A Systematic Review of Self-Compassion in Chronic Pain: From Correlation to Efficacy.

IF 2.9 4区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY
Camile Lanzaro, Sérgio A Carvalho, Teresa A Lapa, Ana Valentim, Bruno Gago
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Self-Compassion in Chronic Pain: From Correlation to Efficacy.","authors":"Camile Lanzaro,&nbsp;Sérgio A Carvalho,&nbsp;Teresa A Lapa,&nbsp;Ana Valentim,&nbsp;Bruno Gago","doi":"10.1017/SJP.2021.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic pain (CP) is a common condition affecting millions of people worldwide. Compassion-related interventions are proving to be advantageous in CP, and self-compassion (SC) is hypothesized to be related with pain regulation physiological processes, as well as with psychological benefits in CP. We aimed to review scientific literature on: 1) Compassion-based psychological interventions and their changes in pain outcomes; and 2) associations between SC and pain-related outcomes. We performed a systematic research in four electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library from inception until April 2020. In Question 1, we included studies involving adult patients with CP who participated in compassion-based psychological interventions. In Question 2, we included studies that examined the associations between SC and pain outcomes in adults with CP. We identified 16 studies. For Question 1, we included seven studies focused on different compassion-based interventions that assessed at least one pain outcome, in a total of 253 participants with CP associated with multiple conditions. For Question 2, we included nine studies, in a total of 1,430 participants, with eight different pain outcomes: Intensity, acceptance, catastrophizing, self-efficacy, disability, distress, pain related coping and anxiety. Considering the high heterogeneity between studies and the poor-quality assessment, we could not draw definitive conclusions on the efficacy of compassion-based interventions nor on the association between SC and pain outcomes. Studies are further discussed in detail. This review can be a starting point for large-scale and high-quality trials in this area as it provides an organized overview of the current literature on this topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":54309,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Psychology","volume":"24 ","pages":"e26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/SJP.2021.22","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2021.22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Chronic pain (CP) is a common condition affecting millions of people worldwide. Compassion-related interventions are proving to be advantageous in CP, and self-compassion (SC) is hypothesized to be related with pain regulation physiological processes, as well as with psychological benefits in CP. We aimed to review scientific literature on: 1) Compassion-based psychological interventions and their changes in pain outcomes; and 2) associations between SC and pain-related outcomes. We performed a systematic research in four electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library from inception until April 2020. In Question 1, we included studies involving adult patients with CP who participated in compassion-based psychological interventions. In Question 2, we included studies that examined the associations between SC and pain outcomes in adults with CP. We identified 16 studies. For Question 1, we included seven studies focused on different compassion-based interventions that assessed at least one pain outcome, in a total of 253 participants with CP associated with multiple conditions. For Question 2, we included nine studies, in a total of 1,430 participants, with eight different pain outcomes: Intensity, acceptance, catastrophizing, self-efficacy, disability, distress, pain related coping and anxiety. Considering the high heterogeneity between studies and the poor-quality assessment, we could not draw definitive conclusions on the efficacy of compassion-based interventions nor on the association between SC and pain outcomes. Studies are further discussed in detail. This review can be a starting point for large-scale and high-quality trials in this area as it provides an organized overview of the current literature on this topic.

自我同情在慢性疼痛中的系统评价:从相关性到疗效。
慢性疼痛(CP)是一种影响全世界数百万人的常见疾病。同情相关的干预措施在CP中被证明是有利的,自我同情(SC)被假设与CP的疼痛调节生理过程有关,以及与心理益处有关。我们旨在回顾科学文献:1)基于同情的心理干预及其对疼痛结果的改变;2) SC与疼痛相关结果之间的关系。我们对四个电子数据库:MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO和Cochrane Library进行了系统的研究,从成立到2020年4月。在问题1中,我们纳入了参与基于同情的心理干预的成年CP患者的研究。在问题2中,我们纳入了检查成人CP患者SC与疼痛结果之间关系的研究。我们确定了16项研究。对于问题1,我们纳入了7项研究,这些研究集中在不同的基于同情的干预措施上,评估了至少一种疼痛结果,共有253名CP患者伴有多种情况。对于问题2,我们纳入了9项研究,总共1430名参与者,有8种不同的疼痛结果:强度、接受、灾难化、自我效能、残疾、痛苦、与疼痛相关的应对和焦虑。考虑到研究之间的高度异质性和低质量评估,我们无法得出基于同情的干预措施的有效性的明确结论,也无法得出SC与疼痛结果之间的关联。进一步详细讨论了研究结果。这篇综述可以作为该领域大规模和高质量试验的起点,因为它提供了关于该主题的当前文献的有组织的概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spanish Journal of Psychology
Spanish Journal of Psychology Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Spanish Journal of Psychology is published with the aim of promoting the international dissemination of relevant empirical research and theoretical and methodological proposals in the various areas of specialization within psychology. The first Spanish journal with an international scope published entirely in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信