Management of sudden sensorineural hearing loss among primary care physicians in Canada: a survey study.

IF 2.2
Benjamin Ng, Matthew G Crowson, Vincent Lin
{"title":"Management of sudden sensorineural hearing loss among primary care physicians in Canada: a survey study.","authors":"Benjamin Ng,&nbsp;Matthew G Crowson,&nbsp;Vincent Lin","doi":"10.1186/s40463-021-00498-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SSNHL) is a medical emergency requiring immediate attention as delayed treatment can lead to permanent and devastating consequences. Primary care physicians are likely the first to be presented with SSNHL and therefore have the crucial role of recognizing it and initiating timely and appropriate management. The aim of this study was to gain insight into the current knowledge and practice trends pertaining to the diagnosis and management of SSNHL among family physicians in Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An 18-question survey targeting Canadian family physicians was marketed through two, physician-only discussion groups on the social media platform Facebook. Responses were collected between August 1st and December 22nd 2019 then aggregated and quantified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>52 family physicians submitted responses. 94.2% (n = 49) reported that in their practice, unilateral SSNHL warrants urgent referral to otolaryngology and 84.6% (n = 44) reported that unilateral sudden-onset hearing loss warrants urgent referral for audiological testing. 73.1% of participants (n = 38) reported that they would attempt to differentiate between conductive and sensorineural hearing loss if presented with unilateral, acute or sudden-onset hearing loss. 61.5% (n = 32) would rely on tuning fork tests to inform management decisions, as compared to 94.2% (n = 49) relying on case history and 88.5% (n = 46) on otoscopy. 76.9% (n = 40) would prescribe corticosteroids if presented with confirmed, unilateral SSNHL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of family physicians in the study would make appropriate referral and treatment decisions in the management of SSNHL, understanding it is a medical emergency. Tuning fork tests are under-utilized for informing management decisions compared to other means of differentiating conductive and sensorineural hearing loss. Further research is needed to understand why some family physicians do not prescribe corticosteroids for treatment of SSNHL, which may then identify any gaps in knowledge or inform improvements in clinical protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":520683,"journal":{"name":"Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale","volume":" ","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40463-021-00498-x","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-021-00498-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SSNHL) is a medical emergency requiring immediate attention as delayed treatment can lead to permanent and devastating consequences. Primary care physicians are likely the first to be presented with SSNHL and therefore have the crucial role of recognizing it and initiating timely and appropriate management. The aim of this study was to gain insight into the current knowledge and practice trends pertaining to the diagnosis and management of SSNHL among family physicians in Canada.

Methods: An 18-question survey targeting Canadian family physicians was marketed through two, physician-only discussion groups on the social media platform Facebook. Responses were collected between August 1st and December 22nd 2019 then aggregated and quantified.

Results: 52 family physicians submitted responses. 94.2% (n = 49) reported that in their practice, unilateral SSNHL warrants urgent referral to otolaryngology and 84.6% (n = 44) reported that unilateral sudden-onset hearing loss warrants urgent referral for audiological testing. 73.1% of participants (n = 38) reported that they would attempt to differentiate between conductive and sensorineural hearing loss if presented with unilateral, acute or sudden-onset hearing loss. 61.5% (n = 32) would rely on tuning fork tests to inform management decisions, as compared to 94.2% (n = 49) relying on case history and 88.5% (n = 46) on otoscopy. 76.9% (n = 40) would prescribe corticosteroids if presented with confirmed, unilateral SSNHL.

Conclusion: The majority of family physicians in the study would make appropriate referral and treatment decisions in the management of SSNHL, understanding it is a medical emergency. Tuning fork tests are under-utilized for informing management decisions compared to other means of differentiating conductive and sensorineural hearing loss. Further research is needed to understand why some family physicians do not prescribe corticosteroids for treatment of SSNHL, which may then identify any gaps in knowledge or inform improvements in clinical protocol.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

加拿大初级保健医生对突发性感音神经性听力损失的管理:一项调查研究。
背景:突发性感音神经性听力损失(SSNHL)是一种需要立即关注的医疗紧急情况,因为延迟治疗可能导致永久性和毁灭性的后果。初级保健医生可能是第一个出现SSNHL的人,因此在识别和及时启动适当的管理方面起着至关重要的作用。本研究的目的是深入了解目前加拿大家庭医生对SSNHL的诊断和管理的知识和实践趋势。方法:一项针对加拿大家庭医生的18个问题的调查通过社交媒体平台Facebook上的两个仅限医生的讨论组进行营销。在2019年8月1日至12月22日期间收集回复,然后进行汇总和量化。结果:52名家庭医生提交了回复。94.2% (n = 49)报告在他们的实践中,单侧SSNHL需要紧急转诊到耳鼻喉科,84.6% (n = 44)报告单侧突发性听力损失需要紧急转诊到听力学检查。73.1%的参与者(n = 38)报告说,如果出现单侧、急性或突发性听力损失,他们会试图区分传导性听力损失和感觉神经性听力损失。61.5% (n = 32)的人会依赖音叉测试来告知管理决策,相比之下,94.2% (n = 49)的人依赖病史,88.5% (n = 46)的人依赖耳镜检查。76.9% (n = 40)的患者在确诊单侧SSNHL时会使用皮质类固醇。结论:本研究中大多数家庭医生在处理SSNHL时会做出适当的转诊和治疗决策,并理解这是一种医疗紧急情况。与其他区分传导性和感音神经性听力损失的方法相比,音叉测试在为管理决策提供信息方面的利用不足。需要进一步的研究来理解为什么一些家庭医生不开皮质类固醇治疗SSNHL,这可能会发现知识上的差距或为临床方案的改进提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信