Weights and measures: A new look at bisection behaviour in neglect

Robert D. McIntosh , Igor Schindler , Daniel Birchall , A. David Milner
{"title":"Weights and measures: A new look at bisection behaviour in neglect","authors":"Robert D. McIntosh ,&nbsp;Igor Schindler ,&nbsp;Daniel Birchall ,&nbsp;A. David Milner","doi":"10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Horizontal line bisection is a ubiquitous task in the investigation of visual neglect. Patients with left neglect typically make rightward errors that increase with line length and for lines at more leftward positions. For short lines, or for lines presented in right space, these errors may ‘cross over’ to become leftward. We have taken a new approach to these phenomena by employing a different set of dependent and independent variables for their description. Rather than recording bisection error, we record the lateral position of the response within the workspace. We have studied how this varies when the locations of the left and right endpoints are manipulated independently. Across 30 patients with left neglect, we have observed a characteristic asymmetry between the ‘weightings’ accorded to the two endpoints, such that responses are less affected by changes in the location of the left endpoint than by changes in the location of the right. We show that a simple endpoint weightings analysis accounts readily for the effects of line length and spatial position, including cross-over effects, and leads to an index of neglect that is more sensitive than the standard measure. We argue that this novel approach is more parsimonious than the standard model and yields fresh insights into the nature of neglect impairment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100287,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Brain Research","volume":"25 3","pages":"Pages 833-850"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.008","citationCount":"59","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926641005002697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

Abstract

Horizontal line bisection is a ubiquitous task in the investigation of visual neglect. Patients with left neglect typically make rightward errors that increase with line length and for lines at more leftward positions. For short lines, or for lines presented in right space, these errors may ‘cross over’ to become leftward. We have taken a new approach to these phenomena by employing a different set of dependent and independent variables for their description. Rather than recording bisection error, we record the lateral position of the response within the workspace. We have studied how this varies when the locations of the left and right endpoints are manipulated independently. Across 30 patients with left neglect, we have observed a characteristic asymmetry between the ‘weightings’ accorded to the two endpoints, such that responses are less affected by changes in the location of the left endpoint than by changes in the location of the right. We show that a simple endpoint weightings analysis accounts readily for the effects of line length and spatial position, including cross-over effects, and leads to an index of neglect that is more sensitive than the standard measure. We argue that this novel approach is more parsimonious than the standard model and yields fresh insights into the nature of neglect impairment.

度量衡:对忽视中平分行为的新观察
水平线平分是研究视觉忽视的一项普遍任务。左侧忽视的患者通常会出现向右的错误,随着线的长度和线在更左的位置而增加。对于较短的行,或者在右空格显示的行,这些错误可能会“交叉”到左边。我们对这些现象采取了一种新的方法,即采用一组不同的因变量和自变量来描述它们。我们不记录对角误差,而是记录工作空间内响应的横向位置。我们已经研究了当左右端点的位置被独立操作时,这是如何变化的。在30例左侧忽视患者中,我们观察到两个端点的“权重”之间的特征不对称,因此左端点位置变化对反应的影响小于右端点位置变化。我们表明,一个简单的端点加权分析很容易解释线长和空间位置的影响,包括交叉效应,并导致忽略指数比标准测量更敏感。我们认为,这种新方法比标准模型更简洁,并对忽视损害的本质产生了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信