试者与HIV对照组表现的研究。结果在广泛的神经心理功能领域进行检查,并对无症状和有症状的受试者分别进行检查。研究人员根据各种混杂因素,如风险群体、测试次数、样本量和受试者特征,对有和没有发现艾滋病毒阳性和艾滋病毒阳性受试者之间存在显著差异的研究进行了比较。有证据表明,在语言记忆(27%的研究)、执行功能(43%)、运动表现(20%)和信息处理(44%)等方面,无症状的受试者存在一些功能障碍。对晚期HIV感染者的研究显示,在语言(48%的研究)和视觉记忆(43%)、执行功能(71%)、复杂注意力(62%)、运动表现(37%)和信息处理(69%)等领域的功能异常。这些缺陷发生在临床表现明显的痴呆发病之前。在大多数被调查的混杂变量方面,没有发现HIV +和HIV -受试者之间存在显著差异的研究之间没有一致的显著差异,尽管ASX受试者的研究更有可能发现HIV +受试者和具有更大神经心理学测试电池的对照组之间的差异。然而,结果的很大差异是由于所使用的神经心理学测试。在许多情况下,依赖于额叶部分功能的测试更有可能找到显著的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信