Central Nervous System Drug Development: An Integrative Biomarker Approach toward Individualized Medicine

B. Gomez-Mancilla M.D., Ph.D., E. Marrer, J. Kehren, A. Kinnunen, G. Imbert, R. Hillebrand, M. Bergström, M.E. Schmidt
{"title":"Central Nervous System Drug Development: An Integrative Biomarker Approach toward Individualized Medicine","authors":"B. Gomez-Mancilla M.D., Ph.D.,&nbsp;E. Marrer,&nbsp;J. Kehren,&nbsp;A. Kinnunen,&nbsp;G. Imbert,&nbsp;R. Hillebrand,&nbsp;M. Bergström,&nbsp;M.E. Schmidt","doi":"10.1602/neurorx.2.4.683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Drug development for CNS disorders faces the same formidable hurdles as other therapeutic areas: escalating development costs; novel drug targets with unproven therapeutic potential; and health care systems and regulatory agencies demanding more compelling demonstrations of the value of new drug products. Extensive clinical testing remains the core of registration of new compounds; however, traditional clinical trial methods are falling short in overcoming these development hurdles. The most common CNS disorders targeted for drug treatment are chronic, slowly vitiating processes manifested by highly subjective and context dependent signs and symptoms. With the exception of a few rare familial degenerative disorders, they have ill-defined or undefined pathophysiology. Samples selected for treatment trials using clinical criteria are inevitably heterogeneous, and dependence on traditional endpoints results in early proof-of-concept trials being long and large, with very poor signal to noise. It is no wonder that pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies are looking to biomarkers as an integral part of decision-making process supported by new technologies such as genetics, genomics, proteomics, and imaging as a mean of rationalizing CNS drug development. The present review represent an effort to illustrate the integration of such technologies in drug development supporting the path of individualized medicine.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87195,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRx : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics","volume":"2 4","pages":"Pages 683-695"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1602/neurorx.2.4.683","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRx : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1545534306701134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Drug development for CNS disorders faces the same formidable hurdles as other therapeutic areas: escalating development costs; novel drug targets with unproven therapeutic potential; and health care systems and regulatory agencies demanding more compelling demonstrations of the value of new drug products. Extensive clinical testing remains the core of registration of new compounds; however, traditional clinical trial methods are falling short in overcoming these development hurdles. The most common CNS disorders targeted for drug treatment are chronic, slowly vitiating processes manifested by highly subjective and context dependent signs and symptoms. With the exception of a few rare familial degenerative disorders, they have ill-defined or undefined pathophysiology. Samples selected for treatment trials using clinical criteria are inevitably heterogeneous, and dependence on traditional endpoints results in early proof-of-concept trials being long and large, with very poor signal to noise. It is no wonder that pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies are looking to biomarkers as an integral part of decision-making process supported by new technologies such as genetics, genomics, proteomics, and imaging as a mean of rationalizing CNS drug development. The present review represent an effort to illustrate the integration of such technologies in drug development supporting the path of individualized medicine.

中枢神经系统药物开发:面向个体化医学的综合生物标志物方法
与其他治疗领域一样,中枢神经系统疾病的药物开发面临着同样巨大的障碍:开发成本不断上升;具有未经证实的治疗潜力的新药物靶点;医疗保健系统和监管机构要求对新药的价值进行更有说服力的证明。广泛的临床试验仍然是新化合物注册的核心;然而,传统的临床试验方法在克服这些发展障碍方面存在不足。针对药物治疗的最常见中枢神经系统疾病是慢性的,缓慢的退化过程,表现为高度主观和环境依赖的体征和症状。除了少数罕见的家族性退行性疾病外,它们的病理生理不明确或不明确。使用临床标准的治疗试验所选择的样本不可避免地是异质的,对传统终点的依赖导致早期概念验证试验时间长、规模大,信噪比非常差。毫无疑问,制药和生物技术公司正将生物标志物视为决策过程中不可或缺的一部分,这些决策过程由遗传学、基因组学、蛋白质组学和成像等新技术支持,作为使中枢神经系统药物开发合理化的手段。目前的回顾是为了说明这些技术在药物开发中的整合,以支持个体化医疗的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信