Myocardial contrast echocardiography in the evaluation of myocardial perfusion in patients with left bundle branch block and coronary artery disease.

Salvatore Felis, Wanda Deste, Paolo Colonna, Antonella Ragusa, Salvatore Scandura, Daniele Giannotta, Sabino Iliceto, Corrado Tamburino
{"title":"Myocardial contrast echocardiography in the evaluation of myocardial perfusion in patients with left bundle branch block and coronary artery disease.","authors":"Salvatore Felis,&nbsp;Wanda Deste,&nbsp;Paolo Colonna,&nbsp;Antonella Ragusa,&nbsp;Salvatore Scandura,&nbsp;Daniele Giannotta,&nbsp;Sabino Iliceto,&nbsp;Corrado Tamburino","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), conventional tests such as electrocardiography and myocardial scintigraphy poorly evaluate coronary artery disease. It has been reported that myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) is capable of identifying patients with a postinfarction contractile reserve and myocardial functional recovery, also allowing the early identification of late left ventricular remodeling. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, retrospectively, myocardial perfusion in selected patients with LBBB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty patients (mean age 56 +/- 8 years) with LBBB, 15 with normal coronary arteries at angiography and 15 with a previous myocardial infarction and a critical one-vessel residual stenosis at angiography, underwent MCE from June 2000 to May 2001. MCE results were compared with rest thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 15 LBBB patients with normal coronary arteries, MCE demonstrated normal perfusion in 14 patients, whereas 1 subject showed an impairment of septal perfusion. In the same group, rest thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy showed an impaired septal perfusion in 14 patients, whereas 1 subject had a normal perfusion (MCE specificity 93% vs myocardial scintigraphy specificity 7%). Among 15 LBBB patients with coronary artery disease, MCE correctly identified a contrast defect in 14/15 patients, whereas rest thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy demonstrated a perfusion defect in 15/15 patients (MCE sensitivity 93% vs scintigraphy sensitivity 100%). The two techniques showed a good agreement as for myocardial perfusion in the anterior wall (86.6% anterobasal; 86.6% mid-anterior; 80% distal anterior), the inferior wall (86.6%), the distal segment of the posterior lateral wall (83.3%), but a low concordance was found as for the basal septum (16.6%) and middistal septum (33.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MCE allows a diagnostic benefit in the detection of microvascular damage in patients with LBBB and unknown coronary artery disease, also in the presence of discordance with rest thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy.</p>","PeriodicalId":80289,"journal":{"name":"Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology","volume":"6 12","pages":"956-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), conventional tests such as electrocardiography and myocardial scintigraphy poorly evaluate coronary artery disease. It has been reported that myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) is capable of identifying patients with a postinfarction contractile reserve and myocardial functional recovery, also allowing the early identification of late left ventricular remodeling. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, retrospectively, myocardial perfusion in selected patients with LBBB.

Methods: Thirty patients (mean age 56 +/- 8 years) with LBBB, 15 with normal coronary arteries at angiography and 15 with a previous myocardial infarction and a critical one-vessel residual stenosis at angiography, underwent MCE from June 2000 to May 2001. MCE results were compared with rest thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy.

Results: Among 15 LBBB patients with normal coronary arteries, MCE demonstrated normal perfusion in 14 patients, whereas 1 subject showed an impairment of septal perfusion. In the same group, rest thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy showed an impaired septal perfusion in 14 patients, whereas 1 subject had a normal perfusion (MCE specificity 93% vs myocardial scintigraphy specificity 7%). Among 15 LBBB patients with coronary artery disease, MCE correctly identified a contrast defect in 14/15 patients, whereas rest thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy demonstrated a perfusion defect in 15/15 patients (MCE sensitivity 93% vs scintigraphy sensitivity 100%). The two techniques showed a good agreement as for myocardial perfusion in the anterior wall (86.6% anterobasal; 86.6% mid-anterior; 80% distal anterior), the inferior wall (86.6%), the distal segment of the posterior lateral wall (83.3%), but a low concordance was found as for the basal septum (16.6%) and middistal septum (33.3%).

Conclusions: MCE allows a diagnostic benefit in the detection of microvascular damage in patients with LBBB and unknown coronary artery disease, also in the presence of discordance with rest thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy.

心肌超声造影评价左束支阻滞和冠状动脉疾病患者心肌灌注的价值。
背景:在左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)患者中,心电图和心肌显像等常规检查对冠状动脉疾病的评价较差。据报道,心肌超声造影(MCE)能够识别梗死后收缩储备和心肌功能恢复的患者,也可以早期识别晚期左心室重构。本研究的目的是回顾性评价选定的LBBB患者的心肌灌注。方法:从2000年6月至2001年5月,30例LBBB患者(平均年龄56±8岁),15例冠脉造影显示冠状动脉正常,15例冠脉造影显示既往心肌梗死及严重单支残留狭窄。将MCE结果与其余铊-201心肌显像结果进行比较。结果:在15例冠状动脉正常的LBBB患者中,MCE显示14例灌注正常,1例出现间隔灌注损伤。在同一组中,其余铊-201心肌显像显示14例患者鼻中隔灌注受损,而1例患者灌注正常(MCE特异性93%,心肌显像特异性7%)。在15例伴有冠状动脉疾病的LBBB患者中,MCE正确识别了14/15患者的造影剂缺陷,而其余铊-201心肌显像显示灌注缺陷的患者为15/15 (MCE敏感性93% vs显像敏感性100%)。两种技术在前壁心肌灌注方面表现出良好的一致性(86.6%为前基底;mid-anterior 86.6%;80%远前段),下壁(86.6%),后侧壁远段(83.3%),但基底隔(16.6%)和中隔远端(33.3%)的一致性较低。结论:MCE在LBBB和未知冠状动脉疾病患者的微血管损伤检测中具有诊断优势,也可与其他铊-201心肌显像不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信