Serological responses in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection and cross-reactivity with human coronaviruses 229E, OC43, and NL63.

K H Chan, V C C Cheng, P C Y Woo, S K P Lau, L L M Poon, Y Guan, W H Seto, K Y Yuen, J S M Peiris
{"title":"Serological responses in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection and cross-reactivity with human coronaviruses 229E, OC43, and NL63.","authors":"K H Chan,&nbsp;V C C Cheng,&nbsp;P C Y Woo,&nbsp;S K P Lau,&nbsp;L L M Poon,&nbsp;Y Guan,&nbsp;W H Seto,&nbsp;K Y Yuen,&nbsp;J S M Peiris","doi":"10.1128/CDLI.12.11.1317-1321.2005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The serological response profile of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus (CoV) infection was defined by neutralization tests and subclass-specific immunofluorescent (IF) tests using serial sera from 20 patients. SARS CoV total immunoglobulin (Ig) (IgG, IgA, and IgM [IgGAM]) was the first antibody to be detectable. There was no difference in time to seroconversion between the patients who survived (n = 14) and those who died (n = 6). Although SARS CoV IgM was still detectable by IF tests with 8 of 11 patients at 7 months postinfection, the geometric mean titers dropped from 282 at 1 month postinfection to 19 at 7 months (P = 0.001). In contrast, neutralizing antibody and SARS CoV IgGAM and IgG antibody titers remained stable over this period. The SARS CoV antibody response was sometimes associated with an increase in preexisting IF IgG antibody titers for human coronaviruses OC43, 229E, and NL63. There was no change in IF IgG titer for virus capsid antigen from the herpesvirus that was used as an unrelated control, Epstein-Barr virus. In contrast, patients who had OC43 infections, and probably also 229E infections, without prior exposure to SARS CoV had increases of antibodies specific for the infecting virus but not for SARS CoV. There is a need for awareness of cross-reactive antibody responses between coronaviruses when interpreting IF serology.</p>","PeriodicalId":72602,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology","volume":"12 11","pages":"1317-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1128/CDLI.12.11.1317-1321.2005","citationCount":"108","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.12.11.1317-1321.2005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 108

Abstract

The serological response profile of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus (CoV) infection was defined by neutralization tests and subclass-specific immunofluorescent (IF) tests using serial sera from 20 patients. SARS CoV total immunoglobulin (Ig) (IgG, IgA, and IgM [IgGAM]) was the first antibody to be detectable. There was no difference in time to seroconversion between the patients who survived (n = 14) and those who died (n = 6). Although SARS CoV IgM was still detectable by IF tests with 8 of 11 patients at 7 months postinfection, the geometric mean titers dropped from 282 at 1 month postinfection to 19 at 7 months (P = 0.001). In contrast, neutralizing antibody and SARS CoV IgGAM and IgG antibody titers remained stable over this period. The SARS CoV antibody response was sometimes associated with an increase in preexisting IF IgG antibody titers for human coronaviruses OC43, 229E, and NL63. There was no change in IF IgG titer for virus capsid antigen from the herpesvirus that was used as an unrelated control, Epstein-Barr virus. In contrast, patients who had OC43 infections, and probably also 229E infections, without prior exposure to SARS CoV had increases of antibodies specific for the infecting virus but not for SARS CoV. There is a need for awareness of cross-reactive antibody responses between coronaviruses when interpreting IF serology.

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒感染患者的血清学反应及与人冠状病毒229E、OC43和NL63的交叉反应
通过中和试验和亚类特异性免疫荧光(IF)试验确定了20例严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)冠状病毒(CoV)感染的血清学反应谱。SARS冠状病毒总免疫球蛋白(IgG、IgA和IgM [IgGAM])是第一个检测到的抗体。存活患者(n = 14)和死亡患者(n = 6)到血清转化的时间没有差异。尽管11例患者中有8例在感染后7个月仍可通过IF试验检测到SARS冠状病毒IgM,但几何平均滴度从感染后1个月的282降至感染后7个月的19 (P = 0.001)。相比之下,中和抗体和SARS冠状病毒IgGAM和IgG抗体滴度在此期间保持稳定。SARS冠状病毒抗体反应有时与先前存在的人类冠状病毒OC43、229E和NL63的IF IgG抗体滴度增加有关。作为不相关对照的疱疹病毒(爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒)的病毒衣壳抗原的IF IgG滴度没有变化。相比之下,没有事先接触过SARS冠状病毒的OC43感染患者,也可能是229E感染患者,其感染病毒特异性抗体增加,而非SARS冠状病毒特异性抗体增加。在解释IF血清学时,需要意识到冠状病毒之间的交叉反应性抗体反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信