Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human).

Jeanine Griffin, Benjamin R Emery, Ivan Huang, C Matthew Peterson, Douglas T Carrell
{"title":"Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human).","authors":"Jeanine Griffin,&nbsp;Benjamin R Emery,&nbsp;Ivan Huang,&nbsp;C Matthew Peterson,&nbsp;Douglas T Carrell","doi":"10.1186/1743-1050-3-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laboratory animals are commonly used for evaluating the physiological properties of the mammalian ovarian follicle and the enclosed oocyte. The use of different species to determine the morphological relationship between the follicle and oocyte has led to a recognizable pattern of follicular stages, but differences in follicle size, oocyte diameter and granulosa cell proliferation are not consistent across the different species. In an effort to better understand how these differences are expressed across multiple species, this investigation evaluates oocyte and follicle diameters and granulosa cell proliferation in the mouse, hamster, pig, and human.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Histological sections of ovaries from the mouse, hamster, pig, and human were used to calculate the diameter of the oocyte and follicle and the number of granulosa cells present at pre-determined stages of follicular development. A statistical analysis of these data was performed to determine the relationship of follicular growth and development within and between the species tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>These data have revealed that the relationships of the features listed are tightly regulated within each species, but they vary between the species studied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This information may be useful for comparative studies conducted in different animal models and the human.</p>","PeriodicalId":87102,"journal":{"name":"Journal of experimental & clinical assisted reproduction","volume":"3 ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1743-1050-3-2","citationCount":"194","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of experimental & clinical assisted reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-1050-3-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 194

Abstract

Background: Laboratory animals are commonly used for evaluating the physiological properties of the mammalian ovarian follicle and the enclosed oocyte. The use of different species to determine the morphological relationship between the follicle and oocyte has led to a recognizable pattern of follicular stages, but differences in follicle size, oocyte diameter and granulosa cell proliferation are not consistent across the different species. In an effort to better understand how these differences are expressed across multiple species, this investigation evaluates oocyte and follicle diameters and granulosa cell proliferation in the mouse, hamster, pig, and human.

Methods: Histological sections of ovaries from the mouse, hamster, pig, and human were used to calculate the diameter of the oocyte and follicle and the number of granulosa cells present at pre-determined stages of follicular development. A statistical analysis of these data was performed to determine the relationship of follicular growth and development within and between the species tested.

Results: These data have revealed that the relationships of the features listed are tightly regulated within each species, but they vary between the species studied.

Conclusion: This information may be useful for comparative studies conducted in different animal models and the human.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

四种哺乳动物(小鼠、仓鼠、猪和人)卵泡形态和卵母细胞直径的比较分析。
背景:实验动物常被用来评价哺乳动物卵泡和卵母细胞的生理特性。利用不同的物种来确定卵泡和卵母细胞之间的形态关系,导致了一个可识别的卵泡阶段模式,但卵泡大小、卵母细胞直径和颗粒细胞增殖的差异在不同物种之间并不一致。为了更好地了解这些差异是如何在不同物种中表达的,本研究评估了小鼠、仓鼠、猪和人的卵母细胞和卵泡直径以及颗粒细胞增殖。方法:采用小鼠、仓鼠、猪和人卵巢的组织学切片,计算卵母细胞和卵泡的直径以及在卵泡发育的预定阶段存在的颗粒细胞的数量。对这些数据进行了统计分析,以确定所测试物种内部和物种之间卵泡生长和发育的关系。结果:这些数据揭示了所列出的特征之间的关系在每个物种内部都受到严格的调节,但它们在不同的物种之间有所不同。结论:该信息可用于不同动物模型和人类的比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信