Intra-professional and inter-professional referral patterns of chiropractors.

Monica Smith, Barry R Greene, Mitchell Haas, Veerasathpurush Allareddy
{"title":"Intra-professional and inter-professional referral patterns of chiropractors.","authors":"Monica Smith,&nbsp;Barry R Greene,&nbsp;Mitchell Haas,&nbsp;Veerasathpurush Allareddy","doi":"10.1186/1746-1340-14-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the increasing popularity of chiropractic care in the United States, inter-professional relationships between conventional trained physicians (MDs and DOs) and chiropractors (DCs) will have an expanding impact on patient care. The objectives of this study are to describe the intra-professional referral patterns amongst DCs, describe the inter-professional referral patterns between DCs and conventional trained medical primary care physicians (MDPCPs), and to identify provider characteristics that may affect these referral behaviors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey instrument to assess the attitudes and patterns of referral and consultation between MD primary care physicians (MDPCPs) and DCs was developed and sent to all DCs in the state of Iowa. Multivariable logistic regression models were built to assess the impact of provider characteristics on intra-professional and inter-professional referral patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of all DCs contacted, 452 (40.7%) participated in the study. Close to 8% of DCs reported that they never send a case report when referring a patient to another DC, while 13% never send a case report to a MDPCP. About 10% of DCs never send follow-up clinical information to referring doctors. DCs that perform differential diagnosis were significantly more likely to have engaged in inter-professional referral than DCs who did not perform differential diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The tendency toward informality, in both referral practices and sharing of clinical documentation for referred patients between MDPCPs and DCs, is an explicit marker of concerns that need to be addressed in order to improve coordination and continuity of care for patients shared between these provider types.</p>","PeriodicalId":87173,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","volume":"14 ","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1746-1340-14-12","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-14-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Background: With the increasing popularity of chiropractic care in the United States, inter-professional relationships between conventional trained physicians (MDs and DOs) and chiropractors (DCs) will have an expanding impact on patient care. The objectives of this study are to describe the intra-professional referral patterns amongst DCs, describe the inter-professional referral patterns between DCs and conventional trained medical primary care physicians (MDPCPs), and to identify provider characteristics that may affect these referral behaviors.

Methods: A survey instrument to assess the attitudes and patterns of referral and consultation between MD primary care physicians (MDPCPs) and DCs was developed and sent to all DCs in the state of Iowa. Multivariable logistic regression models were built to assess the impact of provider characteristics on intra-professional and inter-professional referral patterns.

Results: Of all DCs contacted, 452 (40.7%) participated in the study. Close to 8% of DCs reported that they never send a case report when referring a patient to another DC, while 13% never send a case report to a MDPCP. About 10% of DCs never send follow-up clinical information to referring doctors. DCs that perform differential diagnosis were significantly more likely to have engaged in inter-professional referral than DCs who did not perform differential diagnosis.

Conclusion: The tendency toward informality, in both referral practices and sharing of clinical documentation for referred patients between MDPCPs and DCs, is an explicit marker of concerns that need to be addressed in order to improve coordination and continuity of care for patients shared between these provider types.

脊医专业内及专业间转诊模式。
背景:随着脊椎指压治疗在美国的日益普及,传统训练医师(md和DOs)和脊椎指压治疗师(DCs)之间的跨专业关系将对患者护理产生越来越大的影响。本研究的目的是描述dc之间的专业内转诊模式,描述dc与传统培训的初级保健医生(mdpcp)之间的专业间转诊模式,并确定可能影响这些转诊行为的提供者特征。方法:开发了一种调查工具,用于评估MD初级保健医生(mdpcp)和dc之间转诊和咨询的态度和模式,并将其发送到爱荷华州的所有dc。建立多变量logistic回归模型来评估提供者特征对专业内和专业间转诊模式的影响。结果:在所有联系的dc中,452(40.7%)参与了研究。近8%的DC报告称,他们在将患者转介给另一个DC时从未发送病例报告,而13%的DC从未向MDPCP发送病例报告。大约10%的诊所从不向转诊医生发送后续临床信息。与未进行鉴别诊断的dc相比,进行鉴别诊断的dc更有可能进行跨专业转诊。结论:在转诊实践和mdpcp和dc之间转诊患者临床文件的共享中,不成文的趋势是需要解决的问题的明确标志,以改善这些提供者类型之间共享的患者护理的协调和连续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信