Virtual Care in Rhinology.

IF 2.2
Kristine A Smith, Andrew Thamboo, Yvonne Chan, Christopher J Chin, Megan Werger, Brian Rotenberg
{"title":"Virtual Care in Rhinology.","authors":"Kristine A Smith,&nbsp;Andrew Thamboo,&nbsp;Yvonne Chan,&nbsp;Christopher J Chin,&nbsp;Megan Werger,&nbsp;Brian Rotenberg","doi":"10.1186/s40463-021-00505-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID) pandemic has resulted in an increase in virtual care. While some specialties are well suited to virtual care, Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery could be limited due to reliance on physical examination and nasal endoscopy, including Rhinology. It is likely virtual care will remain integrated for the foreseeable future and it is important to determine the strengths and weaknesses of this treatment modality for rhinology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey on virtual care in rhinology was distributed to 61 Canadian rhinologists. The primary objective was to determine how virtual care compared to in-person care in each area of a typical appointment. Other areas focused on platforms used to deliver virtual care and which patients could be appropriately assessed by virtual visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>43 participants responded (response rate 70.5%). The majority of participants use the telephone as their primary platform. History taking and reviewing results (lab work, imaging) were reported to be equivalent in virtual care. Non-urgent follow up and new patients were thought to be the most appropriate for virtual care. The inability to perform exams and nasal endoscopy were reported to be significant limitations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is important to understand the strengths and limitations of virtual care. These results identify the perceived strengths and weaknesses of virtual care in rhinology, and will help rhinologists understand the role of virtual care in their practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":520683,"journal":{"name":"Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale","volume":" ","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40463-021-00505-1","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-021-00505-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID) pandemic has resulted in an increase in virtual care. While some specialties are well suited to virtual care, Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery could be limited due to reliance on physical examination and nasal endoscopy, including Rhinology. It is likely virtual care will remain integrated for the foreseeable future and it is important to determine the strengths and weaknesses of this treatment modality for rhinology.

Methods: A survey on virtual care in rhinology was distributed to 61 Canadian rhinologists. The primary objective was to determine how virtual care compared to in-person care in each area of a typical appointment. Other areas focused on platforms used to deliver virtual care and which patients could be appropriately assessed by virtual visits.

Results: 43 participants responded (response rate 70.5%). The majority of participants use the telephone as their primary platform. History taking and reviewing results (lab work, imaging) were reported to be equivalent in virtual care. Non-urgent follow up and new patients were thought to be the most appropriate for virtual care. The inability to perform exams and nasal endoscopy were reported to be significant limitations.

Conclusion: It is important to understand the strengths and limitations of virtual care. These results identify the perceived strengths and weaknesses of virtual care in rhinology, and will help rhinologists understand the role of virtual care in their practices.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

鼻内科的虚拟护理。
背景:SARS-CoV-2 (COVID)大流行导致虚拟护理增加。虽然有些专科非常适合虚拟护理,但耳鼻喉头颈外科由于依赖身体检查和鼻内窥镜(包括鼻内科)而受到限制。在可预见的未来,虚拟护理很可能仍将保持一体化,确定这种鼻科治疗方式的优缺点非常重要。方法:对61名加拿大鼻内科医生进行鼻内科虚拟护理调查。主要目的是确定在典型预约的每个领域,虚拟护理与面对面护理相比如何。其他领域的重点是用于提供虚拟护理的平台,以及哪些患者可以通过虚拟访问进行适当评估。结果:有应答者43人,应答率70.5%。大多数参与者使用电话作为他们的主要平台。据报道,在虚拟护理中,病史记录和复查结果(实验室工作、影像学)是相同的。非紧急随访和新患者被认为是最适合虚拟护理的。据报道,无法进行检查和鼻内窥镜检查是显著的限制。结论:了解虚拟医疗的优势和局限性是非常重要的。这些结果确定了鼻科虚拟护理的优势和劣势,并将帮助鼻科医生了解虚拟护理在其实践中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信