The effect of clinical judgment in decision-making: the Mental Health Act 1986 (Vic.) and the Mental Health Review Board.

Q3 Psychology

Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry Pub Date : 2006-01-01 DOI:10.1891/ehpp.8.1.43

Megan Pearson

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article seeks to critically examine whether the reliance upon clinical judgment in decision-making under the Mental Health Act 1986 (Vic.) (MHA) and the Mental Health Review Board (MHRB) assists or hinders Parliament's key objective in passing the current MHA in 1986: least restrictive treatment.

查看原文本刊更多论文

临床判断对决策的影响:《1986年精神卫生法》(维多利亚州)和精神健康审查委员会。

本文试图批判性地考察根据《1986年精神卫生法》(Vic.) (MHA)和精神卫生审查委员会(MHRB)在决策中对临床判断的依赖是否有助于或阻碍了议会在1986年通过现行《精神卫生法》的关键目标:最少限制治疗。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry Psychology-Clinical Psychology

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Visit Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry Online on IngentaConnect to view tables of contents or to subscribe. Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry (EHPP) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research reports, reviews, essays, book reviews, commentaries, and case reports examining all the ramifications of the idea that emotional distress is due to an underlying organic disease that is best treated with pharmacological therapy. This oversimplified view of human nature permeates virtually every area of our society including medicine, business, law, education, politics, and the media. Thus, we welcome submissions from a broad range of specialties. EHPP is the official publication of the International Center for the Study of Psychiatry and Psychology (ICSPP).