Optimal systolic blood pressure and reduced long-term mortality in older hypertensive women with prior coronary events – An analysis from INVEST☆

Q4 Medicine
Ruxandra I. Sava , Steven M. Smith , Yiqing Chen , Yasmeen Taha , Yan Gong , Ellen C. Keeley , Rhonda M. Cooper-Dehoff , Carl J. Pepine , Eileen M. Handberg
{"title":"Optimal systolic blood pressure and reduced long-term mortality in older hypertensive women with prior coronary events – An analysis from INVEST☆","authors":"Ruxandra I. Sava ,&nbsp;Steven M. Smith ,&nbsp;Yiqing Chen ,&nbsp;Yasmeen Taha ,&nbsp;Yan Gong ,&nbsp;Ellen C. Keeley ,&nbsp;Rhonda M. Cooper-Dehoff ,&nbsp;Carl J. Pepine ,&nbsp;Eileen M. Handberg","doi":"10.1016/j.ijchy.2020.100052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Hypertension and coronary artery disease (CAD) are a prevalent combination in older women, however limited data are available to guide blood pressure (BP) management. We hypothesized that older women with hypertension and CAD may not derive long-term benefit by achieving systolic BP (SBP) &lt; 130 mmHg.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed long-term all-cause mortality data from the International Verapamil SR/Trandolapril Study (INVEST), stratified by risk attributable to clinical severity of CAD (women with prior coronary events of myocardial infarction or revascularization considered high risk, all others at low risk) and by age group (50–64 or ≥65 years). The prognostic impact of achieving mean in-trial SBP &lt;130 (referent group) was compared with 130–139 and ≥ 140 mmHg using Cox proportional hazards, adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>SBPs &lt;130, 130–139, and ≥140 were achieved in 2960, 3024, and 3232 women, respectively. Among high-risk women aged ≥65 years, those achieving SBP 130–139 mmHg had lower mortality up to 16.7 years later than those with SBP &lt;130 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.69–0.96). High-risk women aged 50–64 achieving SBP 130–139 had a similar mortality risk as those with SBP &lt;130 (HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.87–1.68), while those achieving SBP ≥140 mmHg had a higher mortality risk than SBP &lt; 130 (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.37–2.68). A similar pattern was observed among low-risk women ≥65 and &lt;65 years old.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Among women ≥65 years old with hypertension and prior coronary events, in-trial SBP between 130 and 139 mmHg was associated with lower mortality over the long term versus SBP &lt;130 mmHg.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36839,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100052"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijchy.2020.100052","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259008622030029X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Hypertension and coronary artery disease (CAD) are a prevalent combination in older women, however limited data are available to guide blood pressure (BP) management. We hypothesized that older women with hypertension and CAD may not derive long-term benefit by achieving systolic BP (SBP) < 130 mmHg.

Methods

We analyzed long-term all-cause mortality data from the International Verapamil SR/Trandolapril Study (INVEST), stratified by risk attributable to clinical severity of CAD (women with prior coronary events of myocardial infarction or revascularization considered high risk, all others at low risk) and by age group (50–64 or ≥65 years). The prognostic impact of achieving mean in-trial SBP <130 (referent group) was compared with 130–139 and ≥ 140 mmHg using Cox proportional hazards, adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics.

Results

SBPs <130, 130–139, and ≥140 were achieved in 2960, 3024, and 3232 women, respectively. Among high-risk women aged ≥65 years, those achieving SBP 130–139 mmHg had lower mortality up to 16.7 years later than those with SBP <130 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.69–0.96). High-risk women aged 50–64 achieving SBP 130–139 had a similar mortality risk as those with SBP <130 (HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.87–1.68), while those achieving SBP ≥140 mmHg had a higher mortality risk than SBP < 130 (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.37–2.68). A similar pattern was observed among low-risk women ≥65 and <65 years old.

Conclusion

Among women ≥65 years old with hypertension and prior coronary events, in-trial SBP between 130 and 139 mmHg was associated with lower mortality over the long term versus SBP <130 mmHg.

Abstract Image

有冠状动脉事件的老年高血压妇女的最佳收缩压和降低长期死亡率——来自INVEST的一项分析☆
背景:高血压和冠状动脉疾病(CAD)在老年妇女中是一种普遍的组合,然而指导血压(BP)管理的数据有限。我们假设患有高血压和CAD的老年妇女可能无法通过达到收缩压(SBP) <来获得长期益处;130毫米汞柱。方法:我们分析了来自国际维拉帕米SR/Trandolapril研究(INVEST)的长期全因死亡率数据,并根据CAD临床严重程度的风险(既往有冠状动脉事件或心肌梗死或血运重建症的女性为高风险,其他均为低风险)和年龄组(50-64岁或≥65岁)进行分层。试验中平均收缩压<达到130(参照组)与130 - 139和≥140 mmHg的预后影响比较,采用Cox比例风险,调整人口统计学和临床特征。结果分别有2960例、3024例和3232例女性的ssbps达到130、130 ~ 139和≥140。在≥65岁的高危女性中,收缩压达到130 - 139 mmHg的女性死亡率比收缩压达到130的女性低16.7年(风险比[HR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.96)。50-64岁收缩压达到130 - 139的高危妇女的死亡风险与收缩压和血压130的妇女相似(HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.87-1.68),而收缩压≥140 mmHg的妇女的死亡风险高于收缩压和血压130的妇女;130 (hr 1.92, 95% ci 1.37-2.68)。在≥65岁和65岁的低危女性中也观察到类似的模式。结论:在≥65岁且有高血压和既往冠状动脉事件的女性中,试验中收缩压在130 - 139mmhg与收缩压≤130 mmHg相比,长期死亡率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension
International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信