Is electric arc welding linked to manganism or Parkinson's disease?

Grant McMillan
{"title":"Is electric arc welding linked to manganism or Parkinson's disease?","authors":"Grant McMillan","doi":"10.2165/00139709-200524040-00004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Manganese and its inorganic compounds are widely used in many industries and have been accepted as occupational neurotoxins that have caused a distinct and disabling clinical entity, manganism, in several types of work, notably where exposure is by way of dust. There is inconclusive and inconsistent evidence that, in these occupations, subclinical neurological effects, detectable only by neurobehavioural studies, may be caused by low doses. This has prompted a re-evaluation of occupational exposure limits. Some countries, including the UK, already demand much higher levels of protection against exposure than 5 years ago. Welding is the most common source of occupational exposure as manganese is an essential component of steel and so its compounds are inevitable components of fume emitted from steel welding processes. There it is found in respirable particles, often as complex oxides (spinels), sometimes within a core protected by a silicon oxide shell - as distinct from the much simpler form of particle formed by disintegration in processes such as mining and ore milling where manganism has been diagnosed convincingly. Millions of workers are at risk of exposure to manganese-containing compounds in fumes from electric arc welding of steel. In recent years it has been asserted that neurological and neurobehavioural disorders may develop consequent to exposure to steel welding fumes and that employment as a welder is associated with the unusually early onset of Parkinson's disease. Causal relationships have been postulated. Welders have been recorded as having been exposed to high levels of manganese-containing fume, especially where they have worked in confined, unventilated spaces, although this appears from limited data to be the exception rather than the rule. Even then the dose received is generally less than in mining or ore crushing. When care is taken to exclude exposures from hardfacing and burning and cutting arc processes, where manganese may form a high percentage of the fume, manganese compounds usually form a relatively low percentage of the composition of welding fume particles, <2.0%, much outweighed by iron. Although these manganese-compound-containing welding fume particles are insoluble in water, the manganese compounds in particles that are retained in the alveoli may be absorbed, at least in part. Manganese concentrations in biological material samples in some exposed groups reflect this relative to unexposed workers. Some of the transfer systems for absorption and transport, including across the blood-brain barrier, are used in competition with iron which is present in abundance in welding fume. This may reduce absorption of manganese in welders and thus reduce the opportunity for sufficient doses to cause neurotoxicological consequences. Scrutiny of the literature covering the last 40 years has revealed only five cases that meet sufficient criteria for manganism to just cross the diagnostic threshold, and even then they carry a degree of doubt with them. This low incidence alone gives notice that welders have not been and are not at high risk of clinically apparent damage from exposure to manganese. If this needs to be further emphasised, there is the fact that the literature contains no confirmed cases of manganism in welders. Assertions of abnormal results in neurobehavioural studies of welders have raised the possibility of there being a subclinical form of manganism with loss of fine motor control as one of its features. While observations of such changes in workers in other industries have caused regulators in some countries to apply more stringent controls of exposure, as yet the results lack convincing consistency and there is no indication of any dose-effect relationship. If welding fume can have these motor effects it would be a heavy and perhaps career-ending blow to those affected. It would not be prudent to dismiss the warnings sounded by the results of studies of welders, no matter how flawed these investigations are, but wiser and better to act with vigour to reduce exposure and monitor the effectiveness of this additional protection whilst conducting high quality research to allow sound conclusions to be drawn as to whether there actually is a subclinical disorder. Idiopathic Parkinson's disease is a common disorder affecting 1-2% of those in the general population aged >65 years. It has been suggested, on flawed and contested evidence, not that welding causes the disease but rather that employment as a welder carries with it the risk of developing this disease at a younger age than if that trade had not been followed. Manganese in welding fume has been nominated as the neurotoxin. This may be biologically feasible if manganese destroys insufficient receptor cells to produce clinical manganism but sufficient to enhance the effects of a reduced supply of dopamine to give the manifestations of already developing idiopathic Parkinson's disease earlier in the course of destruction of the substantia nigra than if all receptors were intact.</p>","PeriodicalId":87031,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological reviews","volume":"24 4","pages":"237-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00139709-200524040-00004","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00139709-200524040-00004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

Manganese and its inorganic compounds are widely used in many industries and have been accepted as occupational neurotoxins that have caused a distinct and disabling clinical entity, manganism, in several types of work, notably where exposure is by way of dust. There is inconclusive and inconsistent evidence that, in these occupations, subclinical neurological effects, detectable only by neurobehavioural studies, may be caused by low doses. This has prompted a re-evaluation of occupational exposure limits. Some countries, including the UK, already demand much higher levels of protection against exposure than 5 years ago. Welding is the most common source of occupational exposure as manganese is an essential component of steel and so its compounds are inevitable components of fume emitted from steel welding processes. There it is found in respirable particles, often as complex oxides (spinels), sometimes within a core protected by a silicon oxide shell - as distinct from the much simpler form of particle formed by disintegration in processes such as mining and ore milling where manganism has been diagnosed convincingly. Millions of workers are at risk of exposure to manganese-containing compounds in fumes from electric arc welding of steel. In recent years it has been asserted that neurological and neurobehavioural disorders may develop consequent to exposure to steel welding fumes and that employment as a welder is associated with the unusually early onset of Parkinson's disease. Causal relationships have been postulated. Welders have been recorded as having been exposed to high levels of manganese-containing fume, especially where they have worked in confined, unventilated spaces, although this appears from limited data to be the exception rather than the rule. Even then the dose received is generally less than in mining or ore crushing. When care is taken to exclude exposures from hardfacing and burning and cutting arc processes, where manganese may form a high percentage of the fume, manganese compounds usually form a relatively low percentage of the composition of welding fume particles, <2.0%, much outweighed by iron. Although these manganese-compound-containing welding fume particles are insoluble in water, the manganese compounds in particles that are retained in the alveoli may be absorbed, at least in part. Manganese concentrations in biological material samples in some exposed groups reflect this relative to unexposed workers. Some of the transfer systems for absorption and transport, including across the blood-brain barrier, are used in competition with iron which is present in abundance in welding fume. This may reduce absorption of manganese in welders and thus reduce the opportunity for sufficient doses to cause neurotoxicological consequences. Scrutiny of the literature covering the last 40 years has revealed only five cases that meet sufficient criteria for manganism to just cross the diagnostic threshold, and even then they carry a degree of doubt with them. This low incidence alone gives notice that welders have not been and are not at high risk of clinically apparent damage from exposure to manganese. If this needs to be further emphasised, there is the fact that the literature contains no confirmed cases of manganism in welders. Assertions of abnormal results in neurobehavioural studies of welders have raised the possibility of there being a subclinical form of manganism with loss of fine motor control as one of its features. While observations of such changes in workers in other industries have caused regulators in some countries to apply more stringent controls of exposure, as yet the results lack convincing consistency and there is no indication of any dose-effect relationship. If welding fume can have these motor effects it would be a heavy and perhaps career-ending blow to those affected. It would not be prudent to dismiss the warnings sounded by the results of studies of welders, no matter how flawed these investigations are, but wiser and better to act with vigour to reduce exposure and monitor the effectiveness of this additional protection whilst conducting high quality research to allow sound conclusions to be drawn as to whether there actually is a subclinical disorder. Idiopathic Parkinson's disease is a common disorder affecting 1-2% of those in the general population aged >65 years. It has been suggested, on flawed and contested evidence, not that welding causes the disease but rather that employment as a welder carries with it the risk of developing this disease at a younger age than if that trade had not been followed. Manganese in welding fume has been nominated as the neurotoxin. This may be biologically feasible if manganese destroys insufficient receptor cells to produce clinical manganism but sufficient to enhance the effects of a reduced supply of dopamine to give the manifestations of already developing idiopathic Parkinson's disease earlier in the course of destruction of the substantia nigra than if all receptors were intact.

电弧焊与锰中毒或帕金森症有关吗?
锰及其无机化合物广泛应用于许多工业,并已被认为是职业性神经毒素,在几种类型的工作中,特别是通过粉尘接触的工作中,已引起明显的和致残的临床实体锰。有不确定和不一致的证据表明,在这些职业中,只有通过神经行为研究才能检测到的亚临床神经效应可能是由低剂量引起的。这促使对职业暴露限值进行重新评估。包括英国在内的一些国家已经要求比5年前更高的防护水平。焊接是最常见的职业暴露源,因为锰是钢的基本成分,因此其化合物是钢焊接过程中排放的烟雾不可避免的成分。在那里,锰存在于可呼吸的颗粒中,通常是复杂的氧化物(尖晶石),有时在由氧化硅外壳保护的核心中,这与在采矿和磨矿等过程中由分解形成的更简单的颗粒形式不同,在这些过程中,锰已被令人信服地诊断出来。数以百万计的工人面临着接触钢的电弧焊产生的烟雾中含锰化合物的危险。近年来,有人断言,接触钢铁焊接烟雾可能导致神经和神经行为障碍,而作为焊工的工作与帕金森病异常早发有关。因果关系已被假定。有记录显示,焊工暴露在高水平的含锰烟雾中,特别是在密闭、不通风的空间工作时,尽管从有限的数据来看,这似乎是例外,而不是规则。即便如此,接受的剂量通常也比采矿或矿石破碎时要少。当注意排除堆焊和燃烧和切割电弧过程中的暴露时,其中锰可能形成高百分比的烟雾,锰化合物通常形成焊接烟雾颗粒组成的相对低百分比,65年。根据有缺陷和有争议的证据,有人认为,并不是焊接导致了这种疾病,而是作为一名焊工,与没有从事这一行业相比,在更年轻的时候患这种疾病的风险更大。焊接烟尘中的锰被认为是神经毒素。如果锰破坏的受体细胞不足以产生临床锰,但足以增强多巴胺供应减少的作用,从而在黑质破坏过程中比所有受体完好的情况下更早地出现已经发展的特发性帕金森病的表现,这在生物学上可能是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信