Drug-eluting stents for the treatment of in-stent restenosis--'real world' double centre experience in consecutive patients.

Richard A Anderson, Farzin Fath-Ordoubadi, Sheraz Younas, Anthony Bainbridge, Rosie A Swallow, Keith D Dawkins, Nicholas P Curzen
{"title":"Drug-eluting stents for the treatment of in-stent restenosis--'real world' double centre experience in consecutive patients.","authors":"Richard A Anderson,&nbsp;Farzin Fath-Ordoubadi,&nbsp;Sheraz Younas,&nbsp;Anthony Bainbridge,&nbsp;Rosie A Swallow,&nbsp;Keith D Dawkins,&nbsp;Nicholas P Curzen","doi":"10.1080/14628840500466687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We evaluated clinical outcome of consecutive patients with in stent restenosis (ISR) treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) at two intervention centres from April 2002 to April 2004, reflecting 'real world' practice.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>ISR is the major limitation to successful long-term outcome after implantation of bare metal stents during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The optimal strategy for the treatment of ISR has yet to be determined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>121 consecutive patients with significant ISR were treated with DES. Sirolimus DES were used in 60 patients and paclitaxel DES in the remainder. All patients were followed up to evaluate the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), angina class and clinically driven angiography. Data were collected between 7 and 27 months after the procedure (mean follow up of 16.5 months).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall MACE rate at 16.5 months was 13.2% (16 patients) including 4 deaths (3%). Fifteen (12.3%) patients underwent clinically driven angiography. Eight patients (6.6%) developed ISR within the treated segment, of whom, four underwent further PCI and 4 CABG. Mean Canadian angina class decreased from 2.46+/-0.7 pre-procedure to 0.69+/-0.6 at follow up. All patients achieved an improvement in angina, with 59% being rendered angina free and 87% free of MACE. There were no differences in clinical outcome in those who received a paclitaxel and sirolimus DES.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of DES implantation for the treatment of ISR is safe, effective and associated with low recurrence rates in a 'real world' large cohort of patients with a complex mix of anatomical and clinical factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":83747,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiovascular interventions","volume":"7 4","pages":"188-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14628840500466687","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiovascular interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14628840500466687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated clinical outcome of consecutive patients with in stent restenosis (ISR) treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) at two intervention centres from April 2002 to April 2004, reflecting 'real world' practice.

Background: ISR is the major limitation to successful long-term outcome after implantation of bare metal stents during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The optimal strategy for the treatment of ISR has yet to be determined.

Methods: 121 consecutive patients with significant ISR were treated with DES. Sirolimus DES were used in 60 patients and paclitaxel DES in the remainder. All patients were followed up to evaluate the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), angina class and clinically driven angiography. Data were collected between 7 and 27 months after the procedure (mean follow up of 16.5 months).

Results: Overall MACE rate at 16.5 months was 13.2% (16 patients) including 4 deaths (3%). Fifteen (12.3%) patients underwent clinically driven angiography. Eight patients (6.6%) developed ISR within the treated segment, of whom, four underwent further PCI and 4 CABG. Mean Canadian angina class decreased from 2.46+/-0.7 pre-procedure to 0.69+/-0.6 at follow up. All patients achieved an improvement in angina, with 59% being rendered angina free and 87% free of MACE. There were no differences in clinical outcome in those who received a paclitaxel and sirolimus DES.

Conclusions: The use of DES implantation for the treatment of ISR is safe, effective and associated with low recurrence rates in a 'real world' large cohort of patients with a complex mix of anatomical and clinical factors.

药物洗脱支架治疗支架内再狭窄——连续患者的“真实世界”双中心经验
目的:我们评估了2002年4月至2004年4月在两个干预中心连续接受药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗的支架内再狭窄(ISR)患者的临床结果,反映了“现实世界”的实践。背景:ISR是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)过程中裸金属支架植入成功的主要限制因素。治疗ISR的最佳策略尚未确定。方法:连续121例明显ISR患者采用DES治疗,60例采用西罗莫司DES,其余采用紫杉醇DES。对所有患者进行随访,评估主要不良心脏事件(MACE)发生率、心绞痛分级及临床驱动血管造影。数据收集于手术后7 - 27个月(平均随访16.5个月)。结果:16.5个月时总体MACE率为13.2%(16例),其中4例死亡(3%)。15例(12.3%)患者接受了临床驱动的血管造影。8例(6.6%)患者在治疗段内发生ISR,其中4例进一步行PCI和4例CABG。加拿大平均心绞痛等级从术前的2.46+/-0.7降至随访时的0.69+/-0.6。所有患者心绞痛均得到改善,59%的患者心绞痛消失,87%的患者无MACE。结论:在具有复杂解剖和临床因素的“现实世界”大队列患者中,使用DES植入治疗ISR是安全、有效的,并且复发率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书