Does coaching matter? Examining the impact of specific practice facilitation strategies on implementation of quality improvement interventions in the Healthy Hearts in the Heartland study.

Theresa L Walunas, Jiancheng Ye, Jennifer Bannon, Ann Wang, Abel N Kho, Justin D Smith, Nicholas Soulakis
{"title":"Does coaching matter? Examining the impact of specific practice facilitation strategies on implementation of quality improvement interventions in the Healthy Hearts in the Heartland study.","authors":"Theresa L Walunas,&nbsp;Jiancheng Ye,&nbsp;Jennifer Bannon,&nbsp;Ann Wang,&nbsp;Abel N Kho,&nbsp;Justin D Smith,&nbsp;Nicholas Soulakis","doi":"10.1186/s13012-021-01100-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Practice facilitation is a multicomponent implementation strategy used to improve the capacity for practices to address care quality and implementation gaps. We sought to assess whether practice facilitators use of coaching strategies aimed at improving self-sufficiency were associated with improved implementation of quality improvement (QI) interventions in the Healthy Hearts in the Heartland Study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We mapped 27 practice facilitation activities to a framework that classifies practice facilitation strategies by the degree to which the practice develops its own process expertise (Doing Tasks, Project Management, Consulting, Teaching, and Coaching) and then used regression tree analysis to group practices by facilitation strategies experienced. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess whether practice groups identified by regression tree analysis were associated with successful implementation of QI interventions and practice and study context variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no association between number of strategies performed by practice facilitators and number of QI interventions implemented. Regression tree analysis identified 4 distinct practice groups based on the number of Project Management and Coaching strategies performed. The median number of interventions increased across the groups. Practices receiving > 4 project management and > 6 coaching activities implemented a median of 17 of 35 interventions. Groups did not differ significantly by practice size, association with a healthcare network, or practice type. Statistically significant differences in practice location, number and duration of facilitator visits, and early study termination emerged among the groups, compared to the overall practice population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Practices that engage in more coaching-based strategies with practice facilitators are more likely to implement more QI interventions, and practice receptivity to these strategies was not dependent on basic practice demographics.</p>","PeriodicalId":417097,"journal":{"name":"Implementation Science : IS","volume":" ","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13012-021-01100-8","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation Science : IS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01100-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Background: Practice facilitation is a multicomponent implementation strategy used to improve the capacity for practices to address care quality and implementation gaps. We sought to assess whether practice facilitators use of coaching strategies aimed at improving self-sufficiency were associated with improved implementation of quality improvement (QI) interventions in the Healthy Hearts in the Heartland Study.

Methods: We mapped 27 practice facilitation activities to a framework that classifies practice facilitation strategies by the degree to which the practice develops its own process expertise (Doing Tasks, Project Management, Consulting, Teaching, and Coaching) and then used regression tree analysis to group practices by facilitation strategies experienced. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess whether practice groups identified by regression tree analysis were associated with successful implementation of QI interventions and practice and study context variables.

Results: There was no association between number of strategies performed by practice facilitators and number of QI interventions implemented. Regression tree analysis identified 4 distinct practice groups based on the number of Project Management and Coaching strategies performed. The median number of interventions increased across the groups. Practices receiving > 4 project management and > 6 coaching activities implemented a median of 17 of 35 interventions. Groups did not differ significantly by practice size, association with a healthcare network, or practice type. Statistically significant differences in practice location, number and duration of facilitator visits, and early study termination emerged among the groups, compared to the overall practice population.

Conclusions: Practices that engage in more coaching-based strategies with practice facilitators are more likely to implement more QI interventions, and practice receptivity to these strategies was not dependent on basic practice demographics.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

教练重要吗?研究特定实践促进策略对心脏健康研究中质量改善干预措施实施的影响。
背景:实践促进是一种多组件实施战略,用于提高实践解决护理质量和实施差距的能力。我们试图评估在心脏地带健康心脏研究中,练习促进者使用旨在提高自给自足的指导策略是否与质量改进(QI)干预措施的改进实施有关。方法:我们将27个实践促进活动映射到一个框架中,该框架根据实践发展自己的过程专业知识(做任务、项目管理、咨询、教学和指导)的程度对实践促进策略进行分类,然后根据经验丰富的促进策略对小组实践使用回归树分析。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验来评估回归树分析确定的实践组是否与QI干预措施的成功实施以及实践和研究背景变量相关。结果:实践促进者执行的策略数量与实施的QI干预数量之间没有关联。回归树分析根据执行的项目管理和指导策略的数量确定了4个不同的实践组。干预的中位数在各组中有所增加。接受> 4个项目管理和> 6个指导活动的实践实施了35个干预措施中的17个。各组在实践规模、与医疗保健网络的关联或实践类型方面没有显着差异。与总体实践人群相比,在实践地点、引导员访问的次数和持续时间以及早期研究终止方面,组间出现了统计学上的显著差异。结论:在实践促进者的指导下,采用更多基于指导的策略的实践更有可能实施更多的QI干预措施,并且实践对这些策略的接受程度并不依赖于基本的实践人口统计数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信