Stephanie S O'Malley, Daniel J Martin, James D Hosking, Barbara J Mason
{"title":"How pilot studies improve large-scale clinical trials: lessons learned from the COMBINE Study.","authors":"Stephanie S O'Malley, Daniel J Martin, James D Hosking, Barbara J Mason","doi":"10.15288/jsas.2005.s15.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The design of a clinical trial to evaluate a potential therapy requires decisions about issues that include safety, efficacy, measurement, feasibility and training. Experience from the COMBINE Study, which tests the combination of medications and behavioral therapies for alcohol dependence, is presented as an example of how pilot studies improve large-scale clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The COMBINE Pilot 1 inpatient study was designed to inform the main trial about the safety and tolerability of the doses of acamprosate (3 g/day) and naltrexone (100 mg/day) selected for study, alone and in combination. Pilot 2 was conducted as a feasibility study for the main trial, with the goals of (1) assessing the length of and compliance with research assessments, (2) developing methods for subject recruitment and staff training and (3) assessing the safety of the medications under less controlled outpatient conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results from Pilot 1 provided safety information to support testing the medications in an outpatient study and contributed to the decision to incorporate dose reductions into the main trial protocol to manage adverse events. The results of Pilot 2 formed a basis for (1) reducing the length of the assessment battery, (2) having staff fully trained and recruitment procedures established for the main trial and (3) extending the drug safety results of Pilot 1 to outpatient conditions similar to those of the main trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COMBINE Study provides several examples of the successful application of pilot studies to inform the design of a clinical trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":17056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol. Supplement","volume":" 15","pages":"66-71; discussion 65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15288/jsas.2005.s15.66","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsas.2005.s15.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Objective: The design of a clinical trial to evaluate a potential therapy requires decisions about issues that include safety, efficacy, measurement, feasibility and training. Experience from the COMBINE Study, which tests the combination of medications and behavioral therapies for alcohol dependence, is presented as an example of how pilot studies improve large-scale clinical trials.
Method: The COMBINE Pilot 1 inpatient study was designed to inform the main trial about the safety and tolerability of the doses of acamprosate (3 g/day) and naltrexone (100 mg/day) selected for study, alone and in combination. Pilot 2 was conducted as a feasibility study for the main trial, with the goals of (1) assessing the length of and compliance with research assessments, (2) developing methods for subject recruitment and staff training and (3) assessing the safety of the medications under less controlled outpatient conditions.
Results: Results from Pilot 1 provided safety information to support testing the medications in an outpatient study and contributed to the decision to incorporate dose reductions into the main trial protocol to manage adverse events. The results of Pilot 2 formed a basis for (1) reducing the length of the assessment battery, (2) having staff fully trained and recruitment procedures established for the main trial and (3) extending the drug safety results of Pilot 1 to outpatient conditions similar to those of the main trial.
Conclusions: The COMBINE Study provides several examples of the successful application of pilot studies to inform the design of a clinical trial.
目的:临床试验的设计,以评估潜在的治疗需要决定的问题,包括安全性,有效性,测量,可行性和培训。联合研究测试药物和行为疗法对酒精依赖的联合治疗,该研究的经验作为试点研究如何改善大规模临床试验的一个例子。方法:COMBINE Pilot 1住院患者研究旨在告知主要试验选择的阿坎普罗酸(3g /天)和纳曲酮(100mg /天)剂量的安全性和耐受性,单独使用和联合使用。试点二是作为主要试验的可行性研究,其目标是(1)评估研究评估的长度和依从性,(2)制定受试者招募和人员培训的方法,(3)评估在较少控制的门诊条件下药物的安全性。结果:试验1的结果提供了安全性信息,以支持在门诊研究中测试药物,并有助于决定将剂量减少纳入主要试验方案以管理不良事件。试点2的结果构成了以下几个方面的基础:(1)缩短评估周期;(2)为主要试验对工作人员进行充分培训并建立招募程序;(3)将试点1的药物安全结果扩展到与主要试验类似的门诊情况。结论:COMBINE研究提供了几个成功应用试点研究的例子,为临床试验的设计提供信息。