Regionalized perinatal care in North America

Herman A Hein
{"title":"Regionalized perinatal care in North America","authors":"Herman A Hein","doi":"10.1016/j.siny.2003.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this article is to familiarize the reader with the status of regionalized perinatal health care in North America, and specifically in the United States of America, using the Iowa regionalization model. The evolution of the regionalization movement in the late 1960s and early 1970s is reviewed. It is noted that the movement was largely without federal government intervention. The role of the March of Dimes in developing the first set of so-called national guidelines is chronicled.</p><p>The Iowa model, utilizing some non-tertiary referral centres, is discussed in depth. This model included extensive outreach education for the entire state, and worked well largely because of the lack of competition to the major university teaching hospital located at the University of Iowa in Iowa City. This was not true for many other states and regions because competition did exist between tertiary centres.</p><p>The impact of managed care systems on the overall role of regionalization is discussed. Suggestions are offered for controlling the impact of third-party payers (managed care) on the quality of perinatal health care. An idealized system of monitoring the impact of regionalization and monitoring the effect of managed care is detailed. Finally, the future of regionalization is discussed in the face of deregionalization in populous areas. The need for the best possible care as close to patients' homes as possible (regionalization) still seems apparent.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74783,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in neonatology : SN","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 111-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.siny.2003.08.009","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in neonatology : SN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084275603001325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

The aim of this article is to familiarize the reader with the status of regionalized perinatal health care in North America, and specifically in the United States of America, using the Iowa regionalization model. The evolution of the regionalization movement in the late 1960s and early 1970s is reviewed. It is noted that the movement was largely without federal government intervention. The role of the March of Dimes in developing the first set of so-called national guidelines is chronicled.

The Iowa model, utilizing some non-tertiary referral centres, is discussed in depth. This model included extensive outreach education for the entire state, and worked well largely because of the lack of competition to the major university teaching hospital located at the University of Iowa in Iowa City. This was not true for many other states and regions because competition did exist between tertiary centres.

The impact of managed care systems on the overall role of regionalization is discussed. Suggestions are offered for controlling the impact of third-party payers (managed care) on the quality of perinatal health care. An idealized system of monitoring the impact of regionalization and monitoring the effect of managed care is detailed. Finally, the future of regionalization is discussed in the face of deregionalization in populous areas. The need for the best possible care as close to patients' homes as possible (regionalization) still seems apparent.

北美的区域化围产期护理
本文的目的是让读者熟悉在北美地区,特别是在美国的区域化围产期保健的现状,使用爱荷华州区域化模型。回顾了1960年代末和1970年代初区域化运动的演变。值得注意的是,这场运动基本上没有联邦政府的干预。在制定第一套所谓的国家指导方针的过程中,“一角硬币行动”所起的作用被记录了下来。爱荷华模式,利用一些非三级转诊中心,深入讨论。这一模式包括对整个州进行广泛的外展教育,并在很大程度上运作良好,因为位于爱荷华市爱荷华大学的主要大学教学医院缺乏竞争。但其他许多州和地区的情况并非如此,因为三级中心之间确实存在竞争。管理医疗系统对区域化的整体作用的影响进行了讨论。为控制第三方支付方(管理式护理)对围产期保健质量的影响提出建议。一个理想化的系统监测区域化的影响和监测管理式护理的效果是详细的。最后,在人口密集地区非区域化的背景下,对区域化的未来进行了探讨。在离病人家尽可能近的地方提供尽可能好的护理(区域化)的必要性似乎仍然很明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信