Patients' expectations about the benefit of antibiotic treatment: lessons from a randomised controlled trial.

Jim Young, Christa Hugenschmidt, Antje Welge-Lüssen, Heiner C Bucher, Peter Tschudi, Pierre Périat
{"title":"Patients' expectations about the benefit of antibiotic treatment: lessons from a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Jim Young,&nbsp;Christa Hugenschmidt,&nbsp;Antje Welge-Lüssen,&nbsp;Heiner C Bucher,&nbsp;Peter Tschudi,&nbsp;Pierre Périat","doi":"10.1159/000089093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient expectations may be an important component of a placebo effect, and yet few studies assess how patients' pre-existing expectations affect subsequent health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To estimate the association between patients' expectations and time to cure in patients with clinically diagnosed acute bacterial rhinosinusitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomised controlled trial, expectations about the benefit of an antibiotic therapy were measured prior to treatment with either an antibiotic or placebo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the patients asked for consent, 64% refused mostly because they either wanted or did not want to receive antibiotics. Over 25% of the patients who gave consent were ambivalent about the benefit of antibiotic therapy. Predictably there was no evidence of an association between expectations and time to cure in those that gave consent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Selection bias occurs if patients with strong expectations refuse to participate in a trial and if the success of the intervention depends in part on a patient's expectations. Methods that adjust for selection bias are recommended for trials where placebo effects are either of interest or could be an important component of an intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":80278,"journal":{"name":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin und klassische Naturheilkunde = Research in complementary and natural classical medicine","volume":"12 6","pages":"347-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000089093","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin und klassische Naturheilkunde = Research in complementary and natural classical medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000089093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2005/12/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Patient expectations may be an important component of a placebo effect, and yet few studies assess how patients' pre-existing expectations affect subsequent health outcomes.

Objectives: To estimate the association between patients' expectations and time to cure in patients with clinically diagnosed acute bacterial rhinosinusitis.

Methods: In a randomised controlled trial, expectations about the benefit of an antibiotic therapy were measured prior to treatment with either an antibiotic or placebo.

Results: Of the patients asked for consent, 64% refused mostly because they either wanted or did not want to receive antibiotics. Over 25% of the patients who gave consent were ambivalent about the benefit of antibiotic therapy. Predictably there was no evidence of an association between expectations and time to cure in those that gave consent.

Conclusions: Selection bias occurs if patients with strong expectations refuse to participate in a trial and if the success of the intervention depends in part on a patient's expectations. Methods that adjust for selection bias are recommended for trials where placebo effects are either of interest or could be an important component of an intervention.

患者对抗生素治疗益处的期望:来自随机对照试验的经验教训。
背景:患者期望可能是安慰剂效应的一个重要组成部分,然而很少有研究评估患者先前的期望如何影响随后的健康结果。目的:评估临床诊断为急性细菌性鼻窦炎患者的期望与治愈时间之间的关系。方法:在一项随机对照试验中,在使用抗生素或安慰剂治疗之前测量对抗生素治疗获益的预期。结果:在要求同意的患者中,64%的患者拒绝,主要原因是希望或不希望接受抗生素治疗。超过25%的同意患者对抗生素治疗的益处持矛盾态度。可以预见的是,在那些同意治疗的患者中,没有证据表明期望和治疗时间之间存在关联。结论:如果有强烈期望的患者拒绝参加试验,如果干预的成功部分取决于患者的期望,就会发生选择偏倚。对于安慰剂效应有兴趣或可能是干预的重要组成部分的试验,建议采用调整选择偏倚的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信