Bacteriological profile and antibiotic resistance: comparison of findings in a burn intensive care unit, other intensive care units, and the hospital services unit of a single center.

Sedat Yildirim, Tark Zafer Nursal, Akin Tarim, Nurkan Torer, Turgut Noyan, Yusuf Ziya Demiroglu, Gokhan Moray, Mehmet Haberal
{"title":"Bacteriological profile and antibiotic resistance: comparison of findings in a burn intensive care unit, other intensive care units, and the hospital services unit of a single center.","authors":"Sedat Yildirim,&nbsp;Tark Zafer Nursal,&nbsp;Akin Tarim,&nbsp;Nurkan Torer,&nbsp;Turgut Noyan,&nbsp;Yusuf Ziya Demiroglu,&nbsp;Gokhan Moray,&nbsp;Mehmet Haberal","doi":"10.1097/01.bcr.0000185454.72237.c6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the study was to define the bacteriological profile and antibiotic resistance patterns of a burn intensive care unit (ICU) and to compare them with the patterns from three other hospital areas in the same center (ie, cardiovascular-coronary ICU, a general ICU, and the hospital service unit). Bacterial isolates were collected prospectively from the burned patients and the patients from the other hospital areas between May 2001 and November 2003. In the burn ICU, Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the isolated pathogen most frequently (40.4%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (29.3%) and Acinetobacter spp. (9.8%). S. aureus was the most common isolated pathogen in other hospital areas. The agents that were most effective against P. aeruginosa in the burn ICU were piperacillin/tazobactam and sulbactam/cefoperazon. We observed higher antimicrobial resistance in burn ICU than in the other hospital areas studied. In conclusion, bacteriological profile and antibiotic resistance patterns of patients in the burn ICU are significantly different from those in other ICUs and hospital units at our center. This knowledge is crucial for early treatment of infections in burned patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22626,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation","volume":"26 6","pages":"488-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/01.bcr.0000185454.72237.c6","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bcr.0000185454.72237.c6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to define the bacteriological profile and antibiotic resistance patterns of a burn intensive care unit (ICU) and to compare them with the patterns from three other hospital areas in the same center (ie, cardiovascular-coronary ICU, a general ICU, and the hospital service unit). Bacterial isolates were collected prospectively from the burned patients and the patients from the other hospital areas between May 2001 and November 2003. In the burn ICU, Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the isolated pathogen most frequently (40.4%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (29.3%) and Acinetobacter spp. (9.8%). S. aureus was the most common isolated pathogen in other hospital areas. The agents that were most effective against P. aeruginosa in the burn ICU were piperacillin/tazobactam and sulbactam/cefoperazon. We observed higher antimicrobial resistance in burn ICU than in the other hospital areas studied. In conclusion, bacteriological profile and antibiotic resistance patterns of patients in the burn ICU are significantly different from those in other ICUs and hospital units at our center. This knowledge is crucial for early treatment of infections in burned patients.

细菌学概况和抗生素耐药性:烧伤重症监护病房、其他重症监护病房和单一中心医院服务部门的比较
本研究的目的是确定烧伤重症监护室(ICU)的细菌学特征和抗生素耐药性模式,并将其与同一中心其他三个医院区域(即心血管-冠状动脉ICU、普通ICU和医院服务单元)的模式进行比较。在2001年5月至2003年11月期间,从烧伤患者和其他医院地区的患者中前瞻性地收集细菌分离株。在烧伤ICU中,分离出的病原菌以铜绿假单胞菌最多(40.4%),其次是金黄色葡萄球菌(29.3%)和不动杆菌(9.8%)。金黄色葡萄球菌是其他医院地区最常见的分离病原菌。烧伤ICU对铜绿假单胞菌最有效的药物是哌拉西林/他唑巴坦和舒巴坦/头孢哌酮。我们观察到烧伤ICU的抗菌药物耐药性高于其他医院。综上所述,烧伤ICU患者的细菌学特征和抗生素耐药模式与我中心其他ICU和医院单位有显著差异。这一知识对于烧伤患者感染的早期治疗至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信