PCR and dissection as tools to monitor filarial infection of Aedes polynesiensis mosquitoes in French Polynesia.

Catherine Plichart, Yves Sechan, Neil Davies, Anne-Marie Legrand
{"title":"PCR and dissection as tools to monitor filarial infection of Aedes polynesiensis mosquitoes in French Polynesia.","authors":"Catherine Plichart,&nbsp;Yves Sechan,&nbsp;Neil Davies,&nbsp;Anne-Marie Legrand","doi":"10.1186/1475-2883-5-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Entomological methods may provide important tools for monitoring the transmission of filariasis in French Polynesia. In order to standardize our PCR method and refine our protocol to assess filarial infection levels in mosquitoes, we compared dissection of the vector, Aedes polynesiensis, with the poolscreening polymerase chain reaction (PS-PCR) assay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>(1) Mosquitoes were collected in human landing catches in five areas in Moorea island, French Polynesia. (2) A fraction of the captured mosquitoes was dissected for Wuchereria bancrofti larvae. (3) Laboratory-reared mosquitoes (uninfected as well as experimentally infected ones) were repeatedly tested to optimize a PS-PCR protocol (DNA extracts from 1-50 pooled mosquitoes were tested with an internal standardized system and primers specific for the Ssp1 repeat sequence. PCR products were analysed by gel electrophoresis). (4) Another fraction of the captured mosquitoes was assayed by PS-PCR according the optimized protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of field-mosquito infection with W. bancrofti ranged from 1 to 8 % by dissection (L1-L3) and point estimates of infection prevalence, as assayed by PS-PCR, ranged from 0.4 to 3.7 %. There was a moderately strong correlation between larval infection rates as determined by dissection and PCR.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our results suggest that the PS-PCR assay is specific and highly sensitive for detecting parasite DNA. We obtained similar although not identical results with dissections of mosquitoes. PS-PCR appears to be adequate for testing large numbers of mosquitoes in the context of filariasis elimination programs. The role and advantages of using entomologic methods to monitor filariasis programs are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":84756,"journal":{"name":"Filaria journal","volume":"5 ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1475-2883-5-2","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filaria journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2883-5-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

Abstract

Background: Entomological methods may provide important tools for monitoring the transmission of filariasis in French Polynesia. In order to standardize our PCR method and refine our protocol to assess filarial infection levels in mosquitoes, we compared dissection of the vector, Aedes polynesiensis, with the poolscreening polymerase chain reaction (PS-PCR) assay.

Methods: (1) Mosquitoes were collected in human landing catches in five areas in Moorea island, French Polynesia. (2) A fraction of the captured mosquitoes was dissected for Wuchereria bancrofti larvae. (3) Laboratory-reared mosquitoes (uninfected as well as experimentally infected ones) were repeatedly tested to optimize a PS-PCR protocol (DNA extracts from 1-50 pooled mosquitoes were tested with an internal standardized system and primers specific for the Ssp1 repeat sequence. PCR products were analysed by gel electrophoresis). (4) Another fraction of the captured mosquitoes was assayed by PS-PCR according the optimized protocol.

Results: The prevalence of field-mosquito infection with W. bancrofti ranged from 1 to 8 % by dissection (L1-L3) and point estimates of infection prevalence, as assayed by PS-PCR, ranged from 0.4 to 3.7 %. There was a moderately strong correlation between larval infection rates as determined by dissection and PCR.

Discussion: Our results suggest that the PS-PCR assay is specific and highly sensitive for detecting parasite DNA. We obtained similar although not identical results with dissections of mosquitoes. PS-PCR appears to be adequate for testing large numbers of mosquitoes in the context of filariasis elimination programs. The role and advantages of using entomologic methods to monitor filariasis programs are discussed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

PCR和解剖法在法属波利尼西亚监测波利尼西亚伊蚊丝虫感染。
背景:昆虫学方法可为法属波利尼西亚丝虫病传播监测提供重要工具。为了规范我们的PCR方法,完善我们评估蚊子丝虫病感染水平的方案,我们将媒介波利尼西亚伊蚊的解剖与池筛选聚合酶链反应(PS-PCR)试验进行了比较。方法:(1)在法属波利尼西亚Moorea岛5个地区进行人落网捕蚊。(2)部分捕获的蚊类经解剖检查为班氏武切氏菌幼虫。(3)对实验室饲养的蚊子(未感染和实验感染的蚊子)进行重复检测,优化PS-PCR方案(1-50只蚊子的DNA提取液采用内部标准化系统和Ssp1重复序列特异性引物进行检测)。PCR产物经凝胶电泳分析)。(4)按优化方案对捕获的另一部分蚊虫进行PS-PCR检测。结果:经解剖(L1-L3)鉴定,班氏伊蚊感染率为1% ~ 8%,PS-PCR点估计感染率为0.4% ~ 3.7%。通过解剖和聚合酶链反应测定,幼虫感染率之间存在中等强度的相关性。讨论:我们的结果表明,PS-PCR检测寄生虫DNA具有特异性和高灵敏度。我们对蚊子的解剖得到了类似的结果,尽管不完全相同。PS-PCR似乎足以在消除丝虫病规划的背景下检测大量蚊子。讨论了利用昆虫学方法监测丝虫病项目的作用和优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信