A step toward understanding the mechanism of action of audit and feedback: a qualitative study of implementation strategies.

Mellanie V Springer, Anne E Sales, Nishat Islam, A Camille McBride, Zach Landis-Lewis, Michael Tupper, Casey L Corches, Maria Cielito Robles, Lesli E Skolarus
{"title":"A step toward understanding the mechanism of action of audit and feedback: a qualitative study of implementation strategies.","authors":"Mellanie V Springer,&nbsp;Anne E Sales,&nbsp;Nishat Islam,&nbsp;A Camille McBride,&nbsp;Zach Landis-Lewis,&nbsp;Michael Tupper,&nbsp;Casey L Corches,&nbsp;Maria Cielito Robles,&nbsp;Lesli E Skolarus","doi":"10.1186/s13012-021-01102-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Audit and feedback (A&F) is a widely used implementation strategy. Understanding mechanisms of action of A&F increases the likelihood that the strategy will lead to implementation of an evidence-based practice. We therefore sought to understand one hospital's experience selecting and implementing an A&F intervention, to determine the implementation strategies that were used by staff and to specify the mechanism of action of those implementation strategies using causal pathway models, with the ultimate goal of improving acute stroke treatment practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected an A&F strategy in a hospital, initially based on implementation determinants and staff consideration of their performance on acute stroke treatment measures. After 7 months of A&F, we conducted semi-structured interviews of hospital providers and administrative staff to understand how it contributed to implementing guideline-concordant acute stroke treatment (medication named tissue plasminogen activator). We coded the interviews to identify the implementation strategies that staff used following A&F and to assess their mechanisms of action.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified five implementation strategies that staff used following the feedback intervention. These included (1) creating folders containing the acute stroke treatment protocol for the emergency department, (2) educating providers about the protocol for acute stroke, (3) obtaining computed tomography imaging of stroke patients immediately upon emergency department arrival, (4) increasing access to acute stroke medical treatment in the emergency department, and (5) providing additional staff support for implementation of the protocol in the emergency department. We identified enablement, training, and environmental restructuring as mechanisms of action through which the implementation strategies acted to improve guideline-concordant and timely acute stroke treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A&F of a hospital's acute stroke treatment practices generated additional implementation strategies that acted through various mechanisms of action. Future studies should focus on how initial implementation strategies can be amplified through internal mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":417097,"journal":{"name":"Implementation Science : IS","volume":" ","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13012-021-01102-6","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation Science : IS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01102-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background: Audit and feedback (A&F) is a widely used implementation strategy. Understanding mechanisms of action of A&F increases the likelihood that the strategy will lead to implementation of an evidence-based practice. We therefore sought to understand one hospital's experience selecting and implementing an A&F intervention, to determine the implementation strategies that were used by staff and to specify the mechanism of action of those implementation strategies using causal pathway models, with the ultimate goal of improving acute stroke treatment practices.

Methods: We selected an A&F strategy in a hospital, initially based on implementation determinants and staff consideration of their performance on acute stroke treatment measures. After 7 months of A&F, we conducted semi-structured interviews of hospital providers and administrative staff to understand how it contributed to implementing guideline-concordant acute stroke treatment (medication named tissue plasminogen activator). We coded the interviews to identify the implementation strategies that staff used following A&F and to assess their mechanisms of action.

Results: We identified five implementation strategies that staff used following the feedback intervention. These included (1) creating folders containing the acute stroke treatment protocol for the emergency department, (2) educating providers about the protocol for acute stroke, (3) obtaining computed tomography imaging of stroke patients immediately upon emergency department arrival, (4) increasing access to acute stroke medical treatment in the emergency department, and (5) providing additional staff support for implementation of the protocol in the emergency department. We identified enablement, training, and environmental restructuring as mechanisms of action through which the implementation strategies acted to improve guideline-concordant and timely acute stroke treatment.

Conclusions: A&F of a hospital's acute stroke treatment practices generated additional implementation strategies that acted through various mechanisms of action. Future studies should focus on how initial implementation strategies can be amplified through internal mechanisms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

迈向了解审计和反馈行动机制的一步:对实施策略的定性研究。
背景:审计与反馈(A&F)是一种广泛使用的实施策略。了解A&F的作用机制可以提高该战略导致实施循证实践的可能性。因此,我们试图了解一家医院选择和实施A&F干预措施的经验,以确定工作人员使用的实施策略,并使用因果通路模型指定这些实施策略的作用机制,最终目标是改善急性卒中治疗实践。方法:我们选择了一个医院的A&F策略,最初是基于实施决定因素和工作人员对他们在急性卒中治疗措施中的表现的考虑。在A&F治疗7个月后,我们对医院提供者和行政人员进行了半结构化访谈,以了解它如何有助于实施符合指南的急性卒中治疗(药物命名为组织纤溶酶原激活剂)。我们对访谈进行了编码,以确定员工在A&F之后使用的实施策略,并评估他们的行动机制。结果:我们确定了员工在反馈干预后使用的五种实施策略。这些措施包括(1)为急诊科创建包含急性中风治疗方案的文件夹,(2)教育提供者关于急性中风治疗方案,(3)在急诊科到达后立即获得中风患者的计算机断层扫描成像,(4)增加急诊科对急性中风医学治疗的获取,以及(5)为急诊科实施方案提供额外的工作人员支持。我们确定了使能、培训和环境重组作为行动机制,通过这些机制,实施策略可以改善符合指南的及时急性卒中治疗。结论:医院急性卒中治疗实践的A&F产生了通过各种作用机制起作用的额外实施策略。今后的研究应侧重于如何通过内部机制扩大初步执行战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信