Patient satisfaction with fixed partial dentures: a 5-year retrospective study.

Q2 Medicine
Singapore Dental Journal Pub Date : 2005-12-01
Ken Tan, Avery Z J Li, Edwin S Y Chan
{"title":"Patient satisfaction with fixed partial dentures: a 5-year retrospective study.","authors":"Ken Tan,&nbsp;Avery Z J Li,&nbsp;Edwin S Y Chan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aims of this retrospective study were to evaluate patient satisfaction with fixed partial dentures (FPDs) 5-8 years following placement and to assess their awareness of oral health and oral hygiene practices using a survey questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The questionnaire consisted of 15 statements on patients' subjective perception of treatment with FPDs. Patients' perceptions of clinical outcome in terms of aesthetics, masticatory efficiency, speech, and comfort of the FPD were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale. Another group of questions looked into patients' attitudes regarding oral hygiene measures; these responses were measured on a binary scale. A third group of questions determined patients' awareness of bleeding gingivae, and the final group of questions assessed if patients' expectations had been met, willingness to undergo the same treatment again and recommend it to others.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-five patients with 99 FPDs, treated between 5 and 8 years previously (mean, 6.1 years; median, 6.2 years), participated in the study. Mean follow-up time was 6.1 years. There were 87.9% of FPDs that were 3-4 units in design and 44% included anterior teeth. The 5-year survival of the FPDs was 92.3%. Patient satisfaction with the functional aspects of the FPDs was generally very high; 95% were definitely or somewhat satisfied with the aesthetic appearance, 96% with chewing comfort, and 100% with the ability to speak normally. Ninety-one percent found the costs to be definitely or somewhat reasonable. Ninety-nine percent felt that the treatment had definitely or somewhat turned out as they had expected, 95% would definitely or somewhat be willing to recommend the same treatment to friends, and 92% would undergo the same treatment again. Fifty-six percent of patients reported using some form of interdental aid and 86% reported being able to clean their prostheses without problems. However, 35% reported some bleeding around their prostheses during cleaning, and 74-78% of patients felt that bleeding around natural teeth and bridges during cleaning was only a minor problem or not a problem.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More than 90% of patients were satisfied with having missing teeth replaced with FPDs from a functional and aesthetic point of view. Costs were considered to be reasonable by the majority of patients and most would undergo the same treatment again and also recommend the treatment to others. Only about half of patients used some form of interdental cleaning and most were unaware of the significance of bleeding around the gingiva of natural teeth and FPDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":35891,"journal":{"name":"Singapore Dental Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":"23-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Singapore Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aims of this retrospective study were to evaluate patient satisfaction with fixed partial dentures (FPDs) 5-8 years following placement and to assess their awareness of oral health and oral hygiene practices using a survey questionnaire.

Methods: The questionnaire consisted of 15 statements on patients' subjective perception of treatment with FPDs. Patients' perceptions of clinical outcome in terms of aesthetics, masticatory efficiency, speech, and comfort of the FPD were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale. Another group of questions looked into patients' attitudes regarding oral hygiene measures; these responses were measured on a binary scale. A third group of questions determined patients' awareness of bleeding gingivae, and the final group of questions assessed if patients' expectations had been met, willingness to undergo the same treatment again and recommend it to others.

Results: Eighty-five patients with 99 FPDs, treated between 5 and 8 years previously (mean, 6.1 years; median, 6.2 years), participated in the study. Mean follow-up time was 6.1 years. There were 87.9% of FPDs that were 3-4 units in design and 44% included anterior teeth. The 5-year survival of the FPDs was 92.3%. Patient satisfaction with the functional aspects of the FPDs was generally very high; 95% were definitely or somewhat satisfied with the aesthetic appearance, 96% with chewing comfort, and 100% with the ability to speak normally. Ninety-one percent found the costs to be definitely or somewhat reasonable. Ninety-nine percent felt that the treatment had definitely or somewhat turned out as they had expected, 95% would definitely or somewhat be willing to recommend the same treatment to friends, and 92% would undergo the same treatment again. Fifty-six percent of patients reported using some form of interdental aid and 86% reported being able to clean their prostheses without problems. However, 35% reported some bleeding around their prostheses during cleaning, and 74-78% of patients felt that bleeding around natural teeth and bridges during cleaning was only a minor problem or not a problem.

Conclusion: More than 90% of patients were satisfied with having missing teeth replaced with FPDs from a functional and aesthetic point of view. Costs were considered to be reasonable by the majority of patients and most would undergo the same treatment again and also recommend the treatment to others. Only about half of patients used some form of interdental cleaning and most were unaware of the significance of bleeding around the gingiva of natural teeth and FPDs.

固定局部义齿患者满意度的5年回顾性研究。
目的:本回顾性研究的目的是评估患者在固定局部义齿(fpd)放置后5-8年的满意度,并通过调查问卷评估他们的口腔健康意识和口腔卫生习惯。方法:采用问卷调查法,对15项患者对fpd治疗的主观感受进行问卷调查。患者对FPD的美学、咀嚼效率、言语和舒适度方面的临床结果的感知以4分的顺序评分。另一组问题调查了患者对口腔卫生措施的态度;这些反应是用二元量表来测量的。第三组问题确定了患者对牙龈出血的意识,最后一组问题评估了患者的期望是否得到满足,是否愿意再次接受同样的治疗并向他人推荐。结果:85例99例FPDs患者,治疗时间为5 - 8年(平均6.1年;中位数(6.2岁),参与研究。平均随访时间6.1年。87.9%的fpd设计为3-4个单元,44%的fpd包括前牙。fpd的5年生存率为92.3%。患者对fpd功能方面的满意度普遍很高;95%的人对美观满意,96%的人对咀嚼舒适满意,100%的人对正常说话的能力满意。91%的人认为成本绝对合理或有些合理。99%的人认为治疗肯定或多少达到了他们预期的效果,95%的人肯定或多少愿意向朋友推荐同样的治疗方法,92%的人愿意再次接受同样的治疗。56%的患者报告使用某种形式的牙间辅助设备,86%的患者报告能够毫无问题地清洁他们的假体。然而,35%的患者报告在清洁过程中修复体周围出血,74-78%的患者认为在清洁过程中自然牙和桥周围出血只是一个小问题或不是问题。结论:90%以上的患者从功能和美观角度对补牙满意。大多数患者认为费用是合理的,大多数人会再次接受同样的治疗,并向其他人推荐这种治疗。只有大约一半的患者使用某种形式的牙间清洁,大多数人不知道天然牙和假牙牙龈周围出血的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Singapore Dental Journal
Singapore Dental Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The scope of the journal covers all fields related to the presentday practice of dentistry, and includes Restorative Dentistry (Operative Dentistry, Dental Materials, Prosthodontics and Endodontics), Preventive Dentistry (Periodontics, Orthodontics, Paediatric Dentistry, Public Health and Health Services), Oral Medicine, Oral Surgery and Oral Pathology. Articles pertaining to dental education and the social, political and economic aspects of dental practice are also welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信