{"title":"Initial data supporting the design of the Candesartan in Heart failure--assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme.","authors":"Robert S McKelvie","doi":"10.1097/01.hjh.0000220401.15751.3f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The therapies developed to treat heart failure over the years have resulted in a significant improvement in clinical outcome. The 1-year mortality following hospital discharge remains unacceptably high, however. Furthermore, a significant number of patients are unable to tolerate angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Clearly, scope remains for the improvement of neurohormonal blockade in patients with heart failure, and there is a particular need for alternative therapies in patients who are unable to tolerate ACE inhibitors. The use of angiotensin II receptor blockers may provide a means of fulfilling these needs.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This paper reviews the studies examining the angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan in comparison with placebo, in comparison with ACE inhibitors, and in combination with ACE inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall the review found candesartan was effective and safe in various clinical settings. These initial data were used to design the Candesartan in Heart failure--Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. The mechanistic studies performed prior to the CHARM programme supported the rationale to design a large trial examining the effects of candesartan on clinical events.</p>","PeriodicalId":16074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension","volume":"24 1","pages":"S9-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/01.hjh.0000220401.15751.3f","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000220401.15751.3f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background: The therapies developed to treat heart failure over the years have resulted in a significant improvement in clinical outcome. The 1-year mortality following hospital discharge remains unacceptably high, however. Furthermore, a significant number of patients are unable to tolerate angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Clearly, scope remains for the improvement of neurohormonal blockade in patients with heart failure, and there is a particular need for alternative therapies in patients who are unable to tolerate ACE inhibitors. The use of angiotensin II receptor blockers may provide a means of fulfilling these needs.
Objectives: This paper reviews the studies examining the angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan in comparison with placebo, in comparison with ACE inhibitors, and in combination with ACE inhibitors.
Conclusions: Overall the review found candesartan was effective and safe in various clinical settings. These initial data were used to design the Candesartan in Heart failure--Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. The mechanistic studies performed prior to the CHARM programme supported the rationale to design a large trial examining the effects of candesartan on clinical events.