Do corticosteroids prevent oesophageal stricture after corrosive ingestion?

Daniela Pelclová, Tomás Navrátil
{"title":"Do corticosteroids prevent oesophageal stricture after corrosive ingestion?","authors":"Daniela Pelclová,&nbsp;Tomás Navrátil","doi":"10.2165/00139709-200524020-00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The most serious complication of corrosive damage to the oesophagus besides perforation is stricture formation. The role of corticosteroids in preventing corrosive-induced strictures is controversial. This review evaluates the usefulness of corticosteroid treatment by critically assessing clinical reports published between 1991 and 2004 in the English, German, French and Spanish literature. Inclusion criteria were the presence of second- or third-degree oesophageal injuries documented by endoscopy and management involving either at least an 8-day course of corticosteroids or no steroid therapy. Ten studies with a total of 572 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria: six studies employed corticosteroids, two studies did not use corticosteroids, and two studies compared the outcome with and without corticosteroid treatment. In those patients with second-degree burns, the incidence of stricture in the corticosteroid-treated patients was 13.8% and in the non-corticosteroid-treated patients was 6.3%. In those patients with third-degree burns, significantly worse results were found in the corticosteroid-treated group (71.0%) than in the non-corticosteroid-treated group (23.1%). As all studies did not separate second- and third-degree burns, re-analysis of the outcome was undertaken. In the 305 patients treated with corticosteroids, 35.1% developed strictures, whereas 33.3% of the 267 non-corticosteroid-treated patients developed strictures. These data suggest that systemic corticosteroids are not beneficial for second- and third-degree corrosive oesophageal burns. Therefore, the use of corticosteroids in the management of corrosive ingestions should be abandoned as they do not prevent the development of strictures and may lead to the development of serious adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":87031,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological reviews","volume":"24 2","pages":"125-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00139709-200524020-00006","citationCount":"136","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00139709-200524020-00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 136

Abstract

The most serious complication of corrosive damage to the oesophagus besides perforation is stricture formation. The role of corticosteroids in preventing corrosive-induced strictures is controversial. This review evaluates the usefulness of corticosteroid treatment by critically assessing clinical reports published between 1991 and 2004 in the English, German, French and Spanish literature. Inclusion criteria were the presence of second- or third-degree oesophageal injuries documented by endoscopy and management involving either at least an 8-day course of corticosteroids or no steroid therapy. Ten studies with a total of 572 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria: six studies employed corticosteroids, two studies did not use corticosteroids, and two studies compared the outcome with and without corticosteroid treatment. In those patients with second-degree burns, the incidence of stricture in the corticosteroid-treated patients was 13.8% and in the non-corticosteroid-treated patients was 6.3%. In those patients with third-degree burns, significantly worse results were found in the corticosteroid-treated group (71.0%) than in the non-corticosteroid-treated group (23.1%). As all studies did not separate second- and third-degree burns, re-analysis of the outcome was undertaken. In the 305 patients treated with corticosteroids, 35.1% developed strictures, whereas 33.3% of the 267 non-corticosteroid-treated patients developed strictures. These data suggest that systemic corticosteroids are not beneficial for second- and third-degree corrosive oesophageal burns. Therefore, the use of corticosteroids in the management of corrosive ingestions should be abandoned as they do not prevent the development of strictures and may lead to the development of serious adverse effects.

糖皮质激素能预防腐蚀性食入后的食道狭窄吗?
食管腐蚀损伤除穿孔外最严重的并发症是食管狭窄的形成。皮质类固醇在预防腐蚀性狭窄中的作用是有争议的。本综述通过对1991年至2004年间发表在英语、德语、法语和西班牙语文献中的临床报告进行批判性评估,以评估皮质类固醇治疗的有效性。纳入标准为内窥镜检查记录的二度或三度食管损伤,治疗包括至少8天的皮质类固醇治疗或不使用类固醇治疗。10项研究共572例患者符合纳入标准:6项研究使用皮质类固醇,2项研究不使用皮质类固醇,2项研究比较使用和不使用皮质类固醇治疗的结果。在二度烧伤患者中,皮质激素治疗组的狭窄发生率为13.8%,非皮质激素治疗组的狭窄发生率为6.3%。在三度烧伤患者中,皮质激素治疗组(71.0%)明显低于非皮质激素治疗组(23.1%)。由于所有的研究都没有区分二度和三度烧伤,因此对结果进行了重新分析。在305名接受皮质类固醇治疗的患者中,35.1%发生狭窄,而267名未接受皮质类固醇治疗的患者中,33.3%发生狭窄。这些数据表明,全身皮质类固醇对二度和三度腐蚀性食管烧伤无效。因此,应放弃使用皮质类固醇治疗腐蚀性摄入,因为它们不能防止狭窄的发展,并可能导致严重的不良反应的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信