Compliance of a cobalt chromium coronary stent alloy--the COVIS trial.

Jens Hagemeister, Frank M Baer, Robert H G Schwinger, Hans W Höpp
{"title":"Compliance of a cobalt chromium coronary stent alloy--the COVIS trial.","authors":"Jens Hagemeister,&nbsp;Frank M Baer,&nbsp;Robert H G Schwinger,&nbsp;Hans W Höpp","doi":"10.1186/1468-6708-6-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cobalt chromium coronary stents are increasingly being used in percutaneous coronary interventions. There are, however, no reliable data about the characteristics of unfolding and visibility of this stent alloy in vivo. The aim of this study is to compare cobalt chromium coronary stents with conventional stainless steel stents using intracoronary ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty de novo native coronary stenoses < or = 20 mm in length (target vessel reference diameter > or = 2.5 and < or = 4.0 mm) received under sequential intracoronary ultrasound either a cobalt chromium stent (Multi-Link Vision; n = 10) or a stainless steel stent (Multi-Link Zeta; n = 10).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For optimal unfolding, the cobalt chromium stent requires a higher balloon deployment pressure (13.90 +/- 2.03 atm) than the stainless steel stent (11.50 +/- 2.12 atm). Furthermore, the achieved target vessel diameter of the cobalt chromium stent (Visibility-Index QCA/IVUS Multi-Link Vision 1.13 / Multi-Link Zeta 1.04) is more easily overrated by Quantitative Coronary Analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data indicate that stent material-specific recommendations for optimal implantation pressure and different stent material with an equal design should both be considered in interpreting QCA-analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":53230,"journal":{"name":"Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"6 ","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1468-6708-6-17","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1468-6708-6-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Background: Cobalt chromium coronary stents are increasingly being used in percutaneous coronary interventions. There are, however, no reliable data about the characteristics of unfolding and visibility of this stent alloy in vivo. The aim of this study is to compare cobalt chromium coronary stents with conventional stainless steel stents using intracoronary ultrasound.

Methods: Twenty de novo native coronary stenoses < or = 20 mm in length (target vessel reference diameter > or = 2.5 and < or = 4.0 mm) received under sequential intracoronary ultrasound either a cobalt chromium stent (Multi-Link Vision; n = 10) or a stainless steel stent (Multi-Link Zeta; n = 10).

Results: For optimal unfolding, the cobalt chromium stent requires a higher balloon deployment pressure (13.90 +/- 2.03 atm) than the stainless steel stent (11.50 +/- 2.12 atm). Furthermore, the achieved target vessel diameter of the cobalt chromium stent (Visibility-Index QCA/IVUS Multi-Link Vision 1.13 / Multi-Link Zeta 1.04) is more easily overrated by Quantitative Coronary Analysis.

Conclusion: These data indicate that stent material-specific recommendations for optimal implantation pressure and different stent material with an equal design should both be considered in interpreting QCA-analysis.

Abstract Image

钴铬冠状动脉支架合金的依从性——COVIS试验
背景:钴铬冠状动脉支架越来越多地用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。然而,目前还没有关于该支架合金在体内的展开特性和可见性的可靠数据。本研究的目的是通过冠状动脉内超声比较钴铬冠状动脉支架与传统不锈钢支架。方法:20例新生冠状动脉狭窄患者(靶血管参考直径>或= 2.5和<或= 4.0 mm)在序贯冠状动脉内超声下接受钴铬支架(multilink Vision;n = 10)或不锈钢支架(Multi-Link Zeta;N = 10)。结果:为了获得最佳展开效果,钴铬支架所需的球囊展开压力(13.90 +/- 2.03 atm)高于不锈钢支架(11.50 +/- 2.12 atm)。此外,定量冠状动脉分析更容易高估钴铬支架达到的目标血管直径(可视性指数QCA/IVUS Multi-Link Vision 1.13 / Multi-Link Zeta 1.04)。结论:这些数据表明,在解释qca分析时,应考虑特定支架材料推荐的最佳植入压力和不同支架材料的相同设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信