Rapid, accurate and precise quantitative drug analysis: comparing liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and chip-based nanoelectrospray ionisation mass spectrometry.

IF 0.8
Louisa N Alfazema, Don S Richards, Sylvie Gélébart, John C Mitchell, Martin J Snowden
{"title":"Rapid, accurate and precise quantitative drug analysis: comparing liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and chip-based nanoelectrospray ionisation mass spectrometry.","authors":"Louisa N Alfazema,&nbsp;Don S Richards,&nbsp;Sylvie Gélébart,&nbsp;John C Mitchell,&nbsp;Martin J Snowden","doi":"10.1255/ejms.772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have developed a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) system capable of achieving better than 2% accuracy, routinely over a wide concentration range of 1800 ng mL-1. We demonstrate that the necessary high precision, high accuracy and rapid analysis can be achieved using LC-MS/MS technology. Automated nanoelectrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry (nanoESI-MS/MS) technology can be employed to eliminate the chromatographic step completely. In this paper, nanoESI-MS/MS is evaluated and compared directly with LC-MS/MS for the quantitative analysis of two-test analytes, amitriptyline (ATT) and 5-methoxytryptamine (5-MTT), in aqueous/organic mixture. Calibration curves were found to be linear over a wide concentration range of 1800 ng mL-1 for both analytes using LC-MS/MS. Using nanoESI-MS/MS ATT gave a linear response while 5-MTT gave a non-linear response using nanoESI-MS/MS over the same concentration range as in LC-MS/MS. Accuracy and precision values of quality control samples (QCs) at four concentration levels were analysed in replicates of six at each level using 5-MTT and ATT as test analytes for both techniques. The LC-MS/MS system was capable of achieving accuracy levels of 99.50101.96% for ATT and 100.17100.40% for 5-MTT. Accuracy levels using nanoESI-MS/MS were not comparable to LC-MS/MS, they ranged from 90.09100.18% for ATT and 95.95113.55% for 5-MTT. The precision values obtained for nanoESI-MS/MS were in good agreement with those obtained by LC-MS/MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":520618,"journal":{"name":"European journal of mass spectrometry (Chichester, England)","volume":" ","pages":"393-402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1255/ejms.772","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of mass spectrometry (Chichester, England)","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1255/ejms.772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

We have developed a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) system capable of achieving better than 2% accuracy, routinely over a wide concentration range of 1800 ng mL-1. We demonstrate that the necessary high precision, high accuracy and rapid analysis can be achieved using LC-MS/MS technology. Automated nanoelectrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry (nanoESI-MS/MS) technology can be employed to eliminate the chromatographic step completely. In this paper, nanoESI-MS/MS is evaluated and compared directly with LC-MS/MS for the quantitative analysis of two-test analytes, amitriptyline (ATT) and 5-methoxytryptamine (5-MTT), in aqueous/organic mixture. Calibration curves were found to be linear over a wide concentration range of 1800 ng mL-1 for both analytes using LC-MS/MS. Using nanoESI-MS/MS ATT gave a linear response while 5-MTT gave a non-linear response using nanoESI-MS/MS over the same concentration range as in LC-MS/MS. Accuracy and precision values of quality control samples (QCs) at four concentration levels were analysed in replicates of six at each level using 5-MTT and ATT as test analytes for both techniques. The LC-MS/MS system was capable of achieving accuracy levels of 99.50101.96% for ATT and 100.17100.40% for 5-MTT. Accuracy levels using nanoESI-MS/MS were not comparable to LC-MS/MS, they ranged from 90.09100.18% for ATT and 95.95113.55% for 5-MTT. The precision values obtained for nanoESI-MS/MS were in good agreement with those obtained by LC-MS/MS.

快速,准确和精确的定量药物分析:比较液相色谱串联质谱和基于芯片的纳米电喷雾电离质谱。
我们开发了一种液相色谱串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)系统,能够在1800 ng mL-1的宽浓度范围内实现优于2%的准确度。结果表明,采用LC-MS/MS技术可以实现所需的高精度、高精度和快速分析。自动化纳米电喷雾电离串联质谱(nanoESI-MS/MS)技术可以完全消除色谱步骤。本文评价并比较了纳米esi -MS/MS与LC-MS/MS在水/有机混合物中对阿米替林(ATT)和5-甲氧基色胺(5-MTT)的定量分析。使用LC-MS/MS对两种分析物在1800 ng mL-1的宽浓度范围内发现校准曲线呈线性。在与LC-MS/MS相同的浓度范围内,使用nanoESI-MS/MS, ATT具有线性响应,而5-MTT具有非线性响应。使用5-MTT和ATT作为两种技术的测试分析物,在4个浓度水平上重复分析6个质量控制样品(qc)的准确度和精密度值。LC-MS/MS系统对ATT和5-MTT的准确度分别达到99.50101.96%和100.17100.40%。使用nanoESI-MS/MS的准确度水平与LC-MS/MS不具有可比性,其范围为ATT的90.09100.18%和5-MTT的95.95113.55%。纳米esi -MS/MS的精密度值与LC-MS/MS的精密度值基本一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信