Developing a baseline assessment battery: balancing patient time burden with essential clinical and research monitoring.

David R Gastfriend, Dennis Donovan, Rachel Lefebvre, Kelly T Murray
{"title":"Developing a baseline assessment battery: balancing patient time burden with essential clinical and research monitoring.","authors":"David R Gastfriend,&nbsp;Dennis Donovan,&nbsp;Rachel Lefebvre,&nbsp;Kelly T Murray","doi":"10.15288/jsas.2005.s15.94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Baseline assessment in a multisite alcohol-dependence treatment study has several purposes: addressing inclusion/exclusion criteria and characterizing participants to illuminate subsequent efficacy and safety patterns of the interventions. Combination pharmacotherapy and behavioral therapy trials, however, require more complex assessments than single-modality studies. Medication trials require measures of initial safety for study drug as well as for subsequent side-effect and adverse-effect monitoring (e.g., physical examination, laboratory markers, somatic symptoms, medical conditions and concomitant medications). Behavioral therapy trials (and in some cases medication trials) warrant baseline measurement of mediators of therapy effect (e.g., prior treatment history, motivation for change, self-efficacy, other psychiatric conditions, treatment expectations and network supports). Measures may be needed to interpret interactions that may be discovered between these modalities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism COMBINE Study evaluated the potentially overwhelming number of candidate instruments through an iterative process, using the following sequence to finalize a rational baseline assessment battery: key constructs, representative measures, determination of duration of assessment, risk of assessment reactivity, goal priorities, necessity for measure \"pruning\" and order of measure presentation. After selecting the draft battery, feasibility was evaluated in a pilot study prior to the main trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The battery was feasible to administer and avoided unintended selection bias. Dropout was substantial, however, and differences across sites in baseline assessment completion rates reflected a tendency of a central intake model to function as an initial filter of dropouts, compared with a direct recruitment model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This process holds several potentially useful lessons for investigators.</p>","PeriodicalId":17056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol. Supplement","volume":" 15","pages":"94-103; discussion 92-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15288/jsas.2005.s15.94","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsas.2005.s15.94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Objective: Baseline assessment in a multisite alcohol-dependence treatment study has several purposes: addressing inclusion/exclusion criteria and characterizing participants to illuminate subsequent efficacy and safety patterns of the interventions. Combination pharmacotherapy and behavioral therapy trials, however, require more complex assessments than single-modality studies. Medication trials require measures of initial safety for study drug as well as for subsequent side-effect and adverse-effect monitoring (e.g., physical examination, laboratory markers, somatic symptoms, medical conditions and concomitant medications). Behavioral therapy trials (and in some cases medication trials) warrant baseline measurement of mediators of therapy effect (e.g., prior treatment history, motivation for change, self-efficacy, other psychiatric conditions, treatment expectations and network supports). Measures may be needed to interpret interactions that may be discovered between these modalities.

Method: The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism COMBINE Study evaluated the potentially overwhelming number of candidate instruments through an iterative process, using the following sequence to finalize a rational baseline assessment battery: key constructs, representative measures, determination of duration of assessment, risk of assessment reactivity, goal priorities, necessity for measure "pruning" and order of measure presentation. After selecting the draft battery, feasibility was evaluated in a pilot study prior to the main trial.

Results: The battery was feasible to administer and avoided unintended selection bias. Dropout was substantial, however, and differences across sites in baseline assessment completion rates reflected a tendency of a central intake model to function as an initial filter of dropouts, compared with a direct recruitment model.

Conclusions: This process holds several potentially useful lessons for investigators.

开发基线评估系统:平衡患者时间负担与必要的临床和研究监测。
目的:多地点酒精依赖治疗研究的基线评估有几个目的:确定纳入/排除标准,描述参与者的特征,以阐明干预措施的后续有效性和安全性模式。然而,联合药物治疗和行为治疗试验需要比单模式研究更复杂的评估。药物试验需要对研究药物的初始安全性以及随后的副作用和不良反应监测(例如,体格检查、实验室标记物、躯体症状、医疗状况和伴随用药)采取措施。行为治疗试验(在某些情况下是药物试验)需要对治疗效果的中介进行基线测量(例如,先前的治疗史、改变的动机、自我效能、其他精神状况、治疗期望和网络支持)。可能需要采取措施来解释这些模式之间可能发现的相互作用。方法:国家酒精滥用和酒精中毒研究所联合研究通过一个迭代过程评估了潜在压倒性数量的候选工具,使用以下顺序最终确定一个合理的基线评估组:关键结构、代表性措施、评估持续时间的确定、评估反应性的风险、目标优先级、测量“修剪”的必要性和测量呈现的顺序。在选择了草稿电池之后,在主要试验之前,在试点研究中评估了可行性。结果:电池管理可行,避免了意外的选择偏差。然而,辍学率很高,不同地点基线评估完成率的差异反映了与直接招募模型相比,中心招募模型更倾向于作为辍学率的初始过滤器。结论:这一过程为研究人员提供了几个潜在的有用经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信