Determination of split renal function in voluntary renal donors by multidetector computed tomography and nuclear renography: How well do they correlate?

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
SA Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2021-03-05 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajr.v25i1.2009
Hira Lal, Anuradha Singh, Raghunandan Prasad, Priyank Yadav, Javed Akhtar, Sukanta Barai, Prabhakar Mishra, Dharmendra Bhadauria, Anupma Kaul, Narayan Prasad, Pragati Verma
{"title":"Determination of split renal function in voluntary renal donors by multidetector computed tomography and nuclear renography: How well do they correlate?","authors":"Hira Lal,&nbsp;Anuradha Singh,&nbsp;Raghunandan Prasad,&nbsp;Priyank Yadav,&nbsp;Javed Akhtar,&nbsp;Sukanta Barai,&nbsp;Prabhakar Mishra,&nbsp;Dharmendra Bhadauria,&nbsp;Anupma Kaul,&nbsp;Narayan Prasad,&nbsp;Pragati Verma","doi":"10.4102/sajr.v25i1.2009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of computed tomography (CT) for estimation of split renal function (SRF) has been reported previously. However, most of these studies have small samples, and many do not account for the renal attenuation at CT.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) volumetry-attenuation-based SRF with that obtained via Tc99m-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) renal scintigraphy in voluntary renal donors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2017 and January 2020, 526 voluntary renal donors were enrolled prospectively. All donors underwent contrast CT and DTPA scan before surgery. The semiautomatic region of interest (ROI) tool was applied slice by slice on axial CT images acquired in the arterial phase. The renal contour was drawn semiautomatically with mouse clicks around the renal parenchyma, and the renal volume was ascertained. Using renal volume and attenuation, SRF was determined and compared with results obtained at DTPA imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 44.91 ± 10.97 years (mean ± s.d.). There was no significant difference in SRF based on DTPA and MDCT volumetry for the left kidney (49.18% ± 3.40% vs. 49.15% ± 3.38%, <i>p</i> = 0.540) and for the right kidney (50.82% ± 3.40% vs. 50.86% ± 3.39%, <i>p</i> = 0.358). A very good correlation was observed between the two methods for the left kidney (<i>r</i> = 0.953, <i>p</i> = 0.000) and the right kidney (<i>r</i> = 0.955, <i>p</i> = 0.000). On simple linear regression analysis, 90.8% of DTPA SRF values for the left kidney and 91.3% of DTPA SRF values for the right kidney could be predicted correctly using the corresponding MDCT SRF values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MDCT volumetry-attenuation-derived estimation of SRF for living renal donors could be an alternative to renal scintigraphy-based SRF estimation.</p>","PeriodicalId":43442,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Radiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"2009"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008088/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v25i1.2009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The use of computed tomography (CT) for estimation of split renal function (SRF) has been reported previously. However, most of these studies have small samples, and many do not account for the renal attenuation at CT.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) volumetry-attenuation-based SRF with that obtained via Tc99m-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) renal scintigraphy in voluntary renal donors.

Methods: Between January 2017 and January 2020, 526 voluntary renal donors were enrolled prospectively. All donors underwent contrast CT and DTPA scan before surgery. The semiautomatic region of interest (ROI) tool was applied slice by slice on axial CT images acquired in the arterial phase. The renal contour was drawn semiautomatically with mouse clicks around the renal parenchyma, and the renal volume was ascertained. Using renal volume and attenuation, SRF was determined and compared with results obtained at DTPA imaging.

Results: The mean age was 44.91 ± 10.97 years (mean ± s.d.). There was no significant difference in SRF based on DTPA and MDCT volumetry for the left kidney (49.18% ± 3.40% vs. 49.15% ± 3.38%, p = 0.540) and for the right kidney (50.82% ± 3.40% vs. 50.86% ± 3.39%, p = 0.358). A very good correlation was observed between the two methods for the left kidney (r = 0.953, p = 0.000) and the right kidney (r = 0.955, p = 0.000). On simple linear regression analysis, 90.8% of DTPA SRF values for the left kidney and 91.3% of DTPA SRF values for the right kidney could be predicted correctly using the corresponding MDCT SRF values.

Conclusion: MDCT volumetry-attenuation-derived estimation of SRF for living renal donors could be an alternative to renal scintigraphy-based SRF estimation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

多探测器计算机断层扫描和核肾造影术测定自愿肾供者的分裂肾功能:它们之间的相关性如何?
背景:使用计算机断层扫描(CT)估计分裂肾功能(SRF)之前已有报道。然而,这些研究大多样本量小,而且许多研究没有考虑到CT上肾脏的衰减。目的:本研究的目的是比较多探测器计算机断层扫描(MDCT)基于体积衰减的SRF与tc99m -二乙烯三胺五乙酸(DTPA)肾显像获得的自愿肾供者的SRF。方法:2017年1月至2020年1月,前瞻性纳入526例自愿肾供者。所有供体术前均行对比CT和DTPA扫描。采用半自动感兴趣区域(ROI)工具对动脉期获得的轴向CT图像逐层应用。通过鼠标在肾实质周围点击,自动绘制肾廓线,确定肾体积。利用肾体积和衰减,确定SRF并比较DTPA成像结果。结果:患者平均年龄44.91±10.97岁(平均±s.d)。DTPA和MDCT容积法对左肾的SRF(49.18%±3.40% vs 49.15%±3.38%,p = 0.540)和对右肾的SRF(50.82%±3.40% vs 50.86%±3.39%,p = 0.358)无显著差异。两种方法对左肾(r = 0.953, p = 0.000)和右肾(r = 0.955, p = 0.000)有很好的相关性。在简单的线性回归分析中,使用相应的MDCT SRF值可以正确预测90.8%的左肾DTPA SRF值和91.3%的右肾DTPA SRF值。结论:MDCT体积衰减法估计活体肾供者的SRF可替代基于肾显像的SRF估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SA Journal of Radiology
SA Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The SA Journal of Radiology is the official journal of the Radiological Society of South Africa and the Professional Association of Radiologists in South Africa and Namibia. The SA Journal of Radiology is a general diagnostic radiological journal which carries original research and review articles, pictorial essays, case reports, letters, editorials, radiological practice and other radiological articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信