Origins, issues and options in the development of the combined behavioral intervention.

Richard Longabaugh, Allen Zweben, Joseph S Locastro, William R Miller
{"title":"Origins, issues and options in the development of the combined behavioral intervention.","authors":"Richard Longabaugh,&nbsp;Allen Zweben,&nbsp;Joseph S Locastro,&nbsp;William R Miller","doi":"10.15288/jsas.2005.s15.179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the investigators was to develop a moderate intensity comprehensive behavioral treatment based on the principles of motivational interviewing and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy that, within the confines of a standardized abstinence-oriented treatment, would provide a broad spectrum of modules to assist those seeking treatment to achieve reduction of problematic drinking.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The core issue of how to deliver a flexible therapy tailored to the needs of individual clients while at the same time providing a standardized treatment protocol for a randomized clinical trial provided the dilemma out of which this unique standardized protocol arose. By using a single decision tree, client choice, combined with limited options, we were able to reconcile these conflicting demands.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key decisions that were made in developing the treatment protocol and the thinking leading to these decisions are described.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding these key issues and the factors that led to the decisions made will assist would-be users in their own clinical and/or clinical research needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol. Supplement","volume":" 15","pages":"179-87; discussion 168-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15288/jsas.2005.s15.179","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsas.2005.s15.179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the investigators was to develop a moderate intensity comprehensive behavioral treatment based on the principles of motivational interviewing and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy that, within the confines of a standardized abstinence-oriented treatment, would provide a broad spectrum of modules to assist those seeking treatment to achieve reduction of problematic drinking.

Method: The core issue of how to deliver a flexible therapy tailored to the needs of individual clients while at the same time providing a standardized treatment protocol for a randomized clinical trial provided the dilemma out of which this unique standardized protocol arose. By using a single decision tree, client choice, combined with limited options, we were able to reconcile these conflicting demands.

Results: Key decisions that were made in developing the treatment protocol and the thinking leading to these decisions are described.

Conclusions: Understanding these key issues and the factors that led to the decisions made will assist would-be users in their own clinical and/or clinical research needs.

联合行为干预发展的起源、问题和选择。
目的:研究人员的目的是基于动机访谈和认知行为疗法的原则开发一种中等强度的综合行为治疗,在标准化的以戒酒为导向的治疗范围内,提供广泛的模块来帮助那些寻求治疗的人减少饮酒问题。方法:核心问题是如何提供一个灵活的治疗量身定制的个人客户的需求,同时为随机临床试验提供一个标准化的治疗方案提供了这个独特的标准化方案产生的困境。通过使用单一的决策树,客户选择,结合有限的选项,我们能够协调这些相互冲突的需求。结果:在制定治疗方案和思维导致这些决定的关键决策进行了描述。结论:了解这些关键问题和导致做出决定的因素将有助于潜在用户满足他们自己的临床和/或临床研究需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信