Richard Longabaugh, Allen Zweben, Joseph S Locastro, William R Miller
{"title":"Origins, issues and options in the development of the combined behavioral intervention.","authors":"Richard Longabaugh, Allen Zweben, Joseph S Locastro, William R Miller","doi":"10.15288/jsas.2005.s15.179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the investigators was to develop a moderate intensity comprehensive behavioral treatment based on the principles of motivational interviewing and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy that, within the confines of a standardized abstinence-oriented treatment, would provide a broad spectrum of modules to assist those seeking treatment to achieve reduction of problematic drinking.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The core issue of how to deliver a flexible therapy tailored to the needs of individual clients while at the same time providing a standardized treatment protocol for a randomized clinical trial provided the dilemma out of which this unique standardized protocol arose. By using a single decision tree, client choice, combined with limited options, we were able to reconcile these conflicting demands.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key decisions that were made in developing the treatment protocol and the thinking leading to these decisions are described.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding these key issues and the factors that led to the decisions made will assist would-be users in their own clinical and/or clinical research needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol. Supplement","volume":" 15","pages":"179-87; discussion 168-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15288/jsas.2005.s15.179","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsas.2005.s15.179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the investigators was to develop a moderate intensity comprehensive behavioral treatment based on the principles of motivational interviewing and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy that, within the confines of a standardized abstinence-oriented treatment, would provide a broad spectrum of modules to assist those seeking treatment to achieve reduction of problematic drinking.
Method: The core issue of how to deliver a flexible therapy tailored to the needs of individual clients while at the same time providing a standardized treatment protocol for a randomized clinical trial provided the dilemma out of which this unique standardized protocol arose. By using a single decision tree, client choice, combined with limited options, we were able to reconcile these conflicting demands.
Results: Key decisions that were made in developing the treatment protocol and the thinking leading to these decisions are described.
Conclusions: Understanding these key issues and the factors that led to the decisions made will assist would-be users in their own clinical and/or clinical research needs.