Direction and distance deficits in path integration after unilateral vestibular loss depend on task complexity

Patrick Péruch , Liliane Borel , Jacques Magnan , Michel Lacour
{"title":"Direction and distance deficits in path integration after unilateral vestibular loss depend on task complexity","authors":"Patrick Péruch ,&nbsp;Liliane Borel ,&nbsp;Jacques Magnan ,&nbsp;Michel Lacour","doi":"10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The effects of peripheral vestibular disorders on the direction and distance components of the internal spatial representation were investigated. The ability of Menière's patients to perform path integration was assessed in different situations aimed at differentiating the level of spatial processing (simple versus complex tasks), the available sensory cues (proprioceptive, vestibular, or visual conditions), and the side of the path (towards the healthy versus the lesioned side). After exploring two legs of a triangle, participants were required either to reproduce the exploration path, to follow the reverse path, or to take a shortcut to the starting point of the path (triangle completion). Patients' performances were recorded before unilateral vestibular neurotomy (UVN) and during the time-course of recovery (1 week and 1 month) and were compared to those of matched control subjects tested at similar time intervals. Both the angular and linear path components of the trajectory were impaired for patients compared to controls. However, deficits were restricted to the complex tasks, which required a higher level of spatial processing. Most deficits were maximal 1 week after UVN, and some remained up to the first post-operative month. Spatial representation was differentially impaired according to the available sensory cues: deficits were absent in active locomotor blindfolded condition, appeared in conditions involving visual and vestibular information, and were maximal when visual cues alone were available. Finally, concerning the side of the path, unilateral vestibular loss led to global impairment of the internal spatial representation, yet some asymmetrical spatial performances were observed 1 week after UVN. On the whole, results suggest that the environment experienced by the patients is different after UVN and that a different internal spatial representation is constructed, especially for tasks requiring high levels of spatial processing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100287,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Brain Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.012","citationCount":"56","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926641005002879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

Abstract

The effects of peripheral vestibular disorders on the direction and distance components of the internal spatial representation were investigated. The ability of Menière's patients to perform path integration was assessed in different situations aimed at differentiating the level of spatial processing (simple versus complex tasks), the available sensory cues (proprioceptive, vestibular, or visual conditions), and the side of the path (towards the healthy versus the lesioned side). After exploring two legs of a triangle, participants were required either to reproduce the exploration path, to follow the reverse path, or to take a shortcut to the starting point of the path (triangle completion). Patients' performances were recorded before unilateral vestibular neurotomy (UVN) and during the time-course of recovery (1 week and 1 month) and were compared to those of matched control subjects tested at similar time intervals. Both the angular and linear path components of the trajectory were impaired for patients compared to controls. However, deficits were restricted to the complex tasks, which required a higher level of spatial processing. Most deficits were maximal 1 week after UVN, and some remained up to the first post-operative month. Spatial representation was differentially impaired according to the available sensory cues: deficits were absent in active locomotor blindfolded condition, appeared in conditions involving visual and vestibular information, and were maximal when visual cues alone were available. Finally, concerning the side of the path, unilateral vestibular loss led to global impairment of the internal spatial representation, yet some asymmetrical spatial performances were observed 1 week after UVN. On the whole, results suggest that the environment experienced by the patients is different after UVN and that a different internal spatial representation is constructed, especially for tasks requiring high levels of spatial processing.

单侧前庭功能丧失后路径整合的方向和距离缺陷取决于任务复杂性
研究了外周前庭功能障碍对内部空间表征的方向和距离分量的影响。在不同的情况下,menientrere患者执行路径整合的能力被评估,目的是区分空间处理水平(简单任务与复杂任务)、可用的感觉线索(本体感觉、前庭或视觉条件)和路径的一侧(健康侧与受损侧)。在探索了三角形的两条腿之后,参与者被要求重现探索路径,沿着相反的路径,或者走捷径到路径的起点(三角形完成)。记录患者在单侧前庭神经切开术(UVN)前和恢复时间(1周和1个月)期间的表现,并与在相似时间间隔进行测试的匹配对照组进行比较。与对照组相比,患者的轨迹的角度和线性路径组件都受损。然而,缺陷仅限于需要更高水平空间处理的复杂任务。大多数缺损在UVN后1周达到最大,有些缺损一直持续到术后第一个月。空间表征受到不同感觉线索的不同程度的损害:主动运动蒙眼时不存在缺陷,涉及视觉和前庭信息时出现缺陷,而仅提供视觉线索时最大。最后,在通路一侧,单侧前庭功能丧失导致内部空间表征的整体损害,但在UVN后1周观察到一些不对称的空间表现。总的来说,研究结果表明,在UVN后,患者所经历的环境是不同的,并且构建了不同的内部空间表征,特别是对于需要高水平空间处理的任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信