Polygenic epilepsy.

Advances in neurology Pub Date : 2006-01-01
Thomas N Ferraro, Russell J Buono
{"title":"Polygenic epilepsy.","authors":"Thomas N Ferraro,&nbsp;Russell J Buono","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current perspective on the etiology of common forms of epilepsy reflects clinical and preclinical data that document a complex determinism involving multiple gene variations and environmental influences. This multifactorial architecture precludes effective use of conventional types of genetic analysis and requires application of alternative methods. Presently, such methods are based on candidate gene studies, and it is likely that these approaches will continue to be useful in the near term. Long-range strategies will combine traditional linkage methods with single nucleotide polymorphism gene maps and will seek to collect data on a genomic scale in the search for gene variation that influences both the development of epilepsy and the response to antiepileptic medication. Such studies will require large numbers of patients and controls and also valid, standardized clinical criteria for parsing patients into phenotypic categories. Animal models will continue to provide clues regarding potentially important candidate genes and can also be used in a reverse-translational manner to confirm and study the effects of gene variation that is identified in humans. In the end, genetic research approaches to common forms of human epilepsy will enhance understanding of underlying neurobiological mechanisms, and through this understanding will come new treatment options, new molecular markers to improve current diagnostic criteria, and new genetic tests for predicting drug efficacy in patients with epilepsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7356,"journal":{"name":"Advances in neurology","volume":"97 ","pages":"389-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current perspective on the etiology of common forms of epilepsy reflects clinical and preclinical data that document a complex determinism involving multiple gene variations and environmental influences. This multifactorial architecture precludes effective use of conventional types of genetic analysis and requires application of alternative methods. Presently, such methods are based on candidate gene studies, and it is likely that these approaches will continue to be useful in the near term. Long-range strategies will combine traditional linkage methods with single nucleotide polymorphism gene maps and will seek to collect data on a genomic scale in the search for gene variation that influences both the development of epilepsy and the response to antiepileptic medication. Such studies will require large numbers of patients and controls and also valid, standardized clinical criteria for parsing patients into phenotypic categories. Animal models will continue to provide clues regarding potentially important candidate genes and can also be used in a reverse-translational manner to confirm and study the effects of gene variation that is identified in humans. In the end, genetic research approaches to common forms of human epilepsy will enhance understanding of underlying neurobiological mechanisms, and through this understanding will come new treatment options, new molecular markers to improve current diagnostic criteria, and new genetic tests for predicting drug efficacy in patients with epilepsy.

多基因的癫痫。
目前对常见形式癫痫病因的看法反映了临床和临床前数据,这些数据记录了涉及多种基因变异和环境影响的复杂决定论。这种多因子结构排除了传统类型遗传分析的有效使用,需要应用替代方法。目前,这些方法是基于候选基因的研究,这些方法很可能在短期内继续有用。长期策略将结合传统的连锁方法与单核苷酸多态性基因图谱,并将寻求在基因组尺度上收集数据,以寻找影响癫痫发展和抗癫痫药物反应的基因变异。这样的研究将需要大量的患者和对照,以及有效的、标准化的临床标准来分析患者的表型类别。动物模型将继续提供关于潜在重要候选基因的线索,也可以用反向翻译的方式来确认和研究在人类中发现的基因变异的影响。最后,对人类癫痫常见形式的基因研究方法将加强对潜在神经生物学机制的理解,并通过这种理解带来新的治疗选择,新的分子标记来改进当前的诊断标准,以及新的基因测试来预测癫痫患者的药物疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信