"Imagine the Perfect Vaccine": Homeopathic Vaccine Alternatives and Vaccine Discourse in English Canada.

IF 0.4 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Canadian Bulletin of Medical History Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-05 DOI:10.3138/cbmh.445-052020
Derek Cameron
{"title":"\"Imagine the Perfect Vaccine\": Homeopathic Vaccine Alternatives and Vaccine Discourse in English Canada.","authors":"Derek Cameron","doi":"10.3138/cbmh.445-052020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advocates of homeopathic vaccines, also known as nosodes, reimagined the risks and benefits of vaccination from 1999 to 2015 by comparing \"risky\" vaccines to \"risk-free\" nosodes. I argue that nosodes allowed for a complementary argument to anti-vaccine discourse, fundamentally altering what had been framed as a choice between the risks of vaccination and the risks of vaccine-preventable disease. Despite evidence of their efficacy being flawed, advocates presented nosodes as an alternative to vaccines and a middle ground between anti-vaccination and vaccination. While a campaign from 2013 to 2015 tried to expose nosodes as ineffective, I argue that the campaign was unsuccessful. Instead, the mainstream media brought more attention to nosodes. The history of nosodes further complicates the history of vaccines and alternative medicine in Canada by adding vaccine alternatives to the growing literature on vaccine hesitancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":55634,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Bulletin of Medical History","volume":"38 1","pages":"32-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Bulletin of Medical History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cbmh.445-052020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Advocates of homeopathic vaccines, also known as nosodes, reimagined the risks and benefits of vaccination from 1999 to 2015 by comparing "risky" vaccines to "risk-free" nosodes. I argue that nosodes allowed for a complementary argument to anti-vaccine discourse, fundamentally altering what had been framed as a choice between the risks of vaccination and the risks of vaccine-preventable disease. Despite evidence of their efficacy being flawed, advocates presented nosodes as an alternative to vaccines and a middle ground between anti-vaccination and vaccination. While a campaign from 2013 to 2015 tried to expose nosodes as ineffective, I argue that the campaign was unsuccessful. Instead, the mainstream media brought more attention to nosodes. The history of nosodes further complicates the history of vaccines and alternative medicine in Canada by adding vaccine alternatives to the growing literature on vaccine hesitancy.

“想象完美的疫苗”:顺势疗法疫苗替代品和加拿大英语中的疫苗话语。
从1999年到2015年,顺势疗法疫苗(也被称为病状疫苗)的倡导者通过将“有风险的”疫苗与“无风险的”病状疫苗进行比较,重新想象了疫苗接种的风险和益处。我认为,nosodes为反疫苗话语提供了一个补充论点,从根本上改变了疫苗接种风险与疫苗可预防疾病风险之间的选择框架。尽管其有效性的证据存在缺陷,但倡导者将nosodes作为疫苗的替代品,以及介于反疫苗接种和疫苗接种之间的中间地带。虽然从2013年到2015年的一场运动试图揭露疾病是无效的,但我认为这场运动是失败的。相反,主流媒体把更多的注意力放在了疾病上。在不断增长的关于疫苗犹豫的文献中,nosodes的历史增加了疫苗替代品,使加拿大疫苗和替代医学的历史进一步复杂化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Bulletin of Medical History
Canadian Bulletin of Medical History HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Canadian Bulletin of Medical History / Bulletin canadien d"histoire de la médecine is the official organ of the Canadian Society for the History of Medicine/ Société canadienne d"histoire de la médecine and is the primary outlet in Canada for refereed scholarship in the history of medicine. This journal, published twice yearly, presents articles, notes, review articles, and book reviews in French and in English. No aspect of the general field is excluded as a matter of policy, though the particular focus is on scholarship in Canadian medical history.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信