A comparative evaluation of pharmacy services in single and no pharmacy towns.

V Bruce Sunderland, Suzanne D Burrows, Andrew W Joyce
{"title":"A comparative evaluation of pharmacy services in single and no pharmacy towns.","authors":"V Bruce Sunderland,&nbsp;Suzanne D Burrows,&nbsp;Andrew W Joyce","doi":"10.1186/1743-8462-3-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent attention has focused on access of communities to pharmacy services in rural areas. To increase access to pharmacy services in rural Western Australia some doctors have been granted a licence to dispense medication on the rationale that a pharmacy would not be economically viable in that community. However, there have been no studies conducted on whether a doctor dispensing service adequately provides a pharmacy service with respect to access and quality.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Residents of seven single pharmacy towns and seven non-pharmacy rural towns were surveyed to evaluate pharmacy services delivered by a pharmacist and doctor. The towns were chosen to match closely on key demographic features, with an average population of 1,246 and 1,263 respectively. A random sample of 150 households from each town was sent the questionnaire on pharmacy services (1050 in each group). Data was also collected from the Health Insurance Commission (HIC) on dispensing locations for the residents of the two groups of towns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in access to pharmacy services with 82.4% of participants from pharmacy towns accessing medications within their town compared to 51.3% of non-pharmacy town participants. The HIC data supported these trends with pharmacy town residents having relatively higher prescription rates within their town compared to non-pharmacy town residents where they were more likely to access prescriptions out of their town.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pharmacy town participants were more satisfied with access to health and pharmacy services within their town. Continuation of the doctor dispensing policy requires a greater consideration of the pharmacy needs of rural residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":87170,"journal":{"name":"Australia and New Zealand health policy","volume":"3 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1743-8462-3-8","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australia and New Zealand health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-3-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Background: Recent attention has focused on access of communities to pharmacy services in rural areas. To increase access to pharmacy services in rural Western Australia some doctors have been granted a licence to dispense medication on the rationale that a pharmacy would not be economically viable in that community. However, there have been no studies conducted on whether a doctor dispensing service adequately provides a pharmacy service with respect to access and quality.

Method: Residents of seven single pharmacy towns and seven non-pharmacy rural towns were surveyed to evaluate pharmacy services delivered by a pharmacist and doctor. The towns were chosen to match closely on key demographic features, with an average population of 1,246 and 1,263 respectively. A random sample of 150 households from each town was sent the questionnaire on pharmacy services (1050 in each group). Data was also collected from the Health Insurance Commission (HIC) on dispensing locations for the residents of the two groups of towns.

Results: There was a significant difference in access to pharmacy services with 82.4% of participants from pharmacy towns accessing medications within their town compared to 51.3% of non-pharmacy town participants. The HIC data supported these trends with pharmacy town residents having relatively higher prescription rates within their town compared to non-pharmacy town residents where they were more likely to access prescriptions out of their town.

Conclusion: Pharmacy town participants were more satisfied with access to health and pharmacy services within their town. Continuation of the doctor dispensing policy requires a greater consideration of the pharmacy needs of rural residents.

Abstract Image

单镇与无镇药房服务的比较评价。
背景:最近的注意力集中在社区获得农村地区的药房服务。为了增加西澳大利亚农村地区获得药房服务的机会,一些医生获得了分发药物的许可证,理由是在该社区开设药房在经济上是不可行的。然而,还没有对医生配药服务是否在可及性和质量方面充分提供药房服务进行过研究。方法:对7个单一药房镇和7个非药房乡镇的居民进行调查,对一名药剂师和一名医生提供的药学服务进行评价。这两个城镇的主要人口特征非常接近,平均人口分别为1246人和1263人。随机抽取各镇150户(每组1050户)进行药学服务问卷调查。还从健康保险委员会(HIC)收集了两组城镇居民的配药地点的数据。结果:在获得药房服务方面存在显著差异,来自药房城镇的参与者中有82.4%的人在本镇获得药物,而非药房城镇参与者中有51.3%的人在本镇获得药物。HIC数据支持这些趋势,与非药房城镇居民相比,药房城镇居民在城镇内的处方率相对较高,而非药房城镇居民更有可能在城镇外获得处方。结论:药学小镇参与者对所在城镇的卫生和药学服务更满意。医生配药政策的延续需要更多地考虑农村居民的药房需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信