Imagery of motor actions: Differential effects of kinesthetic and visual–motor mode of imagery in single-trial EEG

Christa Neuper , Reinhold Scherer , Miriam Reiner , Gert Pfurtscheller
{"title":"Imagery of motor actions: Differential effects of kinesthetic and visual–motor mode of imagery in single-trial EEG","authors":"Christa Neuper ,&nbsp;Reinhold Scherer ,&nbsp;Miriam Reiner ,&nbsp;Gert Pfurtscheller","doi":"10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Single-trial motor imagery classification is an integral part of a number of brain–computer interface (BCI) systems. The possible significance of the kind of imagery, involving rather kinesthetic or visual representations of actions, was addressed using the following experimental conditions: kinesthetic motor imagery (MIK), visual–motor imagery (MIV), motor execution (ME) and observation of movement (OOM). Based on multi-channel EEG recordings in 14 right-handed participants, we applied a learning classifier, the distinction sensitive learning vector quantization (DSLVQ) to identify relevant features (i.e., frequency bands, electrode sites) for recognition of the respective mental states. For ME and OOM, the overall classification accuracies were about 80%. The rates obtained for MIK (67%) were better than the results of MIV (56%). Moreover, the focus of activity during kinesthetic imagery was found close to the sensorimotor hand area, whereas visual–motor imagery did not reveal a clear spatial pattern. Consequently, to improve motor-imagery-based BCI control, user training should emphasize kinesthetic experiences instead of visual representations of actions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100287,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Brain Research","volume":"25 3","pages":"Pages 668-677"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.014","citationCount":"678","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926641005002533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 678

Abstract

Single-trial motor imagery classification is an integral part of a number of brain–computer interface (BCI) systems. The possible significance of the kind of imagery, involving rather kinesthetic or visual representations of actions, was addressed using the following experimental conditions: kinesthetic motor imagery (MIK), visual–motor imagery (MIV), motor execution (ME) and observation of movement (OOM). Based on multi-channel EEG recordings in 14 right-handed participants, we applied a learning classifier, the distinction sensitive learning vector quantization (DSLVQ) to identify relevant features (i.e., frequency bands, electrode sites) for recognition of the respective mental states. For ME and OOM, the overall classification accuracies were about 80%. The rates obtained for MIK (67%) were better than the results of MIV (56%). Moreover, the focus of activity during kinesthetic imagery was found close to the sensorimotor hand area, whereas visual–motor imagery did not reveal a clear spatial pattern. Consequently, to improve motor-imagery-based BCI control, user training should emphasize kinesthetic experiences instead of visual representations of actions.

运动动作的意象:单次脑电图中动觉和视觉-运动意象模式的不同影响
单次实验运动意象分类是许多脑机接口(BCI)系统的重要组成部分。这种涉及动作的动觉或视觉表征的意象的可能意义,是通过以下实验条件来解决的:动觉运动意象(MIK)、视觉运动意象(MIV)、运动执行(ME)和运动观察(OOM)。基于14名右利手被试的多通道脑电记录,我们采用区分敏感学习向量量化(DSLVQ)学习分类器来识别相关特征(即频带、电极位置)以识别各自的心理状态。对于ME和OOM,总体分类准确率约为80%。MIK的检出率(67%)优于MIV(56%)。此外,在动觉想象过程中,活动的焦点被发现靠近手部感觉运动区域,而视觉运动想象没有显示出清晰的空间模式。因此,为了改善基于运动图像的BCI控制,用户训练应该强调动觉体验,而不是动作的视觉表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信