Hydrophilic and lipophilic radiopharmaceuticals as tracers in pharmaceutical development: in vitro--in vivo studies.

Mariella Terán, Eduardo Savio, Andrea Paolino, Malcolm Frier
{"title":"Hydrophilic and lipophilic radiopharmaceuticals as tracers in pharmaceutical development: in vitro--in vivo studies.","authors":"Mariella Terán,&nbsp;Eduardo Savio,&nbsp;Andrea Paolino,&nbsp;Malcolm Frier","doi":"10.1186/1471-2385-5-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Scintigraphic studies have been performed to assess the release, both in vitro and in vivo, of radiotracers from tablet formulations. Four different tracers with differing physicochemical characteristics have been evaluated to assess their suitability as models for drug delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In-vitro disintegration and dissolution studies have been performed at pH 1, 4 and 7. In-vivo studies have been performed by scintigraphic imaging in healthy volunteers. Two hydrophilic tracers, (99mTc-DTPA) and (99mTc-MDP), and two lipophilic tracers, (99mTc-ECD) and (99mTc-MIBI), were used as drug models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dissolution and disintegration profiles, differed depending on the drug model chosen. In vitro dissolution velocity constants indicated a probable retention of the radiotracer in the formulation. In vivo disintegration velocity constants showed important variability for each radiopharmaceutical. Pearson statistical test showed no correlation between in vitro drug release, and in vivo behaviour, for 99mTc-DTPA, 99mTc-ECD and 99mTc-MIBI. High correlation coefficients were found for 99mTc-MDP not only for in vitro dissolution and disintegration studies but also for in vivo scintigraphic studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Scintigraphic studies have made a significant contribution to the development of drug delivery systems. It is essential, however, to choose the appropriate radiotracers as models of drug behaviour. This study has demonstrated significant differences in release patterns, depending on the model chosen. It is likely that each formulation would require the development of a specific model, rather than being able to use a generic drug model on the basis of its physicochemical characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":80684,"journal":{"name":"BMC nuclear medicine","volume":"5 ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1471-2385-5-5","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC nuclear medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2385-5-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Scintigraphic studies have been performed to assess the release, both in vitro and in vivo, of radiotracers from tablet formulations. Four different tracers with differing physicochemical characteristics have been evaluated to assess their suitability as models for drug delivery.

Methods: In-vitro disintegration and dissolution studies have been performed at pH 1, 4 and 7. In-vivo studies have been performed by scintigraphic imaging in healthy volunteers. Two hydrophilic tracers, (99mTc-DTPA) and (99mTc-MDP), and two lipophilic tracers, (99mTc-ECD) and (99mTc-MIBI), were used as drug models.

Results: Dissolution and disintegration profiles, differed depending on the drug model chosen. In vitro dissolution velocity constants indicated a probable retention of the radiotracer in the formulation. In vivo disintegration velocity constants showed important variability for each radiopharmaceutical. Pearson statistical test showed no correlation between in vitro drug release, and in vivo behaviour, for 99mTc-DTPA, 99mTc-ECD and 99mTc-MIBI. High correlation coefficients were found for 99mTc-MDP not only for in vitro dissolution and disintegration studies but also for in vivo scintigraphic studies.

Conclusion: Scintigraphic studies have made a significant contribution to the development of drug delivery systems. It is essential, however, to choose the appropriate radiotracers as models of drug behaviour. This study has demonstrated significant differences in release patterns, depending on the model chosen. It is likely that each formulation would require the development of a specific model, rather than being able to use a generic drug model on the basis of its physicochemical characteristics.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

亲水性和亲脂性放射性药物作为药物开发中的示踪剂:体外-体内研究。
背景:已经进行了闪烁扫描研究,以评估片剂制剂中放射性示踪剂的体外和体内释放。已经对具有不同物理化学特性的四种不同示踪剂进行了评估,以评估它们作为药物递送模型的适用性。方法:在pH1、4和7条件下进行体外崩解和溶出度研究。已经在健康志愿者中通过闪烁扫描成像进行了体内研究。两种亲水性示踪剂,(99mTc-DTPA)和(99mTc-MDP),以及两种亲脂性示踪剂(99mTc-ECD)和(99%Tc-MIBI)被用作药物模型。结果:溶出度和崩解度随所选药物型号的不同而不同。体外溶出速度常数表明放射性示踪剂可能保留在制剂中。体内崩解速度常数显示出每种放射性药物的重要可变性。Pearson统计检验显示,99mTc-DTPA、99mTc-ECD和99mTc-MIBI的体外药物释放和体内行为之间没有相关性。99mTc-MDP不仅在体外溶出和崩解研究中,而且在体内闪烁扫描研究中都有很高的相关系数。结论:闪烁扫描研究对药物递送系统的发展做出了重大贡献。然而,选择合适的放射性示踪剂作为药物行为的模型是至关重要的。这项研究表明,根据所选择的模型,释放模式存在显著差异。每种制剂都可能需要开发一个特定的模型,而不是能够根据其物理化学特性使用仿制药模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信