Attentional load of the primary task influences the frontal but not the temporal generators of mismatch negativity

Domenico Restuccia , Giacomo Della Marca , Camillo Marra , Marco Rubino , Massimiliano Valeriani
{"title":"Attentional load of the primary task influences the frontal but not the temporal generators of mismatch negativity","authors":"Domenico Restuccia ,&nbsp;Giacomo Della Marca ,&nbsp;Camillo Marra ,&nbsp;Marco Rubino ,&nbsp;Massimiliano Valeriani","doi":"10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>According to the model hypothesized by Näätänen and Michie (Biol Psychol 1979; 8: 81–136), the generation of the mismatch negativity (MMN) requires a mismatch detection, taking place in temporal areas, followed by the activation of frontal generators, underlying attention switching toward the deviant stimulus. We aimed at verifying whether the activation of temporal and frontal regions is dependent on the amount of attentional resources allocable toward the deviant stimulus. We recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) in nine healthy subjects while reading and during a demanding visual task (Multiple Features Target Cancellation, MFTC). Raw data were further evaluated by Brain Electrical Source Analysis (BESA). During the Reading condition, distraction toward the unattended auditory stimuli was reflected by the enhancement of the N1 response to frequent stimuli and by the elicitation of a P3a response to deviant ones. The MMN distribution was explained by bilateral temporal dipoles. During the MFTC condition, no P3a was detected, while source analysis showed the activation of a right frontal generator. Temporal dipoles showed no change between the two conditions: we thus conclude that the earlier mismatch detection is independent on the attentional load. By contrast, the activation of a right frontal subcomponent occurred only during the high-load task, independently on any actual </span>attention shift reflected by the P3a component. We thus discuss the hypothesis whether the right frontal MMN generator, rather than subserving a simple attention switching toward the deviant stimulus, plays a role in modulating the auditory change detection system (“contrast enhancement” model).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100287,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Brain Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.023","citationCount":"77","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926641005002934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 77

Abstract

According to the model hypothesized by Näätänen and Michie (Biol Psychol 1979; 8: 81–136), the generation of the mismatch negativity (MMN) requires a mismatch detection, taking place in temporal areas, followed by the activation of frontal generators, underlying attention switching toward the deviant stimulus. We aimed at verifying whether the activation of temporal and frontal regions is dependent on the amount of attentional resources allocable toward the deviant stimulus. We recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) in nine healthy subjects while reading and during a demanding visual task (Multiple Features Target Cancellation, MFTC). Raw data were further evaluated by Brain Electrical Source Analysis (BESA). During the Reading condition, distraction toward the unattended auditory stimuli was reflected by the enhancement of the N1 response to frequent stimuli and by the elicitation of a P3a response to deviant ones. The MMN distribution was explained by bilateral temporal dipoles. During the MFTC condition, no P3a was detected, while source analysis showed the activation of a right frontal generator. Temporal dipoles showed no change between the two conditions: we thus conclude that the earlier mismatch detection is independent on the attentional load. By contrast, the activation of a right frontal subcomponent occurred only during the high-load task, independently on any actual attention shift reflected by the P3a component. We thus discuss the hypothesis whether the right frontal MMN generator, rather than subserving a simple attention switching toward the deviant stimulus, plays a role in modulating the auditory change detection system (“contrast enhancement” model).

主要任务的注意负荷影响错配负性的额叶产生,但不影响时间产生
根据Näätänen和Michie (Biol Psychol 1979;8: 81-136),失配负性(MMN)的产生需要在颞区进行失配检测,随后激活额叶发电机,从而使注意力转向异常刺激。我们旨在验证颞叶和额叶区域的激活是否依赖于分配给异常刺激的注意资源的数量。我们记录了9名健康受试者在阅读和高要求视觉任务时的事件相关电位(erp)。采用脑电源分析(BESA)对原始数据进行进一步评价。在阅读条件下,对无人注意的听觉刺激的注意力分散表现为对频繁刺激的N1反应增强和对异常刺激的P3a反应的激发。MMN分布可以用双侧时间偶极子来解释。在MFTC条件下,没有检测到P3a,而源分析显示右侧额叶发生器被激活。时间偶极子在两种情况下没有变化:我们因此得出结论,早期的错配检测与注意负荷无关。相比之下,右额叶子成分的激活只发生在高负荷任务期间,独立于P3a成分反映的任何实际注意力转移。因此,我们讨论了右侧额叶MMN发生器是否在调节听觉变化检测系统(“对比度增强”模型)中发挥作用,而不是服务于向异常刺激的简单注意力转换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信