Specificity controls for immunocytochemistry.

Anatomy and Embryology Pub Date : 2006-08-01 Epub Date: 2006-01-25 DOI:10.1007/s00429-005-0077-6
S Holmseth, K P Lehre, N C Danbolt
{"title":"Specificity controls for immunocytochemistry.","authors":"S Holmseth,&nbsp;K P Lehre,&nbsp;N C Danbolt","doi":"10.1007/s00429-005-0077-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antibodies have been in widespread use for more than three decades as invaluable tools for the specific detection of proteins or other molecules in biological samples. In spite of such a long experience, the field of immunocytochemistry is still troubled by spurious results due to insufficient specificity of antibodies or procedures used. The importance of keeping a high standard is increasing because massive sequencing of entire genomes leads to the identification of numerous new proteins. All the identified proteins and their variants will have to be localized precisely and quantitatively at high resolution throughout the development of all species. Consequently, antibody generation and immunocytochemical investigations will be done on a large scale. It will be economically important to secure an optimal balance between the risk of publishing erroneous data (which are expensive to correct) and the costs of specificity testing. Because proofs of specificity are never absolute, but rather represent failures to detect crossreactivity, there is no limit to the number of control experiments that can be performed. The aims of the present paper are to increase the awareness of the difficulties in proving the specificity of immunocytochemical labeling and to initiate a discussion on optimized standards. The main points are: (1) antibodies should be described properly, (2) the labeling obtained with an antibody to a single epitope needs additional verification and (3) the investigators should be required to outline in detail how they arrive at the conclusion that the immunocytochemical labeling is specific.</p>","PeriodicalId":7806,"journal":{"name":"Anatomy and Embryology","volume":"211 4","pages":"257-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00429-005-0077-6","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomy and Embryology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-005-0077-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2006/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Antibodies have been in widespread use for more than three decades as invaluable tools for the specific detection of proteins or other molecules in biological samples. In spite of such a long experience, the field of immunocytochemistry is still troubled by spurious results due to insufficient specificity of antibodies or procedures used. The importance of keeping a high standard is increasing because massive sequencing of entire genomes leads to the identification of numerous new proteins. All the identified proteins and their variants will have to be localized precisely and quantitatively at high resolution throughout the development of all species. Consequently, antibody generation and immunocytochemical investigations will be done on a large scale. It will be economically important to secure an optimal balance between the risk of publishing erroneous data (which are expensive to correct) and the costs of specificity testing. Because proofs of specificity are never absolute, but rather represent failures to detect crossreactivity, there is no limit to the number of control experiments that can be performed. The aims of the present paper are to increase the awareness of the difficulties in proving the specificity of immunocytochemical labeling and to initiate a discussion on optimized standards. The main points are: (1) antibodies should be described properly, (2) the labeling obtained with an antibody to a single epitope needs additional verification and (3) the investigators should be required to outline in detail how they arrive at the conclusion that the immunocytochemical labeling is specific.

免疫细胞化学特异性控制。
抗体作为生物样品中蛋白质或其他分子特异性检测的宝贵工具,已经被广泛使用了三十多年。尽管有这么长的经验,免疫细胞化学领域仍然受到由于抗体特异性不足或使用的程序而导致的虚假结果的困扰。保持高标准的重要性正在增加,因为整个基因组的大规模测序导致许多新蛋白质的鉴定。在所有物种的发育过程中,所有已鉴定的蛋白质及其变体都必须精确地、定量地、高分辨率地定位。因此,抗体生成和免疫细胞化学研究将大规模进行。在发表错误数据的风险(纠正错误的成本很高)和特异性测试的成本之间取得最佳平衡,在经济上是很重要的。因为特异性的证明从来都不是绝对的,而是代表检测到交叉反应性的失败,所以可以进行的对照实验的数量没有限制。本文的目的是提高人们对证明免疫细胞化学标记特异性的困难的认识,并开始讨论优化的标准。要点是:(1)抗体应该被恰当地描述,(2)抗体对单个表位的标记需要额外的验证,(3)研究人员应该被要求详细概述他们是如何得出免疫细胞化学标记是特异性的结论的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信