The relationship between 24-hour integrated glucose concentrations and % glycohemoglobin

Youssef Hassan , Bradford Johnson , Nicole Nader , Mary C. Gannon , Frank Q. Nuttall
{"title":"The relationship between 24-hour integrated glucose concentrations and % glycohemoglobin","authors":"Youssef Hassan ,&nbsp;Bradford Johnson ,&nbsp;Nicole Nader ,&nbsp;Mary C. Gannon ,&nbsp;Frank Q. Nuttall","doi":"10.1016/j.lab.2005.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Objective: Since glycohemoglobin values are widely used clinically as a surrogate for average glucose concentration over an extended period of time, we decided to determine the actual relationship between 24-hour integrated glucose values and percent total glycohemoglobin (%tGHb) in cohorts of people with and without diabetes. Research Design and Methods: In 48 people without known diabetes with known stability of fasting glucose over a 1-year period of time, the calculated 24-hour integrated glucose concentration was compared with their %tGHb. In 15 normal young medical students, the glucose area response was determined from 46 venous blood samples obtained during a 24-hour period and compared with their %tGHb. In 18 people with type 2 diabetes, interstitial glucose concentrations were monitored using the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (Medtronic MiniMed, Inc., Sylmar, Calif) for 3 days at 20-day intervals over 100 days. %tGHb was performed at 20-day intervals simultaneously. In 29 people with untreated type 2 diabetes, glucose area response was determined from 46 venous blood samples obtained during a 24-hour period and compared with their %tGHb after being on a standardized diet provided to the subjects for at least 5 weeks. The %tGHb and 24-hour profiles were stable. Results: There was an excellent correlation between the mean 24-hour glucose concentration and the %tGHb among subjects with diabetes. The correlation was poor among subjects without diabetes. The relationship was curvilinear when plotted as a single group. Alternatively when data from subjects with or without diabetes were plotted separately, the slopes were identical but the y-intercepts were different. Conclusion: The relationship between the mean glucose concentration integrated over an extended period of time and the %tGHb is not linear. The reason for this nonlinearity remains to be determined. This non-linearity needs to be considered in the clinical interpretation of %tGHb (and probably HbA<sub>1c</sub>) in reference to glucose values.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine","volume":"147 1","pages":"Pages 21-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.lab.2005.05.009","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022214305002908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Objective: Since glycohemoglobin values are widely used clinically as a surrogate for average glucose concentration over an extended period of time, we decided to determine the actual relationship between 24-hour integrated glucose values and percent total glycohemoglobin (%tGHb) in cohorts of people with and without diabetes. Research Design and Methods: In 48 people without known diabetes with known stability of fasting glucose over a 1-year period of time, the calculated 24-hour integrated glucose concentration was compared with their %tGHb. In 15 normal young medical students, the glucose area response was determined from 46 venous blood samples obtained during a 24-hour period and compared with their %tGHb. In 18 people with type 2 diabetes, interstitial glucose concentrations were monitored using the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (Medtronic MiniMed, Inc., Sylmar, Calif) for 3 days at 20-day intervals over 100 days. %tGHb was performed at 20-day intervals simultaneously. In 29 people with untreated type 2 diabetes, glucose area response was determined from 46 venous blood samples obtained during a 24-hour period and compared with their %tGHb after being on a standardized diet provided to the subjects for at least 5 weeks. The %tGHb and 24-hour profiles were stable. Results: There was an excellent correlation between the mean 24-hour glucose concentration and the %tGHb among subjects with diabetes. The correlation was poor among subjects without diabetes. The relationship was curvilinear when plotted as a single group. Alternatively when data from subjects with or without diabetes were plotted separately, the slopes were identical but the y-intercepts were different. Conclusion: The relationship between the mean glucose concentration integrated over an extended period of time and the %tGHb is not linear. The reason for this nonlinearity remains to be determined. This non-linearity needs to be considered in the clinical interpretation of %tGHb (and probably HbA1c) in reference to glucose values.

24小时综合葡萄糖浓度与%糖蛋白的关系
目的:由于糖蛋白值在临床上被广泛用作长时间内平均葡萄糖浓度的替代指标,我们决定在糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者队列中确定24小时综合血糖值与总糖蛋白百分比(%tGHb)之间的实际关系。研究设计和方法:在48例已知无糖尿病且已知1年内空腹血糖稳定的患者中,计算出的24小时综合葡萄糖浓度与他们的%tGHb进行比较。在15名正常的年轻医学生中,从24小时内获得的46份静脉血样本中测定葡萄糖区反应,并与他们的%tGHb进行比较。在18名2型糖尿病患者中,使用连续血糖监测系统(Medtronic MiniMed, Inc., Sylmar, california)监测间质葡萄糖浓度,每隔20天监测3天,超过100天。%tGHb每隔20天同时进行一次。在29名未经治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,从24小时内获得的46份静脉血样本中测定葡萄糖区域反应,并将其与提供给受试者的标准化饮食至少5周后的%tGHb进行比较。%tGHb和24小时谱稳定。结果:糖尿病患者24小时平均血糖浓度与%tGHb有极好的相关性。非糖尿病受试者的相关性较差。当作为一个单独的群体绘制时,这种关系是曲线状的。另外,当患有或不患有糖尿病的受试者的数据分别绘制时,斜率相同,但y截距不同。结论:长期累积的平均葡萄糖浓度与%tGHb之间不是线性关系。这种非线性的原因还有待确定。在临床解释%tGHb(可能还有HbA1c)与葡萄糖值的关系时,需要考虑到这种非线性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信