Policy and science of FMD control: the stakeholders' contribution to decision making. A call for integrated animal disease management.

M Marshall, P Roger
{"title":"Policy and science of FMD control: the stakeholders' contribution to decision making. A call for integrated animal disease management.","authors":"M Marshall,&nbsp;P Roger","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective control of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD)--prevention, surveillance and response--requires integrated animal disease management as a cooperative effort between stakeholders, scientists and decision makers, at all levels: local, national, regional and international. This paper suggests a process and outlines specific critical issues that need to be addressed in order to best use the science and technology that is available now and to develop new technologies that will lead to significant improvements. The overall objective is not to allow the disease or the disease control measures to damage, violate or destroy public health, the environment, or the economy, or to allow politics to drive disease control policies at the expense of the ethical relationship between man and animals. Critical issues of prevention, surveillance and response policies are examined, and specific recommendations are made to reduce the risk or effect of natural and deliberate introductions. For prevention: a) rapid portable diagnostics and provision of vaccines to control and eradicate the reservoirs of disease. b) alerts, leading to increased controls at borders, animal movement restrictions and biosecurity on farms. For surveillance: a) reporting of unusual symptoms, rapid diagnostics and identification of patterns. b) enhanced role of geographic information systems (GIS) linked to an IT system. c) collection, storage and sharing of disease information. For response policies: a) the role and implementation of stamping out and of vaccination. b) simulation exercises with stakeholder participation. For all aspects of FMD control, consideration should be given to: a) the composition, responsibilities and role of the balanced, permanently operational Expert Group in EU member states as specified in the EU FMD Directive. b) establishment of a balanced, permanently operational European Expert Group. c) establishment of both a European and an International FMD Task Force. Stakeholders need access to accurate, up-to-date, unbiased information about the science of disease control, how the technologies work and can be used, and an assurance that the technologies best fit for the required purpose will be used. Researchers need to work together to avoid duplications and gaps in their research and to recognise the benefit of new, and sometimes innovative, technologies. They also need feedback from stakeholders on the acceptability and best use of the technologies. A process to achieve these goals through an EU funded collaborative research project will be described.</p>","PeriodicalId":75994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical & laboratory immunology","volume":"53 ","pages":"27-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical & laboratory immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective control of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD)--prevention, surveillance and response--requires integrated animal disease management as a cooperative effort between stakeholders, scientists and decision makers, at all levels: local, national, regional and international. This paper suggests a process and outlines specific critical issues that need to be addressed in order to best use the science and technology that is available now and to develop new technologies that will lead to significant improvements. The overall objective is not to allow the disease or the disease control measures to damage, violate or destroy public health, the environment, or the economy, or to allow politics to drive disease control policies at the expense of the ethical relationship between man and animals. Critical issues of prevention, surveillance and response policies are examined, and specific recommendations are made to reduce the risk or effect of natural and deliberate introductions. For prevention: a) rapid portable diagnostics and provision of vaccines to control and eradicate the reservoirs of disease. b) alerts, leading to increased controls at borders, animal movement restrictions and biosecurity on farms. For surveillance: a) reporting of unusual symptoms, rapid diagnostics and identification of patterns. b) enhanced role of geographic information systems (GIS) linked to an IT system. c) collection, storage and sharing of disease information. For response policies: a) the role and implementation of stamping out and of vaccination. b) simulation exercises with stakeholder participation. For all aspects of FMD control, consideration should be given to: a) the composition, responsibilities and role of the balanced, permanently operational Expert Group in EU member states as specified in the EU FMD Directive. b) establishment of a balanced, permanently operational European Expert Group. c) establishment of both a European and an International FMD Task Force. Stakeholders need access to accurate, up-to-date, unbiased information about the science of disease control, how the technologies work and can be used, and an assurance that the technologies best fit for the required purpose will be used. Researchers need to work together to avoid duplications and gaps in their research and to recognise the benefit of new, and sometimes innovative, technologies. They also need feedback from stakeholders on the acceptability and best use of the technologies. A process to achieve these goals through an EU funded collaborative research project will be described.

口蹄疫控制的政策和科学:利益相关者对决策的贡献。呼吁综合动物疾病管理。
有效控制口蹄疫(FMD)——预防、监测和应对——需要在地方、国家、区域和国际各级利益攸关方、科学家和决策者之间的合作下进行综合动物疾病管理。本文提出了一个过程,并概述了需要解决的具体关键问题,以便最好地利用现有的科学和技术,并开发将导致重大改进的新技术。总体目标是不允许疾病或疾病控制措施损害、违反或破坏公共卫生、环境或经济,也不允许政治以牺牲人与动物之间的伦理关系为代价来驱动疾病控制政策。审查了预防、监测和应对政策的关键问题,并提出了具体建议,以减少自然和故意引入的风险或影响。预防方面:a)快速便携式诊断和提供疫苗,以控制和根除疾病宿主。B)警报,导致加强边境控制,限制动物流动和农场生物安全。监测方面:a)报告异常症状、快速诊断和确定模式。b)加强与资讯科技系统相连的地理资讯系统的作用。C)收集、存储和共享疾病信息。应对政策:a)根除和疫苗接种的作用和实施。B)有利益相关者参与的模拟练习。对于口蹄疫控制的所有方面,应考虑到:a)欧盟口蹄疫指令中规定的欧盟成员国平衡的、永久运作的专家组的组成、责任和作用。b)建立一个平衡的、长期运作的欧洲专家组。c)建立欧洲和国际口蹄疫工作队。利益攸关方需要获得关于疾病控制科学的准确、最新和无偏见的信息,这些技术如何工作和如何使用,并确保将使用最适合所需目的的技术。科学家需要共同努力,以避免他们的研究中的重复和差距,并认识到新的、有时是创新的技术的好处。他们还需要涉众对技术的可接受性和最佳使用的反馈。将描述通过欧盟资助的合作研究项目实现这些目标的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信